"The Supreme Court on Monday declined a request by President Trump to review a $5 million civil judgment against him after a jury found in 2023 that he sexually abused and defamed the writer E. Jean Carroll."
- Supreme Court of the United States, NYT.com
That was another HUGE loss for the PP.And even more importantly (and a bit surprising), they upheld the right of states to count mail-in ballots received after the election. The MAGATs will soil themselves over this decision. But it benefits them as well, since military ballots fall under the ruling as well as civilian ballots. They tend to always vote (R).
Topless, I'm glad that you agree
True. Unfortunately, it was a 5-4 vote instead of being unanimous per the Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the Constitution.And even more importantly (and a bit surprising), they upheld the right of states to count mail-in ballots received after the election. The MAGATs will soil themselves over this decision. But it benefits them as well, since military ballots fall under the ruling as well as civilian ballots. They tend to always vote (R).
I'm happy you're glad.... that doesn't happen too often....Topless, I'm glad that you agree
It was $83,000,000.00"The Supreme Court on Monday declined a request by President Trump to review a $5 million civil judgment against him after a jury found in 2023 that he sexually abused and defamed the writer E. Jean Carroll."
- Supreme Court of the United States, NYT.com
No, that one is still on appeal.It was $83,000,000.00
It happens every single day when I wake up.I'm happy you're glad.... that doesn't happen too often....
Well that's good to know because you could have fooled me... Let's see you prove it 1 of these daysIt happens every single day when I wake up.
I feel no need to prove it to anyone. Thank you for your interest.Well that's good to know because you could have fooled me... Let's see you prove it 1 of these days
I understand perfectlyI feel no need to prove it to anyone. Thank you for your interest.
It’s more than OK you evil shit bag
We will correct that flaw when we take the peoples power backTrue. Unfortunately, it was a 5-4 vote instead of being unanimous per the Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the Constitution.
OTOH, it reveals who are the MAGA cocksuckers violating their oaths by shredding the Constitution: Gorsuch, Alito, Thomas, and Kavanaugh.
The 5-4 ruling saw Chief Justice John Roberts and conservative Amy Coney Barrett side with their liberal peers in concluding that nothing in federal law requires all ballots to be collected by Election Day....![]()
Supreme Court rules ballots arriving after Election Day can be counted, in win for Dems
The Supreme Court upheld a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted up to five days after Election Day so long as they are postmarked by voting day, handing Democrats a massive win he…nypost.com
...During oral arguments, GOP-appointed Justices Neil Gorsuch, Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Brett Kavanaugh appeared to lean towards overturning the state law, while the three Democratic justices leaned against. Chief Justice John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett did little to tip their hand.
You won’t be very happyI'm happy you're glad.... that doesn't happen too often....
Good luck Taking back the people's power...It’s more than OK you evil shit bag
You understand nothingI understand perfectly