@T. A. Gardner makes it larger than it really is.How did you conclude the bolded?
@T. A. Gardner makes it larger than it really is.How did you conclude the bolded?
How did you conclude the bolded?
No, I made it what it actually is.@T. A. Gardner makes it larger than it really is.
![]()
Iran Conflict Reveals the Left Opposes War, Rejects Peace, and Lives Only to Oppose Trump - Johnathan Jones
The loudest voices on the left clutched their pearls when the first strikes in Iran began in February, warning of catastrophe and insisting that escalation would be reckless, immoral, and […]qoshe.com
![]()
Trump Says “The Radical Left, Country Hating Democrats Are Trying to Create Inner Chaos to Take Away From the Great Military Achievement We Are Having in Iran,” Boasting Success in Iran — “They Hate Seeing Us WIN so Completely and Decisively” - NewsB
President Donald Trump said in a Truth Social post on March 25 that Democrats are attempting to undermine what he described as a major U.S. military succeswww.newsbreak.com
![]()
What America Has Lost in the War With Iran
Iran appears to have emerged as the winner in Donald Trump’s war of choice.www.americanprogress.org
Among others. If you peruse any Leftist to radical Leftist site they're proclaiming America lost and Iran won. Their tenor is one of rooting for Iran and being against America totally.
Less?No, I made it what it actually is.
@T. A. Gardner sure loves to pass around the opinion pieces as if they're facts.None of those are scientific. One is literally Trump saying it's the "radical left." All 3 are opinion pieces.
Most polls show a majority of Americans opposing this war. And that includes prominent voices on the right.
Trivial objections fallacy on your part. I put up far more evidence in support of my position than you ever have of yours.None of those are scientific. One is literally Trump saying it's the "radical left." All 3 are opinion pieces.
Did you just google and take the first 3 links?
Most polls show a majority of Americans opposing this war. And that includes prominent voices on the right.
Trivial objections fallacy on your part. I put up far more evidence in support of my position than you ever have of yours.
Opinion pieces often contain lots of facts and verifiable information as the basis for forming those opinions. You are just making an Appeal to the Stone fallacy.@T. A. Gardner sure loves to pass around the opinion pieces as if they're facts.
Trivial. It could also be considered an Appeal to the Stone fallacy on your part.You're kidding here, right?
"Trivial?" You posted 3 opinion pieces. That's not evidence at all.
Look up any poll on the war. It's not just the "radical left."
My goodness.
Then source those facts.Opinion pieces often contain lots of facts and verifiable information as the basis for forming those opinions. You are just making an Appeal to the Stone fallacy.
Trivial. It could also be considered an Appeal to the Stone fallacy on your part.
Now you are just making a demand for more proof fallacy in the form of trivial objections. Why not read the articles, find which things in them are not valid points or factual and then make a counter argument using facts of your own to show how the articles are wrong?Then source those facts.
By your standard, nothing written by anyone has any validity. That's absurd on its face.This is unserious.
Opinion pieces aren't proof of anything. By their very nature, they are not "facts."
Posting Trump saying it's the "radical left" isn't proof of anything, aside from the fact that he blames the radical left for lots of stuff.
By your standard, nothing written by anyone has any validity. That's absurd on its face.
Sure you did. You dismissed my sources, all of them, out-of-hand as "opinion pieces" without giving me a single sentence of rebuttal or countering facts.That's not a logical conclusion either. I said nothing to indicate that.
Sorry - this discussion isn't going anywhere. You posted opinion - not facts. Some opinions ARE valid, but generally only when they're based on facts.
Most Americans oppose the war. Again - even prominent voices on the right.
Sure you did. You dismissed my sources, all of them, out-of-hand as "opinion pieces" without giving me a single sentence of rebuttal or countering facts.
Since you clearly never read any of the articles I posted you never got to figuring out if there were facts to counter or not (and yes, there were facts in those articles). So, yes, you were wrong.People only counter w/ facts when there are facts to counter.
Trump talking about the "radical left" isn't a fact. And besides - I pointed out what the polls say, pretty consistently.
Do you think your sources were something other than opinion pieces? Was I wrong?
He won't do it. He's dumb, but not that dumb.Do you wish to put the Iranian people into such a situation?
Is this just a Trump threat, or will he do that? If he does, would you support it?