Never forget
- Thread starter Diogenes
- Start date
Exactly. democrats just adored them even more.
Führer Fauci and his fervent fans wanted to stick it to kids.
HEY KID, MY PFIZER STOCK IS SOARING, NOW HOLD STILL
Führer Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and chief medical adviser to the usurper, said that children under the age of 5 may be able to get vaccinated against the Wu Flu by spring.
Führer Fauci said that it's “likely” in 2022, the juju juice jabs will be recommended to all children, down to six months of age.
"Hopefully within a reasonably short period of time, likely the beginning of next year in 2022, in the first quarter of 2022, it will be available to them," Führer Fauci ranted.
Führer Fauci said that children should get vaccinated as soon as they are able. “It’s important to vaccinate children. You want to make sure that we don’t have a situation where the children, inadvertently and innocently, when they get infected, many of them without any symptoms, are spreading it within the family unit. Which is something that recent studies indicated that might be the case.”
Führer Fauci "forgot" to mention that the highly profitable juju juice jabs do not prevent transmission of the Chinese disease his agency helped fund with taxpayer dollars at the Wuhan lab where gain-of-function research was carried out.
Fauci: Babies and Toddlers Should Have COVID-19 Vaccines Available by Spring 2022
Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
townhall.com
View: https://x.com/MehdiHasanShow/status/1461497131257274371?s=20
Emails showed that NIH officials allowed EcoHealth Alliance to craft oversight language governing its own gain-of-function research.
NIH officials have previously stated unequivocally that the agency did not fund any gain-of-function research in Wuhan. “The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” said Anthony Fauci, the head of the NIAID, during a Senate hearing in May.
But the correspondence with Daszak makes clear that at least some at the agency were concerned that EcoHealth Alliance’s proposed experiments met the criteria for gain-of-function research of concern as early as 2016.
According to Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University who has criticized the lack of federal oversight of gain-of-function research, the fact that the NIH allowed EcoHealth Alliance to write its own rules is further evidence of the NIH’s regulatory failure. “This is like the teacher giving you the opportunity to write your own homework problem and grade your own homework when you turn it in. Then you decide the teacher is so lenient, there’s no need to hand it in,” said Ebright. “The oversight process clearly failed.”
Beyond the question of oversight, others question whether these experiments should be conducted at all.
“In addition to the legalistic questions of whether EcoHealth and NIH were adhering to current guidelines,” said Bloom, “we urgently need a broader discussion about whether it’s a good idea to be making novel chimeras of coronaviruses that are at this point universally acknowledged to pose a pandemic risk to humans.”
theintercept.com
Emails showed that NIH officials allowed EcoHealth Alliance to craft oversight language governing its own gain-of-function research.
NIH officials have previously stated unequivocally that the agency did not fund any gain-of-function research in Wuhan. “The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” said Anthony Fauci, the head of the NIAID, during a Senate hearing in May.
But the correspondence with Daszak makes clear that at least some at the agency were concerned that EcoHealth Alliance’s proposed experiments met the criteria for gain-of-function research of concern as early as 2016.
According to Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University who has criticized the lack of federal oversight of gain-of-function research, the fact that the NIH allowed EcoHealth Alliance to write its own rules is further evidence of the NIH’s regulatory failure. “This is like the teacher giving you the opportunity to write your own homework problem and grade your own homework when you turn it in. Then you decide the teacher is so lenient, there’s no need to hand it in,” said Ebright. “The oversight process clearly failed.”
Beyond the question of oversight, others question whether these experiments should be conducted at all.
“In addition to the legalistic questions of whether EcoHealth and NIH were adhering to current guidelines,” said Bloom, “we urgently need a broader discussion about whether it’s a good idea to be making novel chimeras of coronaviruses that are at this point universally acknowledged to pose a pandemic risk to humans.”
NIH Officials Worked With EcoHealth Alliance to Evade Restrictions on Coronavirus Experiments
Emails show that NIH officials allowed EcoHealth Alliance to craft oversight language governing its own gain-of-function research.
theintercept.com