That is a hyperbole. Dramatic. In this case there is no baby to be killed.
Of course there is. That is the nonsense that you marxists try to convince yourselves of to assuage your conscience. It is the same reasoning you use to justify euthanasia.
Look I have had this abortion debate what seems like a gazillion times on message boards and chat rooms (back in the day of AOL) for what seems like forever. I know that I am NEVER going to change your mind.
If you want to support it, go ahead. But at least have the intellectual honesty to call it what it is. It is the murder of an unborn life. Stop trying to gaslight me and twist yourself into knots saying it isn't a life and it isn't a baby. It is the most absurd argument in the world. While I still would never agree with you, I would probably respect the position more because it is coming from a place of honesty. But since it doesn't, then I don't.
Abortion is nothing more than a mode of convenience for men and women who want to have all of the fun of sex without the responsibility. That is it. Plain and simple. And don't give me the health of the mother, rape, incest etc. Those are more lame arguments to support your position. Less than 3% of abortions are because of those reasons.
I have asked marxists for years if we made abortion legal for just those reasons but banned it for "convenience" would they compromise and they ALWAYS say no, which again weakens their argument.
Personally, I would make it illegal in any circumstance. I would never jail the women, but I would jail the doctors who performed it. And here is where you wax poetic about back alley abortions with coat hangers which never happened in reality, but if they did, I would invest in coat hangers given the number of abortions that happen every year.
Here is the ultimate question you probably won't answer. If an abortion isn't performed, in nine months what do you get?
I will understand if you are too afraid to answer.
