Virtually the rest of the world.
Grok: There are not "about 100 countries" where an American could realistically relocate and access meaningfully
better welfare and public assistance as a newcomer.
While many countries (especially in Europe) have more generous
citizen-focused social safety nets than the US in areas like universal healthcare, unemployment benefits, or family support, accessing them as a non-citizen/immigrant involves major barriers.
- Spending comparisons: OECD data shows several European countries spend far more of GDP on public social expenditure (e.g., France/Italy ~30%+, Nordic countries 25%+, vs. US public spending lower but with substantial private spending). The US ranks lower in public social spending share but higher when including private benefits.
- Countries with stronger public systems often include comprehensive healthcare, paid parental leave, housing support, and unemployment aid. The US emphasizes work-based programs (e.g., Social Security, Medicare for elderly/disabled, targeted aid like SNAP/Medicaid) with more private elements.
However,
"better for an American moving there
" is different from "better for citizens."
Most generous welfare systems are restricted to citizens or long-term residents.
Only a small number of high-income countries have notably more expansive systems and pathways for Americans.
Americans need visas/residency (e.g., work, family, investment, or retirement visas). Many European countries require years of legal residency, contributions via taxes/work, or citizenship before full access. Undocumented or short-term stays offer little/none.
Generous benefits often come with high taxes and living costs.
Having said that,