Into the Night
Contributor
What does the Big Bang (if any!) have to do with Satan or this YHWH character?@Into the Night , since the Big Bang never happened, is it safe to say that Satan never entered YHWH's space at Satan's rebellion?
What does the Big Bang (if any!) have to do with Satan or this YHWH character?@Into the Night , since the Big Bang never happened, is it safe to say that Satan never entered YHWH's space at Satan's rebellion?
I looked it up,very vagueSomeone who follows the ways of the prophet Zarathustra and believes in the supreme god and creator Ahuramazda.
Jews are the Antithesis of White Nationalist
Satan's rebellion was the trigger of The Big BangWhat does the Big Bang (if any!) have to do with Satan or this YHWH character?
Big Bang happened, triggered by Satan's Rebellion@Into the Night , since the Big Bang never happened, is it safe to say that Satan never entered YHWH's space at Satan's rebellion?
You have to follow the sub-thread. @Melchizedek=Tecumseh explains that certain Christian doctrine caused the Big Bang. I'm just trying to figure out how to respond.What does the Big Bang (if any!) have to do with Satan or this YHWH character?
@Into the Night , since the Big Bang never happened, is it safe to say that Satan never entered YHWH's space at Satan's rebellion?
I'm telling you what happenedYou have to follow the sub-thread. @Melchizedek=Tecumseh explains that certain Christian doctrine caused the Big Bang. I'm just trying to figure out how to respond.
Science is not data.The acquisition and interpretation of data is the heart of science. It's the very foundation of the experimental method.
NO DATA, NO SCIENCE
Baptism is not a religion.Very true.
Even today though I think the Methodists, Catholics, Jews, and nondenominational evangelicals would get upset if Baptism was made the state religion and we had to pay taxes to support the Baptist state church.
Science is not data.So you join hands with @IBDaMann in believing science can be done without data![]()
Okay. It's a non-sequitur fallacy to make such a statement.You have to follow the sub-thread. @Melchizedek=Tecumseh explains that certain Christian doctrine caused the Big Bang. I'm just trying to figure out how to respond.
You don't know what happened.I'm telling you what happened
Science is not a 'method' or procedure.That's not the scientific method. That's only a piece of the scientific method.
Geophysicists at Chevron, Exxon, and Harvard acquire data, analyze it, make conclusions.
NO DATA, NO SCIENCE
Science is not data.Speculating and guessing without data isn't unique to science at all. Informed guesswork, hypothesizing, speculating is what every human on the planet does every day.
What sets the scientific method apart is it is testable and repeatable.
NO DATA, NO SCIENCE
The Theory of Creation is not a theory of science.I don't know enough about tax policy to have a firm opinion either way. I'd like to evaluate both sides of the argument. Churches use public infrastructure on the one hand. But on the other hand, are they providing charitable services to the community that would otherwise have to be provided by governments?
I certainly don't want anything unconstitutional, like school prayer, or creation science in the public schools.
Religion does not have to stay out of politics. Most every religion has its politics.On the other hand, I'm a little reticent to say religion must stay out of politics.
So?Martin Luther King invoked religious belief in his quest for civil rights.
Fine, but I will hold you to that statement.Quite effectively too. Democratic Texas Senatorial candidate James Talarico is openly stating that his religious values and the social gospel help inform his opinions on public policy. I'm okay with that.
Logic is not science.reason and logic are the beginning of science and those permeate every facet of life.
Science is not data."Science without data is philosophy,
AI slop.as the foundational scientific method requires empirical observation to test, verify, and validate hypotheses. Without rigorous data collection, decision-makers are left fumbling in the dark, leading to a lack of physical guardrails in real-world applications."
~AI summary
Science is not data.No Data, No Science
Science is not data.Reasoning without any empirical data is philosophy.
Humans have been doing that for thousands of years
Science is not philosophy."if you say "no thats' philosophy" you will be the biggest retard on earth."
yep. biggest retard on earth it is.
we all know that.
philosophy and science started as the same thing.
they're both science because reason is the basis of science.
Science is not an age. Science has no 'age'.We are in the 21st century. They're not the same thing anymore, and haven't been for hundreds of years.
Philosophy is deductive reasoning in the absence of empirical data
Science is based the the testability of empirical data, and the inductive interpretation of results.