Archaeology of the New Testament

Still demanding perfection? You are not God.
Nope.

Anyone that has young kids knows that they are going to get hurt. They're going to fall and hit their head, scrape their knees, etc. There's a difference between letting norms play out and, as a parent, throwing razor blades all over the floor in their play area, which what your God did in a number of way.
 
False dichotomy fallacy.

Science is not mathematics.
Science is completely atheistic. It does not care whether a god or gods exist or not.
Mathematics is completely atheistic. It does not care whether a god or gods exist or not.
Science is not religion. You cannot claim your religion is 'science'.

Mantra 40a.

Evasion. Answer the question put to you.
"Your speculation is not knowledge, Void. It is mere speculation.

You don't know how long humans have been around."

Which one of these statements is the question you want me to answer? :laugh:
 
Irrelevance fallacy. Answer the question put to you.
It's not irrelevant. It's part of what structures the conversation. Cypress has his claims/opinions/thoughts and my responses are largely based on those claims/opinions/thoughts.

I'm not going to engage in a conversation with Cypress based on the belief that he's an atheist.
 
Omniscience?
Yes, you are asserting omniscience, but you are not omniscient. Your assertion is dismissed.

One is that you have no intellectual curiosity and have never in your life learned about the history of mankind.
I presume you are talking about your asserted omniscience ... that you read on the internet and are regurgitating here.

By the way, you are referring to pre-history, yes? You really mean prehistoric humans, yes?

So, how do you pretend to know anything about prehistoric humans? Is it that you read it on the internet so it must be true?
 
Nope.

Anyone that has young kids knows that they are going to get hurt. They're going to fall and hit their head, scrape their knees, etc.
Okay so far...
There's a difference between letting norms play out and, as a parent, throwing razor blades all over the floor in their play area,
So you blame parents for every little thing that allows their kids to get hurt. You consider it 'throwing razor blades on the floor'.

Extreme argument fallacy.
which what your God did in a number of way.
Really??? I see no razor blades all over the floor, the street, or anywhere on Earth. Maybe in a razor blade factory it might happen, but they clean it up when it does.

God is not a forklift accident.
 
It's not irrelevant. It's part of what structures the conversation.
Irrelevance is not a conversation. It is irrelevance.
Cypress has his claims/opinions/thoughts
So?
and my responses are largely based on those claims/opinions/thoughts.
No. They are based on your fundamentalist religion.
I'm not going to engage in a conversation with Cypress based on the belief that he's an atheist.
He is not an atheist. I never claimed he was. He thinks he is a Christian, but he denies the Bible.

You are not an atheist. I never claimed you were. You are a fundamentalist religious fanatic.
 
The point is we don't exist on earth in a vacuum.
Yes, we exist on earth, which is in a vacuum. Are you telling me that you never knew this?

We are intimately connected to the cosmos and to the other planetary bodies.
Earth has no connection to anything.

What caused the laws of physics is a philosophical or theological question.
What caused your deity to exist is a philosophical or theological question. Do you have an answer?
 
Irrelevance is not a conversation. It is irrelevance.

So?

No. They are based on your fundamentalist religion.

He is not an atheist. I never claimed he was. He thinks he is a Christian, but he denies the Bible.

You are not an atheist. I never claimed you were. You are a fundamentalist religious fanatic.
Aaaaaaagain.... his opinion is that his god micro-designed the universe and that opinion is the basis of our discussion about the claimed flaws in that design.
 
Back
Top