The most secure election ever and other lies.

The reason your dishonesty is immediately dismissed is that you aren't addressing any of the eyewitness testimony.
Except that every single times I've address it, I've said the same thing about it, which is that what people think they see doesn't mean it's what they actually. So, care to stop lying?
You pivot to allusions of fictional testimony that was never given of fictional events that never happened.
I pivot to what I said above, which is well established. People, in the article I referenced earlier, thought they saw a guy wheeling a wagon of ballots into TCF center. What they actually saw was a camerman with his equipment.

But, I'm 100% certain that you will stick to playing dumb and not acknowledging what is known... what people think they saw doesn't mean it's what they actually saw.

Rudy Giuliani, liar that he is, edited a video to make it look like election workers in Georgia were pulling suitcases of Biden ballots from under tables. What he actually saw was people doing their job, which includes storing ballots in bins and removing them to count them.
 
Except that every single times I've address it, I've said the same thing about it, which is that what people think they see doesn't mean it's what they actually. So, care to stop lying?

I pivot to what I said above, which is well established. People, in the article I referenced earlier, thought they saw a guy wheeling a wagon of ballots into TCF center. What they actually saw was a camerman with his equipment.

But, I'm 100% certain that you will stick to playing dumb and not acknowledging what is known... what people think they saw doesn't mean it's what they actually saw.

Rudy Giuliani, liar that he is, edited a video to make it look like election workers in Georgia were pulling suitcases of Biden ballots from under tables. What he actually saw was people doing their job, which includes storing ballots in bins and removing them to count them.
Magats used to stand by this lie as true...


Rudy Giuliani concedes he made false statements about two Fulton election workers mishandling ballots



Moss-Freeman-Jan-6-1536x1024.jpg
 
From now on, the ONLY beliefs you are permitted to express are those that you've experienced first hand. Deal?
Why did you just shift from "claims" to "beliefs"? You are supposed to be supporting your claim. Your beliefs are irrelevant. They were irrelevant when you were pushing your Global Warming religion and they are irrelevant when you are pushing your Democrat OBEDIENCE.

Dial it back. Support your assertions.
 
Except that every single times I've address it, I've said the same thing about it,
Yes, you are a broken record. You ignore eyewitness testimony in deference to DNC propaganda. Climate Change anyone?

I pivot to what I said above,
A broken record will skip forever.

People, in the article I referenced earlier, thought they saw a guy wheeling a wagon of ballots into TCF center.
You are referencing an article. You aren't poring over eyewitness testimony. You regurgitate your echo chamber on faith alone. You claim omniscience to dismiss eyewitnesses whose testimony you haven't even heard/read.

You are simply dishonest, which hasn't changed from your Global Warming arguments.

Rudy Giuliani, liar that he is,
You're the liar in this situation. You have no credibility. You calling Giuliani a liar gives him more cred.
 
Yes, you are a broken record. You ignore eyewitness testimony in deference to DNC propaganda. Climate Change anyone?
Nope. I acknowledge for what it is. What someone THINKS they saw. That's it. Some people think they see Jesus in their toast or ghosts in their house. Should I take that seriously, too?
A broken record will skip forever.


You are referencing an article. You aren't poring over eyewitness testimony. You regurgitate your echo chamber on faith alone. You claim omniscience to dismiss eyewitnesses whose testimony you haven't even heard/read.

You are simply dishonest, which hasn't changed from your Global Warming arguments.


You're the liar in this situation. You have no credibility. You calling Giuliani a liar gives him more cred.
Eye witness testimony = What someone THINKS they saw. That's it.

It's also all you have to defend what you want to believe.
 
Last edited:
Why did you just shift from "claims" to "beliefs"? You are supposed to be supporting your claim. Your beliefs are irrelevant. They were irrelevant when you were pushing your Global Warming religion and they are irrelevant when you are pushing your Democrat OBEDIENCE.

Dial it back. Support your assertions.
lol... you are flailing again.

You are hanging your hat on a 50/50, at best, proposition and you are flailing... trying to change the subject.

Not gonna happen.
 
Revealed it after the Trump DOJ zeroed in on her..
The issue was fixed in 2024. If you had an ounce of intellectual curiosity you would know that.

Trump's DOJ didn't start requesting voter rolls until May of 2025. Again, if you had an ounce of intellectual curiosity...
ROFL

Sounds like they got caught.
Caught by who? It was found out in 2024 and fixed in 2024. The governor hid it for 2 years.
 
Last edited:
The issue was fixed in 2024. If you had an ounce of intellectual curiosity you would know that.
It was not fixed, Void.
Trump's DOJ didn't start requesting voter rolls until May of 2025. Again, if you had an ounce of intellectual curiosity...
Pivot fallacy.
States that do not comply can no longer use the US postal service to deliver or collect ballots.

They can either lose he ability to conduct elections by mass mail-in voting, or comply.
Caught by who? It was found out in 2024 and fixed in 2024. The governor hid it for 2 years.
It was not fixed, Void.
 
I acknowledge for what it is.
Nope. You fabricate testimony that was never given regarding events that never happened. You invent hearsay testimony about people who drew erroneous conclusions.

Sworn affidavits follow the same rules as a cross examination in court and can only testify to what was directly observed, not to hearsay, not to conclusions that were drawn, ... and you would know this if you had read a few actual affidavits instead of reading articles from your thought-masters.

You have never acknowledged eyewitness testimony for what it is.

What someone THINKS they saw.
Nope.
 
Back
Top