That settles it, the FBI did it

This is a great example of why Power is working so hard to silence Tucker.

I piss all over the Murdock kids on a somewhat regular basis, but standing with Tucker they get credit for.

No one is trying to get rid of Tucker, pointing out his idiocy isn’t trying to get rid of him, why is it the MAGA militia always think media martyr when one of their icons is exposed as a fraud?

And of course the Murdochs aren’t going to dump Tucker, he’s selling tickets, making them money, there’s a reason all these demagogues turn themselves into millionaires preying upon wingers as yourself
 
Remember when the FBI tried convincing a depressed Muslim kid to commit a mass shooting and arrested him when he wouldn't?

But in this case all the crazies attacked the Capitol. Claiming "the FBI made me do it" is no better a defense than "Donald Trump told me to do it."
 
But in this case all the crazies attacked the Capitol. Claiming "the FBI made me do it" is no better a defense than "Donald Trump told me to do it."

It was absolutely NOT Trump’s idea to storm the Capitol.

The FBI has a track record of trying to entice foreign terrorists into action. There was an instance with a gullible Muslim some years ago. So, whether or not they were ‘encouraging’ some of these groups to act is a very legitimate question.

And there’s only one way to find out. Democrats should encourage this because they are determined to investigate 1/6 top to bottom.
 
"Tucker Carlson claims FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol, his latest whitewashing of Jan. 6"

"In his most severe rewriting of history on the January 6 insurrection at the US Capitol, Fox News opinion host Tucker Carlson baselessly claimed the riot was organized by the FBI."

"His claim relies solely on assuming that anyone listed anonymously as an "unindicted co-conspirator" must have been an FBI agent. Carlson went even further to claim the agents plotted the attack, implying it may not have happened without them."

"Although Carlson kept referring to government documents, he did not show any"

"Carlson promotes conspiracy that FBI planned Capitol riot"
https://www.cnn.com/videos/business...px.cnn/video/playlists/this-week-in-politics/

"Republicans blame FBI for Capitol riot in new conspiracy"
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...carlson-capitol-riot-conspiracy-b1867375.html

So, who's next, the Dingo?


Fucker Carlson has become a caricature. He's not a news reporter. He's an actor playing a part, reading a script. Nothing more. Nothing less.

This latest conspiracy theory was probably dreamed up but the RNC and emailed to FoxNews.

They're really getting desperate. Trump really fucked the GQP in the ass and it'll take years, maybe decades for them to recover.
 
It was absolutely NOT Trump’s idea to storm the Capitol.

The FBI has a track record of trying to entice foreign terrorists into action. There was an instance with a gullible Muslim some years ago. So, whether or not they were ‘encouraging’ some of these groups to act is a very legitimate question.

And there’s only one way to find out. Democrats should encourage this because they are determined to investigate 1/6 top to bottom.

It is not a legitimate question unless we have some evidence that it might have occurred. What they did in the past regarding foreign terrorist is not evidence. Certainly Tucker Carlson's rants have no credibility.

Because someone encouraged someone to do something that is not a defense. We heard Trump tell them to "stop the count" and "fight," but those comments do not constitute inciting a riot. Trying to blame this on the FBI is a desperate attempt to defend the indefensible. They should take responsibility for their actions and Trump supporters should not be defending them by trying to blame someone else. Previously they said it was Antifa or "leftist agitators." They attacked the Capitol--man up.
 
It is not a legitimate question unless we have some evidence that it might have occurred. What they did in the past regarding foreign terrorist is not evidence. Certainly Tucker Carlson's rants have no credibility.

Because someone encouraged someone to do something that is not a defense. We heard Trump tell them to "stop the count" and "fight," but those comments do not constitute inciting a riot. Trying to blame this on the FBI is a desperate attempt to defend the indefensible. They should take responsibility for their actions and Trump supporters should not be defending them by trying to blame someone else. Previously they said it was Antifa or "leftist agitators." They attacked the Capitol--man up.

There is evidence. How is it possible to have un-indicted co-conspirators named with numbers *unless* they were government agents?

This is simple: name the co-conspirators and give a yes/no as to whether they were federal agents. If the answer is no, we move on. If the answer is yes, there is more explanation needed.
 
But in this case all the crazies attacked the Capitol. Claiming "the FBI made me do it" is no better a defense than "Donald Trump told me to do it."

If the entire basis of the alleged crime is federal agencies entrapping retards then maybe those feds should just stop baiting retards into being retardded.
 
If the entire basis of the alleged crime is federal agencies entrapping retards then maybe those feds should just stop baiting retards into being retardded.

When we twenty or whatever years ago noticed that the FBI was making a habit of baiting retards for fame and glory more of us could have said something.

I did my part.
 
The FBI confiscated the videos Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell made of world leaders, titans of industry, and A-list celebrities having sex with underage girls. The FBIs job is to protect these child rapists from prosecution and lawsuits with illusion and misdirection. Dems spent 5 years talking about Russiagate while avoiding how many times Bill Clinton flew the Lolita Express.
 

Two explanations for all handwringing and the first one obviously true:

1) democrats want/need 1/6 to be all about Trump and Trump supporters, top to bottom. So anything that might take away from that needs to be suppressed

2) they are afraid there might something to it. It would be an unmitigated disaster for democrats if it turns if 1/6 happened—even in part, because undercover agents were ‘nudging things along’.

Number one is Captain Obvious stuff. Number two is at least plausible, though democrats can’t admit it.

And there’s only one way to find out.
 
The FBI has a rather long record of enticing crazies into claiming that they desire to do terrorism so that they can make a big splash in an arrest, which they do by having people who answer to the FBI leading conspiracies to do terrorism....this is totally inside of their wheelhouse.

you are such a stupid fuck clown. who was in charge of the FBI when trump started this insurrection? who was in charge of all homeland security and CIA assets and programs? TRUMP PICKS. along with a dumbfuck pig trump sucking attorney general. somehow the FBI made hundreds of stupid fuck trump voter goons attack the Congress and try to overthrow the results of the election?
 
The FBI has a rather long record of enticing crazies into claiming that they desire to do terrorism so that they can make a big splash in an arrest, which they do by having people who answer to the FBI leading conspiracies to do terrorism....this is totally inside of their wheelhouse.

Yes Hawkeye, the FBI went to hundreds of Trumptards and enticed them to storm the capitol. It wasn't Trump telling them to do it, it was FBI vulcan mind meld.

:rofl2::rofl2:

Your brand of insane is unique, I'll give you that.
 
There is evidence. How is it possible to have un-indicted co-conspirators named with numbers *unless* they were government agents?

This is simple: name the co-conspirators and give a yes/no as to whether they were federal agents. If the answer is no, we move on. If the answer is yes, there is more explanation needed.

Government agents are not committing criminal acts and therefore cannot be un-indicted co-conspirators.

Have there ever been government agents working undercover who were un-indicted co-conspirators?
 
When we twenty or whatever years ago noticed that the FBI was making a habit of baiting retards for fame and glory more of us could have said something.

I did my part.

I thought those Trump supporters attacking the Capitol were "patriots." So, they were "retard patriots?"

Who did you say something to?
 
The FBI has a rather long record of enticing crazies into claiming that they desire to do terrorism so that they can make a big splash in an arrest, which they do by having people who answer to the FBI leading conspiracies to do terrorism....this is totally inside of their wheelhouse.

The NYC police and the FBI actually had "undercover" cops inciting riots back in the day during Civil Rights protests. Literally hired to go in and convince people to act out violently.
 
"Tucker Carlson claims FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol, his latest whitewashing of Jan. 6"

"In his most severe rewriting of history on the January 6 insurrection at the US Capitol, Fox News opinion host Tucker Carlson baselessly claimed the riot was organized by the FBI."

"His claim relies solely on assuming that anyone listed anonymously as an "unindicted co-conspirator" must have been an FBI agent. Carlson went even further to claim the agents plotted the attack, implying it may not have happened without them."

"Although Carlson kept referring to government documents, he did not show any"

"Carlson promotes conspiracy that FBI planned Capitol riot"
https://www.cnn.com/videos/business...px.cnn/video/playlists/this-week-in-politics/

"Republicans blame FBI for Capitol riot in new conspiracy"
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...carlson-capitol-riot-conspiracy-b1867375.html

So, who's next, the Dingo?


I wonder how many Right Wing Trump dick-suckers actually believe this one.
 
There is evidence. How is it possible to have un-indicted co-conspirators named with numbers *unless* they were government agents?

This is simple: name the co-conspirators and give a yes/no as to whether they were federal agents. If the answer is no, we move on. If the answer is yes, there is more explanation needed.

It seems you don't know shit about how indictments work.
The US Attorney's manual states that "federal prosecutors should not identify unindicted co-conspirators in conspiracy indictments."

That is pretty simple stuff based on court rulings. Unindicted co-conspirators are not named because they do not have the ability to clear their name during a trial. It has nothing to do with them being federal agents. It has everything to do with not smearing the name of someone not indicted.

Of course in some cases it is pretty easy to figure out who Individual 1 is and know for sure that they are not FBI. I'm sure even you know who Individual 1 is.
 
The NYC police and the FBI actually had "undercover" cops inciting riots back in the day during Civil Rights protests. Literally hired to go in and convince people to act out violently.

I'll take your word for it but I said at the jump that it was highly likely that Left Radicals were at least very active on social media pre Jan 6 working up Conservatives while claiming to be Conservatives, and that highly skilled key operatives were likely on the ground doing their best to create violence on Jan 6. I also said that the complete failure of the security forces on Jan 6 was highly suspicious.

But here is the thing....I constantly am getting educated that America is in more trouble than I had figured....that "As cynical as I get I am still Naive" in the words of Bret.

Buckle Up.
 
Back
Top