First victim of political prosecution of 1/6 receives sentence

You watch the rest of these assholes, he got off easy.

217387367_5337482503011427_5740546424872995245_n.jpg
 
Oh my! Big scary nazi! How about the shit stains responsible for the deaths and injuries to cops in last summer’s riots?

The call is coming from inside your house:

Far-right ‘boogaloo boys’ linked to killing of California law officers and other violence
https://www.latimes.com/california/...o-killing-of-california-lawmen-other-violence

Your "very fine people" were the ones killing and attacking cops to try and frame BLM:

Far-Right ‘Boogaloo Boys’ Are Trying to Incite Violence at Protests
https://www.rollingstone.com/cultur...ge-floyd-protests-black-lives-matter-1010117/

The tactics your "very fine people" use are the ones the Nazis used between 1921 - 1933.
 
The Justice Department says at least 230 of them have been charged with the same obstruction-of-Congress crime to which Hodgkins pleaded guilty.

The judge said Hodgkins got of easy because he plead guilt early and apologized for his actions. The shitheads that are going to fight this in court will get much longer sentences. How the dumbshits are going to plead not-guilty when their fucking pictures will be there for all to see is amazing. Trumpers are so fucking stupid.
 
Oh my! Big scary nazi! How about the shit stains responsible for the deaths and injuries to cops in last summer’s riots?

https://tnc.news/2020/06/10/a-comprehensive-list-of-police-officers-injured-or-killed-in-us-riots/

Oh but c’mon man! We know you’re full of shit. You’re a jackass! You couldn’t even touch a firearm without puking and shitting your panties. Even if you knew which end was dangerous.

I'd say stick the fuckers in jail, were they charged?
 
Let's start with discarding the bill of rights for mass subservience, data collection, and militarized police.

What statute are you claiming they violated? Again, be specific. You just vomited a bunch of talking points. Try again.
 
Article III, Section 3, Clause 1:

Nope. That is not a criminal statute. Do you have a specific statute you allege that these members of Congress have violated. You don't know the difference between the Constitution and the law? Maybe you should take a remedial class before you start posting again.
 
Nope. That is not a criminal statute. Do you have a specific statute you allege that these members of Congress have violated. You don't know the difference between the Constitution and the law? Maybe you should take a remedial class before you start posting again.

bill of rights
 
Once again, you are simply ill informed. Speculation is not fact.

The facts are supported by video and picture evidence. He carried a Trump flag but did not have a weapon with him or attack anyone. I suggest you read the comments by the judge. Personally, I think 8 months is light for what he did but his taking responsibility and showing remorse are in his favor. His failure to turn around and leave when he saw the violence of others works against him.

So, witnessing violence is a crime to?

Everyone agrees the actually violent 1/6 rioters deserve the full force of the law. But non-violent first time offenders—should be treated like non-violent first time offenders. If nothing else, this person should have had a speedy trial in like—February, once it became apparent he wasn’t engaged in the violence.

There’s no excuse, especially when so many of the actually violent leftists go Scott free. If they are even apprehended.
 
Back
Top