Not golfing until Monday.
Not heated in the slightest, RB. Just enjoying my light-hearted conversation with Grok.
He's a monon, ya know!
Democratic "Socialists" Reveal Soviet Style Platform, Further Dimming the Line Between Them and Communism
- Thread starter Grokmaster
- Start date
Not heated in the slightest, RB. Just enjoying my light-hearted conversation with Grok.
He's a monon, ya know!
Which is based directly on the electoral results of the individual states, stupidfuck.
Another clueless JPP leftidiot, trumpeting its ignorance.
Hey, Moron. Did you get the notion that I agreed to each comma and period in the DSA platform?
Oh, well...you are a moron, so I guess that is to be expected.
No, imbecile, I just see that you don't know WTF you are blathering about in regards to parliamentary governments.....and can't find a single inaccuracy in the Wash. Times posting of the DSA platform....
Yes, you are. And I am having a tremendous amount of fun provoking you.
Stay with me. I am not finished with you.
A parliamentary government has at least two authorities, although one is mostly ceremonial...usually a president or monarch.
Get with the program, Moron.
Most parliamentary states have less turmoil and chaos than presently infects the United States, Moron.
Get your ducks in a row.
The Burgemestrian parliamentary government. It has a parliament, and a frog as a sort of president/state photographer. And the frog is elected by the people.
C'mon, Moron. You can do better than that.
It is the kind of source a moron would choose. If it wrote that occasionally the sky is blue...it would be correct, but it still would be the kind of source only a moron would choose.
No stupidfuck; a moron would keep bitching about a source that accurately printed the m,aterial cited.
A moron...like you.
There are countless sources of the DSA platform....the one I used is irrelevant to the point; but, since you're a fucking idiot....you can't grasp the obvious point.
My comment was directed at your choice of a source. If many sources exist...and you chose that one, I must apologize for calling you a moron. Calling you a moron is an insult to the morons among us.No stupidfuck; a moron would keep bitching about a source that accurately printed the m,aterial cited.
A moron...like you.
There are countless sources of the DSA platform....the one I used is irrelevant to the point; but, since you're a fucking idiot....you can't grasp the obvious point.
You are doing great. Stick with me.
Librtlover
Verified User
Dummycrats are indeed communists and anti American to the core. Get to live with that fact.
That's what is making you grumpy!
Now you're a grumpy old white man, like me. Right?
Well that’s too easy.
I AM an old white man...and, like you, AM a bit grumpy from time to time.
All of us here on both sides of the RIGHT/LEFT divide should realize that as opposed as we are to the (totality) of the other side's position...the people on that side are every bit as opposed to ours in that same way. Some of us get that and, albeit often begrudgingly, acknowledge it iN some meaningful way. (Like we often do.) Others simply do not get it at all.
Grok seems not to get it in the slightest...and there are time when I react to his provocations in an over-the-top way. I like to think of it as "in a reflective way to his way."
I guess it is grumpy or heated.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
IMHO, it's a reaction to the Citizens United decision. Seriously doubt it can get much traction, as it would take an act of Congress to do so. And if party policy rings true for all, you won't see many DS. In the Senate. That being said, like you have variations of conservative republicans (neocon, tea party, maga), you're going to have variations of democrats (liberal, progressive, social democrat).
As for the Washington Times:
mediabiasfactcheck.com
As for the Washington Times:
Washington Times - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
mediabiasfactcheck.com
Please cite the inaccuracies in the Times listing of the DSA platform I posted. More irrelevant leftidiocy.IMHO, it's a reaction to the Citizens United decision. Seriously doubt it can get much traction, as it would take an act of Congress to do so. And if party policy rings true for all, you won't see many DS. In the Senate. That being said, like you have variations of conservative republicans (neocon, tea party, maga), you're going to have variations of democrats (liberal, progressive, social democrat).
As for the Washington Times:
Washington Times - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
As for your source:
Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is widely criticized by users and media observers for allegedly exhibiting a left-wing or liberal bias in its ratings. Critics point out that its founder and team often apply subjective methodologies, resulting in a disproportionate number of conservative outlets being rated as biased compared to their liberal counterparts. [1, 2]
Users in forum discussions on platforms like Reddit note that MBFC's assessments can sometimes downplay the biases of left-leaning outlets while harshly categorizing center-right and right-wing sources.
That Depends frankie. You need new glasses?
Very funny. I can be as funny as well.Well that’s too easy.
The conservatives' goal is Fascism, which is outlined here: https://www.cpac.org/
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
1. You IDIOT! The first Quora review that's linked in your posted review by a Felix Ling says it all.
2. Here's what the Washington Examiner left out:
A Top Mamdani Official Tried to Meet with Iran
Ana Maria Archila, Commissioner for International Affairs, almost took a meeting with the Islamic Republic’s ambassador to the U.N.
www.city-journal.org
3. Where is the link for the review you posted here?
4. My initial post is critical of Mamdani's appointment here. If you didn't hsve your head up that Orange ass, you'd would have discerned that.
Only in your illusionary reality
Interesting. Let's ask Bernie.
I know you like to play games and troll but I'm interested in how far we take this.