It’s what these men want
To make women lesser beings than men under the law
A person with a penis can own the body of a woman
You love all those black babies that are aborted
It’s what these men want
To make women lesser beings than men under the law
A person with a penis can own the body of a woman
You love all those black babies that are aborted
”Does a mother have a right to ingest drugs and harm a pre-viable baby? Can the state bring child neglect charges against the mother?
View attachment 21384
Both should have rights.
Want to end abortion?
All men are forcibly altered
Sound fair?
So, do you have the right to HARM a pre-viable baby?
In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that the fetus' had a inherent constitutionally protected right is the right to be born
”Does a mother have a right to ingest drugs and harm a pre-viable baby? Can the state bring child neglect charges against the mother?
Both should have rights.
fetuses should have the same rights as a kidney or liver. until they are alive. then they have human rights.
fetuses should have the same rights as a kidney or liver. until they are alive. then they have human rights.
. Imagine a pregnant woman posted to facebook a video of herself enjoying an alcoholic beverage and a cigarette smoking crack etc. Heads would explode. But if same woman “shouts her abortion,” it’d be nothing but “Attagirl!” from the very same crowd.
Not everyone is a christer
Jewish law does not share the belief common among abortion opponents that life begins at conception, nor does it legally consider the fetus to be a full person deserving of protections equal those accorded to human beings. In Jewish law, a fetus attains the status of a full person only at birth. Sources in the Talmud indicate that prior to 40 days of gestation, the fetus has an even more limited legal status, with one Talmudic authority (Yevamot 69b) asserting that prior to 40 days the fetus is “mere water.” Elsewhere, the Talmud indicates that the ancient rabbis regarded a fetus as part of its mother throughout the pregnancy, dependent fully on her for its life — a view that echoes the position that women should be free to make decisions concerning their own bodies.
One must wade though a lot of nonsense and lies at JPP.
Thanks for all of your recent likes.
Only in the minds of fools. Abortions have always been legal in this country since its Founding. Roe simply made it a Constitutional "right". If Thomas does not understand this simple fact he should not be a Justice. And we do have feticide laws.

”Does a mother have a right to ingest drugs and harm a pre-viable baby? Can the state bring child neglect charges against the mother?
View attachment 21384
To a mother that doesn't want it, an embryo or fetus is no different than a malignant tumor.
That's my position morally.

It is a stupid question, wasn't Thomas' opening question, and didn't terrify anyone, in fact, it was dismissively answered and procedures quickly moved on to Justice Robert's questions
Thomas has more intelligence in his little finger than all you leftists combined. I wish YOU could understand anything.
It isn't in the Constitution. It's a State Right issue.![]()