Nope. You fabricate testimony that was never given regarding events that never happened. You invent hearsay testimony about people who drew erroneous conclusions.
Sworn affidavits follow the same rules as a cross examination in court and can only testify to what was directly observed, not to hearsay, not to conclusions that were drawn, ... and you would know this if you had read a few actual affidavits instead of reading articles from your thought-masters.
You have never acknowledged eyewitness testimony for what it is.
Nope.