I'm asking you to quote one. How is that denying anything, Larry.
Stop being a screeching idiot and back your accusations up.
Entering your home without a warrant.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Stop being a screeching idiot and back your accusations up.
Oh boy, Smarter than Few has run to his chat-bot. (hat-tip Truth detector) What a dumbass. You really are this stupid.
The Supreme Court did not rule that the 4th Amendment only fails to apply to foreigners who are physically outside the country. They ruled that 'non-citizens' must have a 'substantial voluntary connection' to the United States before they get full constitutional protections you knuckle dragging moron. Having final removal papers is not a voluntary connection, lmfao.
Neither is anyone that's hiding their identity to avoid capture by the federal government. It's quite the opposite. You idiots can't comprehend this because you live in places that ignore federal law by inventing safe spaces for criminals. You think Mr. Abukar and Mrs. Sanchez down the road have all the same rights as law-abiding citizens, which allows Abukar to plan a shooting or bombing, and Mrs. Sanchez to live like a slave, working for trust fund activist punk who can threaten to make a certain phone call should she complain about wages or maybe even turn him in for a little ass grabbing or worse, lol. It's not funny at all actually. Untold suffering is caused by morons like you and most are so ignorant they have no idea. Others know all to well, but they're pure evil, so they enjoy it.
The Court explicitly rejected the idea that illegal aliens or non-citizens automatically get the same rights as American citizens just because they happen to be physically inside the country. That is the entire point of the ruling.
You dumbasses always twist this. The Constitution was written to protect 'the American people', not every illegal who sneaks across the border and plants his ass here. If you are here illegally, you do not enjoy the full menu of rights that citizens do. Courts have said this repeatedly. It's so common sense, it hurts. Would you give the same rights to a person that broke in your house? Wake up, you seem like the typical dumbass that just follows along to get along, but that's a horrible long-term plan.
Keep coping though, if that's your thing. But again, the Constitution is not a global suicide pact.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
this country is doomed because of the statist fucking morons out here
Into the Night
Contributor
DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS, STOOGE!
Into the Night
Contributor
Void argument fallacy.
The United States is just fine. It's still here. It's even getting ready to celebrate it's 250th anniversary!
I expect the pyrotechicians out there to outdo themselves!
SmarterthanYou
rebel
of course the 'country' is still here. Mainly because 95% of you out there willingly accept, sometimes even demand, that your lives be run by the government because you believe that freedom is scary. Soon the US will be similar to the CCP, where you're led to believe you're free, but you're really not.
Into the Night
Contributor
Argument from randU fallacy. It must suck to be so paranoid, dude. The United States is a federated republic. China is not. It is currently an oligarchy. Extreme argument fallacy.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
key word was 'SOON'. I see that's another reason why we are doomed. Too many of you are shortsighted and operate in a state of perpetual terror of what the other 'side' will do if they are in power. The elites are playing you like a kazoo
Into the Night
Contributor
It must really suck to be so paranoid, dude.
I think Democrats have made it pretty clear what they would do if they were in power.
That's why they are NOT in power.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Oh! You said search warrant.
WRONG! Arrest warrant is the correct answer.
Illegals pretty much have a standing arrest warrant, and yes house/apartment owners can let LEOs into where illegals or people with an arrest warrant are hiding. Don't be retarded, if the owner of a property gives permission to LEOs to search it for someone with an arrest warrant, they can, renters or not. If the owner denies them, then the LEOs have to get a search warrant.
Jarod is definitely not a criminal defense lawyer. There's no way he would be successful with what has been exhibited in this thread. Probably not a lawyer at all.
Last edited:
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Arrest warrants mean persons to be seized, retard.
Derp! You have lost the argument in this thread. You have.
Yakuda
Verified User
If only you dingbats had put up a better candidate you could have continued your destruction of America
Yakuda
Verified User
Oh well. Maybe if people came legally they wouldnt have to worry about this shit but as it is, play stupid games, win stupid prizes
There were no warrants in the raid of the 130 apartments at 7500 South Shore Drive on September 30th, 2025. Over half the people in the apartments were American citizens. The other half of the apartments were occupied by people with temporary visas. There was no evidence against any of them.
Trumppers do not care one inch about the Constitution or the limits on government. @Teflon Don
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Illegals and the owner gave LEOs permission to search. STFU bitch, you ain't no lawyer.
As a citizen that's had some experiences and done some studying, I'm more familiar with the 4th Amendment than you, boy.
I have both denied and given police consent to search before.
Have a kickass lawyer, too. And have had in the past.
Illegals gave permission, citation? The owner is not sufficient to give permission in this instance, dumbshit.
Your tiny self education led you to a terrible misunderstanding of reality, no wonder you are a Trumpper.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
You fucktard. What I'm saying gets played out daily in courtrooms across Florida.
You're a fucking idiot with your Google bullshit. It does not work like that.
I've had it explained to me by police and lawyers that actually do things.
A friend was involved in a case where the owner gave permission to search, and guess what? They went to jail.
Because that's how it really is, retard.
Another friend owned a house that the cops wanted to search and he said "No", so they couldn't without a search warrant, and they never got one and the tenants changed.
You are simply wrong, your friend either had a terrible lawyer or the police had a warrant.You fucktard. What I'm saying gets played out daily in courtrooms across Florida.
You're a fucking idiot with your Google bullshit. It does not work like that.
I've had it explained to me by police and lawyers that actually do things.
A friend was involved in a case where the owner gave permission to search, and guess what? They went to jail.
Because that's how it really is, retard.
Another friend owned a house that the cops wanted to search and he said "No", so they couldn't without a search warrant, and they never got one and the tenants changed.
You do not understand the law, the owner of a rented residence does not have the authority to authorize police to search the residence.
They might be authorized by a judge who grants a warrant, but being authorized by the landlord is not sufficent.
You are simply wrong.