Archaeology of the New Testament

I said before, is much more intellectually honest to say I don't know then come up with fairy tail beings to explain things.
You aren't actually professing a state of ignorance.
You've already insinuated that you basically know what the answer is: you are 100% certain inanimate, irrational, physical material causes somehow caused a lawfully organized and mathematically rational universe.
I pointed out a laundry list of examples that show there is no intelligent designer. Thoughts?
I stated that your examples of molars and wisdom teeth, or whatever were not examples of fine tuning, because they do not involve universal mathematical principles.
We are clearly back to the god of the gaps stuff that we discussed a while ago. We can't explain it? It must be a deity.
This isn't a a scientific question.

It's a philosophical question.
Either the rational and the material somehow comes from the irrational and the immaterial, or it doesn't.

Science is only the study of process. It doesn't explain the underlying teleological questions. We've been studying gravity for over 500 years, and while we can make accurate predictions about the process and effects of gravity, we still have no idea precisely why mass causes spacetime to deform, or why exactly a precise mathematical universal principle underlies gravity.
 
You aren't actually professing a state of ignorance.
You've already insinuated that you basically know what the answer is: you are 100% certain inanimate, irrational, physical material causes somehow caused a lawfully organized and mathematically rational universe.
I've already said that I am 99.999% certain that none of the gods that man has written about our real. Unless you can find some way to differentiate between yours and the thousands of others that man has believed in, why should I believe yours exist?
I stated that your examples of molars and wisdom teeth, or whatever were not examples of fine tuning, because they do not involve universal mathematical principles.
I gave multiple examples of how the universe is not finally tuned. It's actually anything but finally tuned, yet you cling to that as your soul basis for believing in your deity.
This isn't a a scientific question.

It's a philosophical question.
Either the rational and the material somehow comes from the irrational and the immaterial, or it doesn't.
I have never claimed that everything came into an assistance by some irrational means. All I've said is that I don't know how it came into existence. You are the one making claims about how it came into existence.
Science is only the study of process. It doesn't explain the underlying teleological questions. We've been studying gravity for over 500 years, and while we can make accurate predictions about the process and effects of gravity, we still have no idea precisely why mass causes spacetime to deform, or why exactly a precise mathematical universal principle underlies gravity.
Actually, there is a lot of gravity that we cannot account for and science only speculates on how it is created.

That gap in our knowledge is something that you would likely explain via a sky wizard.
 
You aren't actually professing a state of ignorance.
You've already insinuated that you basically know what the answer is: you are 100% certain inanimate, irrational, physical material causes somehow caused a lawfully organized and mathematically rational universe.

I stated that your examples of molars and wisdom teeth, or whatever were not examples of fine tuning, because they do not involve universal mathematical principles.

This isn't a a scientific question.

It's a philosophical question.
Either the rational and the material somehow comes from the irrational and the immaterial, or it doesn't.

Science is only the study of process. It doesn't explain the underlying teleological questions. We've been studying gravity for over 500 years, and while we can make accurate predictions about the process and effects of gravity, we still have no idea precisely why mass causes spacetime to deform, or why exactly a precise mathematical universal principle underlies gravity.
no.

he didn't say that.
 
I've already said that I am 99.999% certain that none of the gods that man has written about our real. Unless you can find some way to differentiate between yours and the thousands of others that man has believed in, why should I believe yours exist?


because he found caiphus's douche-nozzle.
 
RQAA

Inversion fallacy.

What money?
Still waiting, troll boy.
giphy.gif
 
Back
Top