Did you know this prior to the conversation - or is it something you just googled?
post 32. 2nd link
Did you know this prior to the conversation - or is it something you just googled?
lolYou forgot to post the rest.
“Any virus is going to try to keep changing so it can continue to spread. For COVID-19, that means we’ll likely see more new variants as more people are vaccinated. That’s natural and expected. Don’t be too worried about it, the vaccine should help keep us safe. But, that’s why it’s so important for experts to work together around the world to track the COVID-19 variants. It’s also important for you to continue doing your part by getting vaccinated as soon as you become eligible to get the COVID-19 vaccine,” Dr. Rosa says.
Care to explain why you think there is a contradiction in this sentence? Be specific.
The vaccines will not create variants but it may allow variants that mutate to avoid the vaccine to become prevalent.
Changing which mutation survives is not the same thing as creating the mutation. Your stupidity is amazing for someone that claims to be a medical professional.
Assuming that acquired immunity is as good as the vaccine that is true but we are not dealing with 100% of the people not getting the vaccine have already had Covid.you TOTALLY blew right past acquired immunity from COVID exposure.
If you learned that then you need to go soak your head and start over.What we learned thanks to ARCHIVES is that the vaxx itself drives mutations -
The replication process is about the only way that mutations can happen. The other way is modification of RNA/DNA by radiation of something else that actually changes the RNA/DNA strand when it isn't replicating. Vaccines don't change the RNA of a virus.(although im pretty sure the RNA replication process is where most mutations happen) ;you post is full of fallacies and incomplete data
post 32. 2nd link
JFC. take you stupidity elsewhere.how can a virus mutate after vaccines have eradicated it?
think before you post moron
JFC. take you stupidity elsewhere.
virus are never "eradicated" -
For nearly a year, the CCP Virus plodded along without producing any variants until the vaccines came on the scene—and then boom.
Coincidence? Or are the vaccines stimulating evolutionary changes in the COVID19 genome?
Because virology is complicated and you don't know anything. Next.

For starters I’ll cut you some slack and ignore the absolute claim.
You start out by saying the vaccines *will not* create variants; then go on to contradict yourself by saying the vaccines may allow variants that mutate to avoid the vaccines to become more prevalent.
There is zero practical difference between vaccines creating vaccine resistant strains and strains that ‘mutate to avoid the vaccine’. At least I can’t make any sense out of it. Unless your argument rests on semantics.
doesnt matter. herd immunity doesnt require 100% immunity in a populationAssuming that acquired immunity is as good as the vaccine that is true but we are not dealing with 100% of the people not getting the vaccine have already had Covid.
oh gee so now you pipe up after the info is disclosed.. have you heard ANYONE say "vaxxing can cause mutations"?If you learned that then you need to go soak your head and start over.
what? where do you get "radiation" are you trying to say" effecting" and chose the wrong medical term?RNA/DNA by radiation of something else that actually changes the RNA/DNA strand when it isn't replicating. Vaccines don't change the RNA of a virus.
bullshit. what a dumbass you are. it is the time the virus has to be in the general population that creates variants, you silly ass bitch. vaccines are the way to stop the mutating, dumbfuck.

the PRESENCE of a vaxx, causes a mutation - i would ASS U ME that the mutation is caused by the virus attempting to overcome the vaxx properties ( stimulation of antibodies) , so no Vaxxes do cause RNA mutations
The reason it happens with bacteria should be a warning you would understand if you were truly a medical professional.
There would be antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria in the absence of antibiotics. It's just they would have no advantage over non resistant strains so may or may not be able to become the dominant strain depending on other factors. Are you sure you ever took a biology course? You don't seem to know the first thing about DNA, RNA or evolution.
is polio still a problem knucklehead?
his terminology is so shitty/elastic it's difficult to understand what he is yammeringYou don’t know what you’re talking about lol.
You keep contradicting yourself. Streptomycin resistant strains don’t occur in the wild because—as you said yourself, the mutation which confers resistance to Streptomycin is useless in the wild. If the strain did happen to pop up, the mutation would quickly be ‘selected out’ in several generations because that particular mutation provides no survival advantage in the wild.
The so-called ‘super bugs’ are only ‘super’ in an environment where antibiotics are commonly used—especially hospitals. In fact, it’s commonly thought that antibiotic resistant bacteria would disappear if antibiotics fell out of use. I can’t think of why that wouldn’t be true.
I’ve taken my share of ‘biology courses’ but thanks for enquiring.
Polio does still exist, although polio cases have decreased by over 99% since 1988, from an estimated more than 350 000 cases to 22 reported cases in 2017. This reduction is the result of the global effort to eradicate the disease.
For nearly a year, the CCP Virus plodded along without producing any variants until the vaccines came on the scene—and then boom.
Coincidence? Or are the vaccines stimulating evolutionary changes in the COVID19 genome?