The persons Rittenhouse shot were all criminal felons with records...

Yes, it was absurd to claim Rittenhouse is allowed to carry a gun to a BLM protest under Wisconsin hunting laws. Good to see you finally caught onto that absurdity.

No, it is absurd to think you could erupt with anything other than lie filled lunacy thinking it doesn't make you look stupid and pathetic. ;)
 
To charge Grosskreutz with anything, you need evidence. He was legally carrying a gun, which he only drew after being attacked with deadly force. That is the very definition of self defense. Rittenhouse was using deadly force against Grosskreutz when Grosskreutz drew his gun.

Rittenshouse had been beaten to the ground when he fired his weapon you lying dumb fuck. WTF is wrong with you leftist assholes? LOOK at the video I provided dumbass.
 
The Party of the Jackass loves criminals, idiots and illegals.

Cheong is not in the USA legally, but he is not in the USA at all, so he is not an illegal alien. He is a not here alien.

Once again, Cheong is an editor of the "Post Millennial", which is a right wing "news" source. Somehow you have confused your source of information with an active participant. He is not.
 
Doubtful this will go away. Zimmerman was a classic self-defense case. Rittenhouse fired into a crowd. Three people shot, two dead. I strongly doubt all three can be filed under "self-defense". Even if the video evidence clears him of each shooting, the mere act of firing into a crowd falls under reckless endangerment, illegal discharge of a weapon and who knows what else.

Rittenhouse will be found NOT guilty in a court of law that presumes his innocence. The loons who charged him will fail trying to prove this was anything BUT self defense.

This is what happens when you refuse to allow the police, or National Guard when it comes to these leftist mobs, do their jobs. That's when citizens are then compelled to protect their own property by any means necessary. You have to be a low IQ, Neanderthal partisan hack to defend the actions of these violent mobs.

As the threads opening clearly pointed out; the thugs who attacked Rittenhouse ALL have criminal backgrounds.
 
What the original posting in this thread clearly proves is that the Alt Right is posting a bunch of lies about the incident.
What is the truth about the incident....From the beginning, please;)
 
Cheong is not in the USA legally, but he is not in the USA at all, so he is not an illegal alien. He is a not here alien.

Once again, Cheong is an editor of the "Post Millennial", which is a right wing "news" source. Somehow you have confused your source of information with an active participant. He is not.

Where have I had Cheong in ANY of my posts you mental midget? Fuck off dumbass.
 
so it's very plausible rittenhouse's alleged offenses were acts of self defense, consider the criminal proclivities of those involved.

It is a very bad sign for Rittenhouse that those that defend him need to make up lies about his victims. It is a worse sign that his lawyer is talking about his crimes being the "first shots in a second American Revolution." Acts of war against the US Government is not "self defense", and if that revolution fails, he is guilty of treason (according to his own lawyer).
 
What is the truth about the incident....From the beginning, please;)

I do not know what the entire truth is, and may never know. What I do know is when the Alt Right posts lies it is a bad sign that even they do not believe Rittenhouse is innocent.
 
It is a very bad sign for Rittenhouse that those that defend him need to make up lies about his victims.

It's very sad that worthless pieces of human filth like you and the left defend criminals, thugs and violent mobs.

It is a worse sign that his lawyer is talking about his crimes being the "first shots in a second American Revolution." Acts of war against the US Government is not "self defense", and if that revolution fails, he is guilty of treason (according to his own lawyer).

Worse still when the PHONY media and Democratic Party of the Jackass take the side of violent mobs, criminals and Marxists.
 
It is a very bad sign for Rittenhouse that those that defend him need to make up lies about his victims. It is a worse sign that his lawyer is talking about his crimes being the "first shots in a second American Revolution." Acts of war against the US Government is not "self defense", and if that revolution fails, he is guilty of treason (according to his own lawyer).

put down the pipe.
 
I do not know what the entire truth is, and may never know. What I do know is when the Alt Right posts lies it is a bad sign that even they do not believe Rittenhouse is innocent.
Why don't we wait for the evidence to be presented, to get a better idea of what happened...Unless you have proof the information posted is incorrect....
Why were people out rioting that evening?
 
Doubtful this will go away. Zimmerman was a classic self-defense case. Rittenhouse fired into a crowd. Three people shot, two dead. I strongly doubt all three can be filed under "self-defense". Even if the video evidence clears him of each shooting, the mere act of firing into a crowd falls under reckless endangerment, illegal discharge of a weapon and who knows what else.

His shooting was re4markably accurate for someone who supposedly "fired into a crowd". Every one of the people he shot were assaulting him or advancing toward him in a threatening manner.

It's all on video.

 
Why don't we wait for the eveidnece to be presented, to get a better idea of what happened...Unless you have proof the information posted is incorrect....
Why were people out rioting that evening?

It is a fact that the "facts" by the Alt Right are lies. Do you have any evidence that the three people shot were rioting?
 
His shooting was re4markably accurate for someone who supposedly "fired into a crowd". Every one of the people he shot were assaulting him or advancing toward him in a threatening manner.

It's all on video.

Yes, it's all on video which is sure to be played at his trial.
 
Back
Top