Can You Spot The Difference?

Disagreed.

BTDT

False we'll go through this again.

I stated the government's role is to regulate.

You misrepresented that and said that I am saying no help for anybody.

I corrected you and explained regulating and deregulating is the way the government helps.

you ignored that and then told me I'm anti-gay.

I explained that I am a gay person and I'm in a relationship with another person of the same sex.

You ignored that and then proceeded to tell me that everyone who votes a certain way believes everything 100% that the platform stands for and if I didn't believe that I needed to explain it to you. After I spent several posts explaining it to you.

When you're in a discussion with somebody you have to listen to what they say in order to know what they think.
 
False we'll go through this again.

I stated the government's role is to regulate.

You misrepresented that and said that I am saying no help for anybody.

I corrected you and explained regulating and deregulating is the way the government helps.

you ignored that and then told me I'm anti-gay.

I explained that I am a gay person and I'm in a relationship with another person of the same sex.

You ignored that and then proceeded to tell me that everyone who votes a certain way believes everything 100% that the platform stands for and if I didn't believe that I needed to explain it to you. After I spent several posts explaining it to you.

When you're in a discussion with somebody you have to listen to what they say in order to know what they think.

You're still wrong as proved by the Founders quotes.
 
3-5f7f0336cf3ee__700.jpg
 
Show me in the founding documents where it's the government's job to clothe and feed people and pay for their health insurance.
There you go straw manning again. LOL

BTW, it's right next to my right to own a dozen 30-round magazines.
 
Show me in the founding documents where it's the government's job to clothe and feed people and pay for their health insurance.

It is called "Promote the General Welfare". The Founders intended for it to mean ALL of the people. Right wingers have perverted that to mean the 1%.

BTW, do some research on the history of poor house, food banks, and free medical care, if you dare to have your ideology challenged with reality.
 
Originally Posted by Eagle_Eye said:
Why do the Democrats want to control our lives? You do know communism is a dead unworkable system don't you?
Laughable imagination there- BLAHAHAHAHA!
Here is a question- WHY ARE YOU REPUBLICANS SUCH IMMORAL WHITE SUPREMACIST RACISTS?

While survival of the fittest fascists Christiananality depends on integrity where they both whitewash election propaganda of Biden's batty senility dementia & Trump's "coronavirus will disappear" pseudoscience just as when KKK churchstate cops fabricated misnomer immaculate vote stealing conception to protect & serve a county which, with it's Freudian slips certainly was admitting to those burning Bush's Arab "death to the infidels" 9/11 health care plan after failure to uphold FEMA laws in damaging a retired FBI agents home with water damages multiple times as if the Federal Lynching KKK churchstate of hate was still jihad celebrating that liberty & justice for all the Christians second coming in a Christian Nation while SCOTUS wouldn't consider stolen absentee voting ballots with fabricated misnomer immaculate drug conceptions, but for a Federal Lynching KKK churchstate of hate cops fabricated stolen vote misnomer ....
 
There you go straw manning again. LOL

BTW, it's right next to my right to own a dozen 30-round magazines.


There is no such right. In fact, until the Heller decision in 2008 there was not even a right to private ownership of guns, and the question of regulation was decided in 1925, or so.
 
It is called "Promote the General Welfare". The Founders intended for it to mean ALL of the people. Right wingers have perverted that to mean the 1%.
Lol this hold the Republicans are evil crap it's so tired so funny such partisan hackery.
BTW, do some research on the history of poor house, food banks, and free medical care, if you dare to have your ideology challenged with reality.
There's no such thing as free medical Care unless you have doctors that are enslaved they have to be paid and somebody has to do the paying.

I seriously doubt the founders set up a Marxist government.
 
They are all a "baby" just in different periods of development. Science has declared it to be so.

When you can prove that please let me know.

There is no such right. In fact, until the Heller decision in 2008 there was not even a right to private ownership of guns, and the question of regulation was decided in 1925, or so.

Yet I have them. Why?
 
The Republican Party, which once was a decent political party and a reliable loyal opposition, has become the Nazi Party of America trying to install Trump as the Fuhrer.
Nazism is a form of socialism. That's the Democrats, dumbass.
The Republican Party has become worse than useless. They have become the destruction party. We have to hope the voters of America teaches them a much needed lesson in November.
The Democrats are funding and supporting riots, arson, looting, an mayhem in cities. It is Democrats that want to defund the police. It is Democrats that allowed CHAZ to form and is condoning the riots in Portland. It is Democrats that shut down the economy unnecessarily and unconstitutionally. It is Democrats that destroyed the cities of Detroit, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and New York City. They are what they are because of Democrats. Crime is out of control, people are moving out of these areas, and the looting, arson, murders, and vandalism is unchecked.
What they have become...should disgust all intelligent, sane people.

You are describing yourself and Democrats. Inversion fallacy.
 
Here you are embracing the worse authoritarian president in history, and then you point the finger at the Democrats. It's apparent that you're just not smart enough to know what you're talking about.

Attempted circular proof (fundamentalism). Circular argument fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.
 
Back
Top