The persons Rittenhouse shot were all criminal felons with records...

T. A. Gardner said:
Interesting that the three people shot by Rittenhouse, the 17 year-old all had serious criminal records.

Joseph Rosenbaum, the first person Rittenhouse shot was seen by numerous people engaged in arson during the riot in question. Rosenbaum is a convicted sex offender.

Then there's Ian Miles Cheong. He's the guy that attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard. Cheong has numerous previous convictions for assault, threatening with a dangerous weapon, endangerment, domestic abuse (aka wife beater), etc.

EgaR7wcU4AAgGLX


Thug with a skateboard if you will.

His last was Giage "Lefty" Grosskreutz. Grosskreutz pulled a pistol and pointed it at Rittenhouse who then shot and wounded him. Grosskreutz has a prior felony conviction for a burglary so he was in the commission of a felony merely possessing a firearm.

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/20...elons-who-were-shot-while-acting-like-felons/

This isn't a judgement about the validity of Rittenhouse's actions. It is just a note on who the people he shot were (I won't call them victims as two out of three clearly intended by their actions to seriously injure or kill Rittenhouse).
Click to expand...

It doesn't really matter who they were if he was simply defending himself he should be exonerated.
 
Walt said:
The gun was used in Wisconsin, and seized in Illinois when Rittenhouse was arrested. That means the gun definitely crossed state lines, and almost certainly crossed state lines with Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse's supporters claim that the gun was "loaned" to Rittenhouse by a friend in Wisconsin, so did not cross the state line into Wisconsin. The gun is still being traced to find out if that is true.

The argument against that being true is Rittenhouse photographed himself with the exact same type of gun in Illinois, and his mother bought him the exact same type of gun (again in Illinois). We are being asked to believe that Rittenhouse left his own gun at home, and borrowed an exactly same gun from a friend.

The truth will work itself out.
Click to expand...

It will. He is not guilty of any crimes...
 
Crocodile said:
Reinstating that certain types can not be sold is not banning guns. Confiscating them wasn't even part of it so the nutters don't need to get huffy about it. Closing loopholes and massive increases in background checks aren't banning guns either. It's called making a commodity safe and responsible. It's done with just about everything besides guns in our country where we have basically done the opposite.
Click to expand...

Reason #1 to not vote Democrat: They cannot be trusted to tell the truth.
 
AProudLefty said:
I know. Their criminal backgrounds have no bearing in this.
Click to expand...
Agreed. Kyle didn't know and it's irrelevant to why he fired into a crowd.

The Defense will try to bring it up to sully the character of those Kyle shot, but the video will be the main evidence. All the video, not just what is currently available for viewing.
 
jacksonsprat22 said:
Dutch Uncle said:
Crocodile said:
Reinstating that certain types can not be sold is not banning guns. Confiscating them wasn't even part of it so the nutters don't need to get huffy about it. Closing loopholes and massive increases in background checks aren't banning guns either. It's called making a commodity safe and responsible. It's done with just about everything besides guns in our country where we have basically done the opposite.
Click to expand...
Reason #1 to not vote Democrat: They cannot be trusted to tell the truth.
Click to expand...
And you support the biggest liar in history, Trump.
Click to expand...
QED

You're a Democratic liar, son. Everyone knows I don't support Trump. Thank you for proving my point; Democrats should never be trusted to tell the truth.
 
gfm7175 said:
Wisconsin State Statute 948.60
Click to expand...

There is no exception there that allows for a 17 year old to carry a loaded firearm in a city.

The exceptions are here...
(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.

Are you arguing that Rittenhouse was engaged in target practice or was a member of the national guard operating in the line of duty? We know for certain he wasn't under the supervision of an adult.
 
BRUTALITOPS said:
he's even more innocent than zimmerman. it shouldn't even be debated. we have video evidence of him being chased by an armed mob
Click to expand...

Disagreed on "more innocent" since Zimmerman did nothing illegal. Kyle, OTOH, probably did break a few laws. I agree it's not First Degree Murder, but in his case manslaughter or reckless endangerment could be an issue.

As Louisville is proving, those on the Left are tiring of being the only ones unarmed. I expect some wannabe-soldier militia dumbasses are going to be shot over the next few months. Even more if Trump refuses to accept the results of the election.
 
jacksonsprat22 said:
Dutch Uncle said:
jacksonsprat22 said:
Dutch Uncle said:
Crocodile said:
Reinstating that certain types can not be sold is not banning guns. Confiscating them wasn't even part of it so the nutters don't need to get huffy about it. Closing loopholes and massive increases in background checks aren't banning guns either. It's called making a commodity safe and responsible. It's done with just about everything besides guns in our country where we have basically done the opposite.
Click to expand...
Reason #1 to not vote Democrat: They cannot be trusted to tell the truth.
Click to expand...
And you support the biggest liar in history, Trump.
Click to expand...
QED

You're a Democratic liar, son. Everyone knows I don't support Trump. Thank you for proving my point; Democrats should never be trusted to tell the truth.
Click to expand...

fuck you
Click to expand...

reason #5 to not vote Democrat, Condescension and elitism;
 
Dutch Uncle said:
As Louisville is proving, those on the Left are tiring of being the only ones unarmed. I expect some wannabe-soldier militia dumbasses are going to be shot over the next few months. Even more if Trump refuses to accept the results of the election.
Click to expand...

The problem for the Left is that they are lousy shots and usually poorly trained in the use of firearms. Whatever you want to say about Rittenhouse, the kid knew how to use that rifle. Grosskreutz didn't know how to use his pistol. You can see that on the videos. I'd say this is not uncommon for whatever reason it might be. There are some groups on the Left that embrace using firearms like the John Brown Gun Club and Redneck Revolt, but if you watch their videos the train for shit in their use.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
The problem for the Left is that they are lousy shots and usually poorly trained in the use of firearms. Whatever you want to say about Rittenhouse, the kid knew how to use that rifle. Grosskreutz didn't know how to use his pistol. You can see that on the videos. I'd say this is not uncommon for whatever reason it might be. There are some groups on the Left that embrace using firearms like the John Brown Gun Club and Redneck Revolt, but if you watch their videos the train for shit in their use.
Click to expand...

You support murder. Fuck you and you Trump Fascists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top