Archaeology of the New Testament

[Into the Night]

Frantically Googling again?
Mass is lost in radioactive decay, Mr. Copy and Paste.

No mass is lost in radioactive decay. Mass is conserved.

The daughter products of a radioactive decay chain have less combined mass than the mass of the original atomic nuclei.

The mass in end material is equal to the mass of the starting material.

Where did the mass go? It was converted to energy, specifically gamma radiation and kinetic energy

It didn't go anywhere. It is not possible to destroy mass into nothing.
Mass is not energy.
Mass cannot be converted to energy.
Gamma radiation is photons, which have no mass (other than apparent mass, IAW Einstein's special theory of relativity, which you deny).

In pocket billiards, if you break rack of object balls with a strong shot from the cue ball, it does not destroy the mass of a single ball.

You cannot create mass out of nothing.
You cannot destroy mass into nothing.
You cannot create energy out of nothing.
You cannot destroy energy into nothing.
You cannot convert mass to energy.
You cannot convert energy to mass.

 

[Into the Night]

You can disagree, but that doesn't change the fact that you don't know what your next thought is going to be until you think it and you can prevent that next thought from arising.

There's no self that is creating thoughts. There's no self that is sitting outside of your stream of consciousness.

There's only the stream of consciousness.

Denial of self fallacy.

 

[ZenMode]

Denial of self fallacy.

As usual, you can't actually defend your position, you just resort to useless phrases.

 

[ZenMode]

Attempted proof by negation.
Courtier's fallacy.

Got nothing but useless phrases...

 

[Into the Night]

As usual, you can't actually defend your position, you just resort to useless phrases.

Denial of logic.

 

[Into the Night]

Got nothing but useless phrases...

Denial of logic. Bulverism fallacy.

 

[IBDaMann]

It obviously makes you angry and embarrassed that what I wrote about matter and energy is supported and corroborated by the premier European nuclear physics lab CERN, and the U.S. national physics lab at Brookhaven.

You haven't provided any support for your absurd assertions; you have only pretended to speak for organizations for whom you do not speak.

You are clearly intent on deluding yourself. Are you succeeding?

 

[IBDaMann]

Mass is lost in radioactive decay,

Nice pivot. Dial it back. No matter is created out of other energy as you insist.

On the other hand, if your intention is to pull a full 180-degree U-turn and agree with me, then that's all you really should write.

 

[Cypress]

No mass is lost in radioactive decay. Mass is conserved!

Some mass is lost in radioactive decay series and converted to energy. Conservation of mass-energy is the operating principle in nuclear reactions.

You cannot convert mass to energy!
You cannot convert energy to mass!

 

[Cypress]

You haven't provided any support for your absurd assertions!

I gave you links to Europe's premier nuclear physics research Institute and to the United States National physics lab at Brookhaven corroborating that matter and energy are interchangeable, and that light quanta can be converted to matter and anti-matter.

 

[Cypress]

No, it isn't. Nuclear fission was known before that!

Not possible to have known about nuclear fission before 1905, when the special theory of relativity was published. We didn't even really understand the atomic nucleus then. The neutron wasn't discovered until the early 1930s, and the first experimental demonstrations of nuclear fission weren't until the late 1930s.

Matter is not energy!
Matter is not energy. Nothing in E=mc^2 says it is!

"Matter is a concentrated form of energy, and the two are interchangeable, according to Einstein’s famous equation E=mc2"​

~ Center for European Nuclear Research (CERN)​

 

[Melchizedek=Tecumseh]

Not possible to have known about nuclear fission before 1905, when the special theory of relativity was published. We didn't even really understand the atomic nucleus then. The neutron wasn't discovered until the early 1930s, and the first experimental demonstrations of nuclear fission weren't until the late 1930s.

"Matter is a concentrated form of energy, and the two are interchangeable, according to Einstein’s famous equation E=mc2"​

~ Center for European Nuclear Research (CERN)​

What happened the second before matter was created,and what caused it!?

 

[Cypress]

What happened the second before matter was created,and what caused it!?

The $64,000 question.

 

[Melchizedek=Tecumseh]

The $64,000 question.

Satan entered YHWH's space! Make that $64000 check payable to Melchizedek!

 

[ZenMode]

The $64,000 question.

Is it though? Isn't that where your deity wiggles his nose or something?

 

[Into the Night]

Some mass is lost in radioactive decay series and converted to energy. Conservation of mass-energy is the operating principle in nuclear reactions.

Repetition fallacy.

You cannot convert mass to energy.
You cannot convert energy to mass.

 

[Into the Night]

I gave you links to Europe's premier nuclear physics research Institute and to the United States National physics lab at Brookhaven corroborating that matter and energy are interchangeable, and that light quanta can be converted to matter and anti-matter.

Science is not a government agency, Cyborg.
Energy cannot be converted into a mass.

Courtier's fallacy.
False authority fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Not possible to have known about nuclear fission before 1905, when the special theory of relativity was published. We didn't even really understand the atomic nucleus then. The neutron wasn't discovered until the early 1930s, and the first experimental demonstrations of nuclear fission weren't until the late 1930s.

"Matter is a concentrated form of energy, and the two are interchangeable, according to Einstein’s famous equation E=mc2"​

~ Center for European Nuclear Research (CERN)​

The electron was discovered in 1897 by JJ Thompson. Ionising radiation was discovered by Wilhelm Rontgen in 1895. Uranium was isolated in 1789. In 1896 Henri Becquerel discovered beta radiation.
Science is not a government agency.

Matter is not energy.
Energy is not matter.
E=mc^2 is not the special theory of relativity.
You don't understand the atomic nucleus even now, or even what 'fission' is.

Fission does not create energy out of matter.
Fission does not create energy out of nothing.
Fission does not destroy matter into nothing.
Fission does not convert matter into energy.

I have already explained the Theory of Special Relativity and the Theory of Relativity to you. Go back and read them again.
Your mindless chanting does not change or destroy any theory of science.
You are simply ignoring science.

CERN is not science.
A government agency is not science.

Courtier's fallacy.
False authority fallacy.
Repetition fallacy (chanting).

 

[Into the Night]

The $64,000 question.

Cliche fallacy.

 

[Cypress]

The electron was discovered in 1897 by JJ Thompson! Ionising radiation was discovered by Wilhelm Rontgen in 1895! Uranium was isolated in 1789! In 1896 Henri Becquerel discovered beta radiation!

I'm not interested in how frantically you can Google for tidbits of information. This is irrelevant and extraneous information to my post you are responding to. Nuclear fission was not understood until the 20th century.

E=mc^2 is not the special theory of relativity!

E=mc^2 was a direct consequence of Einstein's special theory of relativity.