Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Actually we are. They're called eyes.
Eyes of a dead mother at this point...
Actually we are. They're called eyes.
Exactly. It's a dumb OP.The OP title is not something that should ever be said.
You mean you would?Would liberals be sticking up for Charlton Heston if it were him who shot someone on a movie set? Why don't I think they would?
Again he was aiming for the camera.So why the fuck did Baldwin point a gun that presumably he did not check in the direction of multiple people then pull the trigger? Sounds negligent to me.
Sent from my LM-X210(G) using Tapatalk
It's an old shit of a phone.What is an LM-XQZ345(G) ?
It's an old shit of a phone.
Sent from my LM-X210(G) using Tapatalk
Probably will.Why don’t you get a new one?
Probably will.
Sent from my LM-X210(G) using Tapatalk
And the people behind the camera. More the reason to personally make sure the gun is unloaded.Again he was aiming for the camera.
Sent from my LM-X210(G) using Tapatalk
EVERYONE should be held to the EXACT same standard of safety. The gun does not care who is pulling the trigger. I you aren't capable of following a FEW basic gun safety rules then don't touch the gun its not a toy.Actually, since Charlton Heston was a big NRA guy,
it WOULD be totally reasonable to hold him to a higher standard than Alec Baldwin
in matters of firearms safety.
And the people behind the camera. More the reason to personally make sure the gun is unloaded.
Evidence? There is a dead woman that was struck by a lead projectile from a gun that Baldwin shot. The sheriff says there was a live round in the gun. What more evidence do you need?Originally Posted by RB 60
Would liberals be sticking up for Charlton Heston if it were him who shot someone on a movie set? Why don't I think they would?
Nobody is sticking up for Baldwin beyond the point where reason ends. They are sticking up to the extent rightees are holding him culpable
without evidence. When will you dumbshits cast your prejudices aside and let thought and evidence guide your utterances?
So they were behind Baldwin??How do you know their relative positions?
So they were behind Baldwin??
Being stupid does not help your argument either.Being funny doesn't help your argument.
Being stupid does not help your argument either.
And the OP was to advanced for you.Apparently the question is too advanced for you.