Do you support bombing Iran back to the "Stone Ages"?

How did you conclude the bolded?



Among others. If you peruse any Leftist to radical Leftist site they're proclaiming America lost and Iran won. Their tenor is one of rooting for Iran and being against America totally.
 



Among others. If you peruse any Leftist to radical Leftist site they're proclaiming America lost and Iran won. Their tenor is one of rooting for Iran and being against America totally.

None of those are scientific. One is literally Trump saying it's the "radical left." All 3 are opinion pieces.

Did you just google and take the first 3 links?

Most polls show a majority of Americans opposing this war. And that includes prominent voices on the right.
 
None of those are scientific. One is literally Trump saying it's the "radical left." All 3 are opinion pieces.

Did you just google and take the first 3 links?

Most polls show a majority of Americans opposing this war. And that includes prominent voices on the right.
Trivial objections fallacy on your part. I put up far more evidence in support of my position than you ever have of yours.
 
You're kidding here, right?

"Trivial?" You posted 3 opinion pieces. That's not evidence at all.

Look up any poll on the war. It's not just the "radical left."

My goodness.
Trivial. It could also be considered an Appeal to the Stone fallacy on your part.

9nu139.jpg
 
Then source those facts.
Now you are just making a demand for more proof fallacy in the form of trivial objections. Why not read the articles, find which things in them are not valid points or factual and then make a counter argument using facts of your own to show how the articles are wrong?

Right now, you are dismissing my argument and the supporting articles and facts I gave out-of-hand with nothing, yet demanding I prove even more than I already have.
 
This is unserious.

Opinion pieces aren't proof of anything. By their very nature, they are not "facts."

Posting Trump saying it's the "radical left" isn't proof of anything, aside from the fact that he blames the radical left for lots of stuff.
By your standard, nothing written by anyone has any validity. That's absurd on its face.
 
By your standard, nothing written by anyone has any validity. That's absurd on its face.

That's not a logical conclusion either. I said nothing to indicate that.

Sorry - this discussion isn't going anywhere. You posted opinion - not facts. Some opinions ARE valid, but generally only when they're based on facts.

Most Americans oppose the war. Again - even prominent voices on the right.
 
That's not a logical conclusion either. I said nothing to indicate that.

Sorry - this discussion isn't going anywhere. You posted opinion - not facts. Some opinions ARE valid, but generally only when they're based on facts.

Most Americans oppose the war. Again - even prominent voices on the right.
Sure you did. You dismissed my sources, all of them, out-of-hand as "opinion pieces" without giving me a single sentence of rebuttal or countering facts.
 
Sure you did. You dismissed my sources, all of them, out-of-hand as "opinion pieces" without giving me a single sentence of rebuttal or countering facts.

People only counter w/ facts when there are facts to counter.

Trump talking about the "radical left" isn't a fact. And besides - I pointed out what the polls say, pretty consistently.

Do you think your sources were something other than opinion pieces? Was I wrong?
 
People only counter w/ facts when there are facts to counter.

Trump talking about the "radical left" isn't a fact. And besides - I pointed out what the polls say, pretty consistently.

Do you think your sources were something other than opinion pieces? Was I wrong?
Since you clearly never read any of the articles I posted you never got to figuring out if there were facts to counter or not (and yes, there were facts in those articles). So, yes, you were wrong.
 
Back
Top