The persons Rittenhouse shot were all criminal felons with records...
- Thread starter T. A. Gardner
- Start date
I posted the statute. He ignored it, because he has to.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Thank you for that completely uncalled for and gratuitous insult that added nothing to the conversation. Can you go back to the kiddie table? The adults are talking here.
Grosskreutz had a valid concealed carry permit, and a legal gun. Maybe it should not have been legal, but it was 100% legal.
There is no way to outrun a bullet, so once Rittenhouse pointed the gun at him, he had a self defense right to return fire. You can claim that Rittenhouse would have spared him, but he is not required to take that risk.
A Story for Every Occasion™.
jacksonsprat22
Verified User
go fuck yourself you racist asshole
The video evidence doesn't seem to support your version.
@7:28
Is that why you won't back up your claim with any proof?
Even Gardner is admitting Grosskreutz had a valid concealed carry permit. With no felony convictions, it was easy for Grosskreutz to get, and keep a valid concealed carry permit in Wisconsin.
Proving he was illegally carrying a gun is practically impossible. Grosskreutz could simply show his permit, and get charges immediately dismissed.
Meanwhile, Rittenhouse has a real legal problem with carrying a gun. Because he is under 18, he has to show that he was carrying the gun for hunting purposes... And clearly he was not hunting. He even admits he was using the gun as part of a paramilitary operation.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Doesn't change he drew on Rittenhouse and given the circumstances, Rittenhouse shooting him is self-defense. After all, it was almost a certainty that Grosskreutz would have fired on Rittenhouse if he hand shot him.
Initially Grosskreutz put his hands up. We can see that in the video. Yes, at that point Rittenhouse was pointing his rifle at him. When Rittenhouse turned to get up, Grosskreutz drew his weapon. That was a mistake. Grosskreutz could have fled the scene unscathed. But he chose to fight and got shot for it. Self-defense.
Is "racist" just a meaningless slur you use to dehumanize anyone who dares to disagree with you?
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Oh?! "Racist" too. How usual... The Left just has no originality or creativity when it comes to insults... Now, see, if I was going to insult you I'd use something more original, like You zipper lipped, syphililetic titheaded piece of butt-fuck residue... See, that's original.
According to an April 2011 report by the Pew Center on the States, the average national recidivism rate for released prisoners is 43%.[SUP][
[/SUP]https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pe.../reports/0001/01/01/state-of-recidivism?amp=1
Grosskreutz has no felony convictions, is over 18, and resides in Wisconsin, so it was easy for him to get a concealed carry permit.
Rittenhouse was under 18. There are exceptions under which he can possess a gun, but none of them applied to him that night. He is from Illinois, so he might have carried the gun illegally over state lines.
You are just grasping at straws Walt. Talking out your ass as usual.
I am not trying to be cruel here Gardner, but you have not exactly been a fount of accurate information here.
Grosskreutz had a valid concealed carry permit. That is not grasping at straws. That is a definite legal document that states that Grosskreutz can carry a concealed weapon. It was 100% legal for him to do so.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
I have given way more than anyone else in this thread. Yes, I made some mistakes in what was presented and admitted to those and tried to correct them. That's considerably more than anyone else seems to be doing.
"Giving" out slander against people is not a good thing. I think you should be more careful with your lies about people.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Your information is badly outdated. That is from the 1990's and early 2000's. Mine is current.