It is highly likely that Tucker will hit this hard again tonight.
I was right.
AGAIN.
It is highly likely that Tucker will hit this hard again tonight.
It is highly likely that Tucker will hit this hard again tonight.
This is a great example of why Power is working so hard to silence Tucker.
I piss all over the Murdock kids on a somewhat regular basis, but standing with Tucker they get credit for.
Remember when the FBI tried convincing a depressed Muslim kid to commit a mass shooting and arrested him when he wouldn't?
But in this case all the crazies attacked the Capitol. Claiming "the FBI made me do it" is no better a defense than "Donald Trump told me to do it."
"Tucker Carlson claims FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol, his latest whitewashing of Jan. 6"
"In his most severe rewriting of history on the January 6 insurrection at the US Capitol, Fox News opinion host Tucker Carlson baselessly claimed the riot was organized by the FBI."
"His claim relies solely on assuming that anyone listed anonymously as an "unindicted co-conspirator" must have been an FBI agent. Carlson went even further to claim the agents plotted the attack, implying it may not have happened without them."
"Although Carlson kept referring to government documents, he did not show any"
"Carlson promotes conspiracy that FBI planned Capitol riot"
https://www.cnn.com/videos/business...px.cnn/video/playlists/this-week-in-politics/
"Republicans blame FBI for Capitol riot in new conspiracy"
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...carlson-capitol-riot-conspiracy-b1867375.html
So, who's next, the Dingo?
It was absolutely NOT Trump’s idea to storm the Capitol.
The FBI has a track record of trying to entice foreign terrorists into action. There was an instance with a gullible Muslim some years ago. So, whether or not they were ‘encouraging’ some of these groups to act is a very legitimate question.
And there’s only one way to find out. Democrats should encourage this because they are determined to investigate 1/6 top to bottom.
It is not a legitimate question unless we have some evidence that it might have occurred. What they did in the past regarding foreign terrorist is not evidence. Certainly Tucker Carlson's rants have no credibility.
Because someone encouraged someone to do something that is not a defense. We heard Trump tell them to "stop the count" and "fight," but those comments do not constitute inciting a riot. Trying to blame this on the FBI is a desperate attempt to defend the indefensible. They should take responsibility for their actions and Trump supporters should not be defending them by trying to blame someone else. Previously they said it was Antifa or "leftist agitators." They attacked the Capitol--man up.
But in this case all the crazies attacked the Capitol. Claiming "the FBI made me do it" is no better a defense than "Donald Trump told me to do it."
If the entire basis of the alleged crime is federal agencies entrapping retards then maybe those feds should just stop baiting retards into being retardded.
The FBI has a rather long record of enticing crazies into claiming that they desire to do terrorism so that they can make a big splash in an arrest, which they do by having people who answer to the FBI leading conspiracies to do terrorism....this is totally inside of their wheelhouse.
The FBI has a rather long record of enticing crazies into claiming that they desire to do terrorism so that they can make a big splash in an arrest, which they do by having people who answer to the FBI leading conspiracies to do terrorism....this is totally inside of their wheelhouse.


There is evidence. How is it possible to have un-indicted co-conspirators named with numbers *unless* they were government agents?
This is simple: name the co-conspirators and give a yes/no as to whether they were federal agents. If the answer is no, we move on. If the answer is yes, there is more explanation needed.
When we twenty or whatever years ago noticed that the FBI was making a habit of baiting retards for fame and glory more of us could have said something.
I did my part.
The FBI has a rather long record of enticing crazies into claiming that they desire to do terrorism so that they can make a big splash in an arrest, which they do by having people who answer to the FBI leading conspiracies to do terrorism....this is totally inside of their wheelhouse.
"Tucker Carlson claims FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol, his latest whitewashing of Jan. 6"
"In his most severe rewriting of history on the January 6 insurrection at the US Capitol, Fox News opinion host Tucker Carlson baselessly claimed the riot was organized by the FBI."
"His claim relies solely on assuming that anyone listed anonymously as an "unindicted co-conspirator" must have been an FBI agent. Carlson went even further to claim the agents plotted the attack, implying it may not have happened without them."
"Although Carlson kept referring to government documents, he did not show any"
"Carlson promotes conspiracy that FBI planned Capitol riot"
https://www.cnn.com/videos/business...px.cnn/video/playlists/this-week-in-politics/
"Republicans blame FBI for Capitol riot in new conspiracy"
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...carlson-capitol-riot-conspiracy-b1867375.html
So, who's next, the Dingo?
There is evidence. How is it possible to have un-indicted co-conspirators named with numbers *unless* they were government agents?
This is simple: name the co-conspirators and give a yes/no as to whether they were federal agents. If the answer is no, we move on. If the answer is yes, there is more explanation needed.
The NYC police and the FBI actually had "undercover" cops inciting riots back in the day during Civil Rights protests. Literally hired to go in and convince people to act out violently.