evince
Truthmatters
Yes it is. That's why killing a pregnant woman counts as a double murder.
Because it’s a viable fetus inside the woman
You killed her in so preventing her choice to carry the fetus till birth
Her choice
Yes it is. That's why killing a pregnant woman counts as a double murder.
Because I oppose murder and think it should be a crime, hot take I know.
How many times do I need to fix this for you, Expressweenie?
Nope the minute that they chose to have unprotected sex, they tacitly contracted to lease that womb to another human renter (half whom also have wombs). There is an implied contract that most couples understand..
the constitution prohibits arbitrary standards......"reasonable" needs to be sustained by biological evidence.......nothing significant happens in fetal development on the first day of the second trimester......
First trimester cutoff is a reasonable standard. A line has to be drawn somewhere unless you want abortion ten seconds before birth. A first trimester cutoff is no more arbitrary than a 35 mph speed limit. Authorities make a reasonable assessment of what a safe speed is and if you go a few mph over it nothing significant happens except the fact that you get a ticket.
Either instance is murder. No way to hide it or change reality. Rolling a turd in powdered sugar does not make it a confection.Because it’s a viable fetus inside the woman
You killed her in so preventing her choice to carry the fetus till birth
Her choice
Because your a want to be rapist is why
I’m sure you want to threaten me again huh
Because your a want to be rapist is why
I’m sure you want to threaten me again huh
Abortion is the taking of innocent human life . Period. In California and many other states you can be convicted of the murder of an unborn child. Ask Scott Peterson. He killed his wife and his unborn son and was convicted of BOTH murders.But abortion is not murder, it is just your opinion.
Right, wasn't there an implied right to own a slave at one time?
There you go.
No, this is only the beginning now we need to get the seats and Presidency so we can enact federal legislation banning abortion nation wide.
Either instance is murder. No way to hide it or change reality. Rolling a turd in powdered sugar does not make it a confection.
Now I really would like to see the court case where hospital staff testified that a birthed child was subsequently murdered by the attending doctor/surgeon. I'll give you all the time in the world to produce that case.
Christo-fascists only believe in the right of couples when they are agreement with their ideology.
70% is against the decision. Tell me how it is democracy again.
Democracy did not make that decision in the first place. It was imposed on the people by the Supreme Court which took the decision away from the people in the states.
Jim Crow laws were in the hands of the states.
And Jim Crow laws were found unconstitutional by overruling precedent and through the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
States also pioneered laws on same sex marriage, providing attorneys for the indigent, health insurance, women's right to vote, 18 year-old vote, abortion, and others long before any federal action on these issues.
Thank you. Now you are starting to get it.
Agreed, that overturning precedent is often progress and better constitutional law and that states are often more progressive than the feds.
I always got that.