Into the Night
Contributor
Mantra 1a. Lame.
Archaeology of the New Testament
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
Into the Night
Contributor
You can't blame your problem on me or anybody else, Void.
Which makes you a liar.
Did you forget the context again?
Into the Night
Contributor
You aren't having a discussion, NoName. Bulverism fallacy.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Gravity is what it is: a vector field of acceleration. Einstein changed the way we thought about gravity from a force that reaches out across space, to a distortion of spacetime.
I would never have to post independent corroborating sources if you would just learn to accept that what I write is generally accurate and correct.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
Into the Night
Contributor
Yup. You lost context completely again.
Into the Night
Contributor
Electricity is not a charged particle and does not result from them. Neither a proton nor an electron is electricity.
Electricity always has a current, and a voltage. It therefore has power, which can be expressed as joules, watts, or horsepower.
One joule is the power dissipated as heat of one ampere of current through one ohm for one second, which requires one volt.
The Universe is not a joule.
The Universe is not a watt.
The Universe is not electricity.
The Universe is not a proton.
The Universe is not an electron.
The Universe is not a charge.
The Universe is not a current.
The Universe is not a voltage.
The Universe is unorganized.
Into the Night
Contributor
Gravity is not acceleration.
Acceleration is not a field.
Einstein doesn't mention gravity at all.
Gravity is neither space nor time.
Science does not use consensus.
It is not. Assumption of victory fallacy.
The Universe is not Einstein.
The Universe is not gravity.
The Universe is not a field.
The Universe is not acceleration.
The Universe is not a curve.
The Universe is unorganized.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
Too funny! Like most leftists, you think an online dictionary is a physics textbook, and you think you know what science is.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
Nope, not according to General Relativity. Just explain here in this thread how, in your view, Einstein was mistaken.
You keep repeating this error. Einstein's model makes it clear that there is no gravity. Einstein's model does not somehow portray gravity differently; it simply eliminates it entirely.
One of these days, actually peruse the theory and notice how there simply is no gravity at all. Of course, if all you ever plan to do is to limit yourself to regurgitating the endless errors of AI apps, then just keep doing that.
General Relativity discusses the geometry of spacetime, and does not say that it is somehow gravity, or some different way of thinking of gravity. In fact, a body in freefall is a geodesic, defined as the free path absent all forces. There is no gravity; it is eliminated in Relativity.
You haven't gotten anything correct, that I haven't explained to you several times previously.
ZenMode
Well-known member
You couldn't find context with a magnifying class and a sherpa.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
they do say that electricity is a flow of electrons, a flow or a dithering back and forth, in the case of ac.
ac/dc. you shook me all night long.
that would be wild if water flows could be ac and be just as effective.
you could just keep drinking and barfing up the same mouth full of water your whole life and still be good.
Einstein's general relativity is literally expressed as field equations, because it describes how curved spacetime causes a field of acceleration.
You can't actually learn anything by frantically Googling for five minutes. You have to invest the time to take classes, read textbooks, attend lectures.That is precisely how general relativity changed the way we think about gravity. It is not an acceleration caused by some attractive force reaching out and acting at a distance. It's an acceleration caused by the curvature of spacetime.
Charged particles cause an electric field and electricity; that is what you would have learned in high school physics if you had bothered to take the class.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
Instead of pivoting, show me "gravity" in General Relativity that is somehow "treated differently". When you cannot find any gravity whatsoever in General Relativity, feel free to post your apology for giving me push-back when I was trying to help you ... yet again.
What is "it"? Are you saying that there is gravity in General Relativity and gravity ("it") is caused by the curvature of spacetime? ... or are you admitting that there simply is no gravity whatsoever in General Relativity?
Gravity is an acceleration of matter and energy moving along geodesics in curved spacetime, according to Einstein.
Isaac Newton thought it was an acceleration caused by some type of attractive force reaching out and acting over a distance.
Einstein's theory was a paradigm shift in how we think about this field of acceleration that every human, animal, planet, and asteroid 'feels'.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
if the matter is held in place there is no acceleration at involving gravity.
gravity is a force, it is not dependent on movement.
immovable object versus irresistible force.
like this thread.
"Gravity involves acceleration because it is a geometric curvature in spacetime that causes an object's velocity to change."
~AI overview
Planets and moons aren't being "held in place". Orbits are a motion of acceleration. Any kind of curved motion or change of direction (orbital elliptical motion, parabolic motion, circular motion) is a type of acceleration.