Into the Night
Contributor
RQAAWhich book of the Bible did Jesus write?
RQAAWhich book of the Bible did Jesus write?
Psychoquackery. Presentism fallacy. Denying God and his gospel is not being a Christian.Most Christians do, to avoid worshipping a psychopath, so......
RQAA. Go back and read it.how so, idiot box?
Mantra 1a. Lame. Argument of the Stone fallacy.it is about importance.
some things are not important.
as an idiot, you don't realize that.
And you don't. You base your opinion on whatever Democrats tell you to say.Right, either you base your opinion on all available evidence or you don't.
YARP. Try English. It works better.Again, in your dogmatic views he's discarding the OT/NT.
The Universe is a random dust cloud. It is not organized at all. No math needed.You aren't actually professing a state of ignorance.
You've already insinuated that you basically know what the answer is: you are 100% certain inanimate, irrational, physical material causes somehow caused a lawfully organized and mathematically rational universe.
No, it is a denial of what is.I stated that your examples of molars and wisdom teeth, or whatever were not examples of fine tuning, because they do not involve universal mathematical principles.
This isn't a a scientific question.
You have no idea what philosophy is. Philosophy is not a question.It's a philosophical question.
Science is not the study of process. That is called 'engineering'.Either the rational and the material somehow comes from the irrational and the immaterial, or it doesn't.
Science is only the study of process. It doesn't explain the underlying teleological questions. We've been studying gravity for over 500 years, and while we can make accurate predictions about the process and effects of gravity, we still have no idea precisely why mass causes spacetime to deform, or why exactly a precise mathematical universal principle underlies gravity.
Nope. I look at all of the information, not just the information that supports what I want to believe.But you do anyway.
I base my opinion on all evidence. Evidence exists independent of, and is unrelated to, political party.And you don't. You base your opinion on whatever Democrats tell you to say.
Darwin did not create the Theory of Evolution, Cyborg. He created the Theory of Natural Selection, which has been falsified, since it creates a paradox.Provide an example of me ever saying I don't believe in Darwinian evolution.
You deny evidence.Nope. I look at all of the information, not just the information that supports what I want to believe.
You deny evidence.I base my opinion on all evidence. Evidence exists independent of, and is unrelated to, political party.
your take is not important.Mantra 1a. Lame. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
totally wrong.Darwin did not create the Theory of Evolution, Cyborg. He created the Theory of Natural Selection, which has been falsified, since it creates a paradox.
The Theory of Evolution was created in ancient Greece. It states that present day life evolved from more primitive forms.
The Theory of Evolution is a nonscientific theory and a religion.
Any 'relationship' assigned between species is pure conjecture.
The Theory of Natural Selection presupposes a variance to select from, but tends to eliminate that variance, thus eliminating the theory itself, since variance goes against natural selection. This creates a paradox. Over time, variance is lessened, yet selection itself requires a variance to select from.
Science has NO theories about past unobserved events, since they are not falsifiable.
Bulverism fallacy.your take is not important.
Which falsified the Theory of Natural Selection.totally wrong.
over time species differentiate and can become totally different.
Nope. I acknowledge all evidence.You deny evidence.
Nope. I acknowledge all evidence.You deny evidence.
This is absolutely hilarious. You claim Natural Selection has been falsified. Sure, by you, the same person who thinks biochemistry isn't a word.Darwin did not create the Theory of Evolution, Cyborg. He created the Theory of Natural Selection, which has been falsified, since it creates a paradox.
The Theory of Evolution was created in ancient Greece. It states that present day life evolved from more primitive forms.
The Theory of Evolution is a nonscientific theory and a religion.
Any 'relationship' assigned between species is pure conjecture.
The Theory of Natural Selection presupposes a variance to select from, but tends to eliminate that variance, thus eliminating the theory itself, since variance goes against natural selection. This creates a paradox. Over time, variance is lessened, yet selection itself requires a variance to select from.
Science has NO theories about past unobserved events, since they are not falsifiable.
Arranged in order of highest certainty to lower certainty:
Pilate stone: stone inscription identifying Pontius Pilate as Roman perfect of Judea from 26-36 ADOssuary of Caiaphas: inscribed bone box belonging to Caiaphas high priest of the Sanhedrin.Nazareth: Archeological remains of first-century agricultural village of Nazareth.Crucifixion evidence: Discovery of an ankle bone pierced with an iron nail, found in a first-century tomb, corroborating the description of Roman crucifixion practices.Pool of Bethesda: excavations of first-century pools matching the description in John's gospel.Garden of Gethsemane: excavations of first-century olive oil production site consistent with gospel descriptions of olive grove at foot of Mount of Olives.Ossuary of James, brother of Jesus: inscribed bone box possibly belonging to James, brother of Jesus.Ossuary of Judas Thaddeus: late first-century inscribed bone box found in Jezreel Valley, possibly belonging to the disciple Jude Thaddeus,