The most secure election ever and other lies.

Nope. You fabricate testimony that was never given regarding events that never happened. You invent hearsay testimony about people who drew erroneous conclusions.

Sworn affidavits follow the same rules as a cross examination in court and can only testify to what was directly observed, not to hearsay, not to conclusions that were drawn, ... and you would know this if you had read a few actual affidavits instead of reading articles from your thought-masters.

You have never acknowledged eyewitness testimony for what it is.


Nope.
Sworn affidavits are documents showing what people think they saw. People thought they saw a guy wheeling ballots into the TCF Center. Melissa Carone thought she saw... God knows what because she's a fucking lunatic, but she apparently thought she saw something.

Neither of the two instances above where people seeing what they thought they saw.

We can go round and round for as long as you like, but the fact remains that sworn affidavits are only what people think they saw.
 
Nope. I gave you the logical requirements, which is like giving a cave man instructions on how to perform a firmware update on a tricorder.
No matter how you slice it, sworn affidavits are only what people think they saw.

"People" thought they saw secret suitcases of Biden ballots. It was investigated and it turned out to be normal storage bins for ballots and legal ballots.

Again, you are hanging your hat on 50/50 situations because it's all you have.

One of your favorite sworn affidavits is that of Jesse Richard Morgan.

Did you ever follow up to see how that turned out? I assume not.

The Investigation and Findings
    • Official Findings: A joint federal investigation by the USPS Office of Inspector General (OIG), the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and the FBI reviewed transportation logs and interviewed more than 20 witnesses. [1]
    • Contradictions: Investigators found that Morgan used roughly six different trailers during October 2020 and did not use the specific serial-numbered trailer he claimed had gone missing on the date in question. [1]
    • Data Limits: Transport databases showed his actual cargo contained a standard, much smaller quantity of regular mail items rather than the massive volume of phantom ballots alleged.
 
Last edited:
The issue was fixed in 2024.

Uh no - it was covered up and denied.

If you had an ounce of intellectual curiosity you would know that.

Trump's DOJ didn't start requesting voter rolls until May of 2025.

And this was not revealed until 2026 - If you had an ounce of intellectual curiosity you would know that.

Again, if you had an ounce of intellectual curiosity...

Caught by who? It was found out in 2024 and fixed in 2024. The governor hid it for 2 years.

That's a lie - it was covered up in 2024 and only revealed this year.

If you had an ounce of intellectual curiosity you would know that.
 
Sworn affidavits are documents showing what people think they saw. People thought they saw a guy wheeling ballots into the TCF Center. Melissa Carone thought she saw... God knows what because she's a fucking lunatic, but she apparently thought she saw something.

Thought they saw... But the Hive told you what you saw. Your eyes lie to you, the Hive is the only truth.

Does the programming still work? What do you see here?

 
Uh no - it was covered up and denied.
But still fixed in 2024. Did you know that "fixed" and "revealed" mean different things in the English language?
And this was not revealed until 2026 - If you had an ounce of intellectual curiosity you would know that.
That's literally what I said in the post you responded to.

"It was found out in 2024 and fixed in 2024. The governor hid it for 2 years."

Are you really dumb or really dishonest? I'm fine with either. I just want to know what I'm dealing with.
 
But still fixed in 2024. Did you know that "fixed" and "revealed" mean different things in the English language?

That's literally what I said in the post you responded to.

"It was found out in 2024 and fixed in 2024. The governor hid it for 2 years."

Are you really dumb or really dishonest? I'm fine with either. I just want to know what I'm dealing with.

There is no evidence it was "fixed."

The first step in "fixing" an issue is acknowledging it exists - which your party refused to do.
 
What's wrong with what's happening in that video?

So the programming holds.

You "see" what the Hive programs you to see.

Nothing wrong with hundreds of ballots literally stuffed in the ballot drop box - because we all know they are in service of the party.

Just incredible the depth of brainwashing with you drones.
 
There is no evidence it was "fixed."
What evidence would you personally expect to see?
The first step in "fixing" an issue is acknowledging it exists - which your party refused to do.
First, I'm not a Democrat. I'm not registered as D or R.

Second, yes, it should have been revealed sooner but it was also the new governor, a DEMOCRAT, who revealed it AND criticized the previous governor for hiding it.

No, actually the first step in fixing is, by definition, the actual fixing.

giphy.gif
 
So the programming holds.

You "see" what the Hive programs you to see.

Nothing wrong with hundreds of ballots literally stuffed in the ballot drop box - because we all know they are in service of the party.

Just incredible the depth of brainwashing with you drones.
There weren't hundreds. There may have been half a dozen.

You realize that Georgia, under REPUBLICAN Brad Raffensperger, investigated every accusation of ballot harvesting and found nothing, right?
 
There weren't hundreds. There may have been half a dozen.

You realize that Georgia, under REPUBLICAN Brad Raffensperger, investigated every accusation of ballot harvesting and found nothing, right?
Even if what you claimed were true, which we can all see it isn't - you are fine with open election fraud because it's only a few dozen?

So how may fraudulent ballots are okay? Just enough to ensure the party candidate wins?
 
Sworn affidavits are documents showing what people think they saw.
Testimony. You lie when you declare sworn affidavits to be conclusory.

People thought they saw a guy wheeling ballots into the TCF Center.
Nope. You just did it again.

Neither of the two instances above where people seeing what they thought they saw.
Neither of your two fabricated fictions were sworn affidavits.

We can go round and round for as long as you like,
Broken records skip forever.
 
No matter how you slice it, sworn affidavits are only what people think they saw.
No matter how you slice it, you are refusing to even consider mountainous incontrovertible sworn eyewitness testimony that goes against your dishonest political narrative.

You push Global Warming for crying out loud.
 
You're a slave. The DNC won't allow you to be a member. You probably pissed off someone higher up at the mail clerk level.


Why do you think that somehow matters? You OBEY the DNC; that's all that matters. You're overdue for a Climate sermon.
You intentionally passed over your favorite ghost story - James Morgan (or what this name was) and the mystery of the vanishing trailer/ballots.

That was sworn affidavit. That was investigated by multiple federal agencies, including the FBI, and nothing was found.

The reason you ignored it is because, once you acknowledge it, and the investigation, you have to either a) admit that it was all a tall tail and he didn't see what he claimed to see or b) start painting an eleborate conspiracy theory about the government's investigation.

It quit too if I were you.
 
You intentionally passed over your favorite ghost story - James Morgan (or what this name was) and the mystery of the vanishing trailer/ballots.
If I recall correctly, this is your loony fabrication that incorporated a few details that I gave you from an actual affidavit. You still couldn't get it right, and you refused to read the actual affidavit even though I posted it for you. You won't read any affidavits because presumably their counter-narrative nature causes their text to burn your eyes.

The reason you ignored it is because, once you acknowledge it, and the investigation, ...
There was no FBI investigation into the actual events for which the affidavit provided testimony.
It quit too if I were you.
 
If I recall correctly, this is your loony fabrication that incorporated a few details that I gave you from an actual affidavit. You still couldn't get it right, and you refused to read the actual affidavit even though I posted it for you. You won't read any affidavits because presumably their counter-narrative nature causes their text to burn your eyes.
I read it completely once and parts multiple times. I also watch a YouTube video of an interview with him where he tells the story, again.
There was no FBI investigation into the actual events for which the affidavit provided testimony.
It quit too if I were you.
The Investigation and Findings
    • Official Findings: A joint federal investigation by the USPS Office of Inspector General (OIG), the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and the FBI reviewed transportation logs and interviewed more than 20 witnesses. [1]
    • Contradictions: Investigators found that Morgan used roughly six different trailers during October 2020 and did not use the specific serial-numbered trailer he claimed had gone missing on the date in question. [1]
    • Data Limits: Transport databases showed his actual cargo contained a standard, much smaller quantity of regular mail items rather than the massive volume of phantom ballots alleged.

tenor.gif
 
Last edited:
Sworn affidavits are documents showing what people think they saw. People thought they saw a guy wheeling ballots into the TCF Center. Melissa Carone thought she saw... God knows what because she's a fucking lunatic, but she apparently thought she saw something.

Neither of the two instances above where people seeing what they thought they saw.

We can go round and round for as long as you like, but the fact remains that sworn affidavits are only what people think they saw.
Trivial fallacy.
You cannot make any evidence just disappear, Void.
 
Back
Top