HOW IS SHE NOT ARRESTED FOR HER VIOLENT THREATS...?
Those are not legally threats. She didn't say she was going to do anything but that she had fantasies. Threats have to be addressed to specific individuals.
HOW IS SHE NOT ARRESTED FOR HER VIOLENT THREATS...?
I'd say anyone who publicly announces they fantasize about killing people and say it seriously as this person did, is someone making threats. It certainly is reason enough to ban her from owning a firearm if you are in favor of red flag laws. That's especially true given she spewed this vile stuff for nearly an hour to the listeners of her lecture.
just stop............you're helping the left with that crap
LOL. You wallow in bogus sites, and then ask idiotic questions based on your limited knowledge of the issue you brought up.
And you think that's adult discussion?
How quaint.
just stop............you're helping the left with that crap
Besides, we all have stated at least once in our lives that we wanted to kill somebody.
Are ALL of us licensed shrinks ???
I'd say anyone who publicly announces they fantasize about killing people and say it seriously as this person did, is someone making threats. It certainly is reason enough to ban her from owning a firearm if you are in favor of red flag laws. That's especially true given she spewed this vile stuff for nearly an hour to the listeners of her lecture.
That was a bad fantasy, not a threat. She is no danger. I doubt she owns a gun.
Again... You refuse to peruse credible sources, so you enter your own discussion with limited information.And... More you can't hold a cognitive and rational discussion on anything so you resort to ad hominem, insults, vitriol, and logical fallacies instead. Go back to the kiddie table, the adults are talking.
To answer your question, yes I do, and since you aren't an adult you missed figuring that out.
How come Yale didn't pull this immediately and disown anything to do with Dr. Khilanani? To have and allow such an overt bigot on campus to spew hatred and advocate for violence against others is unacceptable. How any university could allow such an insane quack to give such a lecture is beyond me.
Right up until she shoots a bunch of people like all the other crazies we've dismissed that said crap like that.
That was a bad fantasy, not a threat. She is no danger. I doubt she owns a gun.

Are ALL of us licensed shrinks ???
Be honest; if Trump has said this about Blacks or Mexicans, the Lefties in the US would have been screaming like stuck pigs. LOL
The fact remains, like Trump, she's a "provocative speaker". More colloquially, a "shit-stirrer". Yale refused to endorse her. OTOH, let's hope universities have the same level of tolerance for RW shit stirrers.
What would be the reaction if someone gave this speech at Yale: "I had fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any black or brown person that got in my way, burying their body, and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step. Like I did the world a fucking favor"?
My guess is there'd be even more pearl-clutching than TA Gardner is expressing.![]()
Again... You refuse to peruse credible sources, so you enter your own discussion with limited information.
As such, you appear to be clueless as you embarrass yourself.
Yale posted this: "The video was eventually posted with a disclaimer saying “the ideas expressed by the speaker conflict with the core values of Yale School of Medicine,” according to Yale’s statement.
Yale’s disclaimer read: “This video contains profanity and imagery of violence. Yale School of Medicine expects the members of our community to speak respectfully to one another and to avoid the use of profanity as a matter of professionalism and acknowledgment of our common humanity. Yale School of Medicine does not condone imagery of violence or racism against any group.”
How long have you been with the Cancel Culture, TA?
Soooo.....like the LWL Gun-Grabbers, you want to arrest and imprison people before they've committed crimes?
I suggested that those who want red flag laws should be clamoring for her firearms to be confiscated. That is what they propose with those laws.
And if she doesn't own guns, then what?