$10 million for WNBA champs to play a boy's high school team

[Poor Richard Saunders]

I knew you were an idiot, but you really didn't have to go and prove it.


Actually, no.

High school basketball: Best team in all 50 states entering the 2025-26 season

MaxPreps News - Preseason top 10 programs Archbishop Stepinac, Columbus, Millennium, Petersburg, Sierra Canyon and Wheeler represent their state.

www.maxpreps.com

There is ample evidence that the women would be overwhelmed in a game with a top boy's basketball team. As I stated, many of those male players are going on to college to play for major universities and will likely end up in the Final Four of college basketball. Some will end up in the NBA.

There is a reason that not many 18 or 19 year olds play in the NBA. Your argument is like saying a group of ten year olds will play well because some of them will be playing for the NBA some day. Future skills don't equal current skills.

For the money involved, the WNBA shouldn't turn it down. I know the high school team wouldn't.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Is that so?

Did you ask Grok to support your misogyny?

 

[Diogenes]

Did you ask Grok to support your misogyny?

No, I asked Grok for relevant facts.


Has a boy's youth sports team ever defeated a professional women's sports team (that wasn't packed with trannies)?

---

Yes.

Multiple documented cases exist, primarily in soccer (the most common setting for these training/scrimmage matches). These involve biological male youth teams (typically U-14 to U-16 academy or club sides) defeating senior professional or national women’s teams.

No evidence indicates the women’s sides were “packed with” transgender athletes; the results reflect ordinary biological sex differences in strength, speed, power, and physicality that emerge strongly around puberty.


Key examples:

• US Women’s National Team (USWNT) vs. FC Dallas U-15 boys academy (2017): The then-world-class USWNT lost 5-2 in a closed-door scrimmage while preparing for friendlies. Carli Lloyd later confirmed the result and noted the boys were “bigger, stronger and faster.” The USWNT has also lost to other elite youth academy sides (e.g., a Bayern Munich youth team).
• Switzerland Women’s National Team vs. FC Luzern U-15 boys (June 2025): Ahead of Euro 2025, Switzerland (then ranked around 23rd) lost 7-1 in a behind-closed-doors friendly. The result leaked via social media after the federation tried to keep it quiet. They also had mixed results against other local U-15 sides in the same prep period.
• Athletic Bilbao women’s team (professional, multiple Spanish titles) vs. their own Cadet A academy boys (including 14- to 16-year-olds): Lost 6-0 in a friendly.
• Australia Matildas (national team) vs. Newcastle Jets U-15 boys (2016): Lost 7-0. Brazil’s women’s national team also lost 3-1 to a Queensland state U-15 boys side in a 2023 World Cup warm-up.
• Other reported cases include Arsenal Women losing 5-0 to their own U-15 boys, various national teams (Sweden, Germany historically) losing to male youth sides, and a University of Washington women’s college team losing to a U-14 boys side.

These are almost always informal training or closed-door friendlies rather than official competitive matches. Women’s teams deliberately schedule elite male youth sides (roughly the physical level of mid-to-late puberty boys with high skill) because senior men’s teams are too dominant and same-sex women’s opponents do not provide the same speed/physical intensity. Large margins are common and consistent with known average sex differences in athletic performance post-puberty.


Comparable full games against WNBA or other professional women’s basketball teams are far rarer (none widely documented as official results), though challenges and expert consensus point the same direction for strong high-school boys teams.


The pattern holds across sports where strength, speed, and power matter.

Documented Youth Boys Teams Defeat Women's Sides | Shared Grok Conversation

Has a boy's youth sports team ever defeated a professional women's sports team (that wasn't packed w

grok.com

 

[Diogenes]

There is a reason that not many 18 or 19 year olds play in the NBA. Your argument is like saying a group of ten year olds will play well because some of them will be playing for the NBA some day. Future skills don't equal current skills.

What are the statistical chances of a a basketball game being won by the all-male team in these circumstances - the Las Vegas Aces WNBA champion team vs a boy's high school state title holding basketball team chosen by Clay Travis?

---

Very high for a strong state-championship-caliber boys high school team selected by Clay Travis—likely in the 80–95%+ range (or higher) that the boys win, based on available evidence, physical metrics, player statements, and consensus views. No official full games between a WNBA team and a high school boys team have been played, so this is an estimate grounded in athleticism gaps, expert/player comments, and related comparisons rather than direct head-to-head results.

Context of the Challenge​

Clay Travis (OutKick) has repeatedly claimed a good state-championship boys high school team would “smoke” the best WNBA team. He made a $1 million challenge in 2023 after the Aces’ titles and raised it to $10 million in early August 2026 for a game against a state-title boys team of his choosing (pay-per-view, with proceeds to Tunnel to Towers if structured that way). High school teams have reportedly reached out; the Aces/WNBA have not accepted or publicly engaged in detail.

Why the Odds Favor the Boys Team Heavily​

Post-puberty male advantages in size, strength, speed, explosiveness, and vertical leap are large and well-documented. These matter enormously in basketball (rim height is the same, contact/finishing, rebounding, defense).

• Height and size: Average WNBA player height is roughly 6'0"–6'1" (centers around 6'4"–6'5"; A’ja Wilson is listed at 6'4"). Elite state-championship or national-caliber high school boys teams commonly feature multiple players 6'5"+ to 6'8"+/7'0" with corresponding length and mass. Top prep/academy or strong public state champs are loaded with future D1 talent.
• Athleticism: Elite high school boys have superior speed, vertical (high-school elite males often 28–32"+; female pro norms are substantially lower), strength for finishing through contact, and explosiveness. NBA players (Michael Porter Jr., Lonzo Ball) have stated that strong 8th/9th-grade versions of themselves or top high-school groups would dominate WNBA competition. Other commentary and prior Grok-style simulations of elite HS vs. WNBA/All-Star groups produce consistent boys wins, often by large margins (e.g., average scores in the 100+ to 60s range in modeled high-school matchups).
• Skill vs. physicality: WNBA players (especially champions like the Aces with Wilson, Chelsea Gray, etc.) have superior experience, skill, IQ, shooting consistency, and team chemistry. That closes some of the gap and could keep a game from being a pure blowout against a merely average state champ. Against a top one (Travis gets to choose—think powerhouse programs with multiple high-level recruits), physical edges usually overwhelm skill differences in a full-court game.
• Talent pipeline perspective: Making the WNBA is extremely selective relative to the female high-school pool. The male high-school-to-pro path is also brutal, but the absolute physical ceiling for top teenage males sits well above elite adult females in the metrics that decide basketball outcomes.

Scrimmages and informal accounts (e.g., NBA players working with WNBA or college women) consistently note the physical difference. Patrick Beverley has praised WNBA physicality and skill in limited settings, but the broader consensus from athletes who have crossed over or observed both sides aligns with a clear male high-school advantage at the elite end.

Caveats and Range​

• Not 100%: Variance exists. A weaker or less athletic state champ, poor shooting night, foul trouble, or exceptional Aces execution could produce an upset or close game. Experience and spacing help the pros. If the boys team is not truly elite (Travis has incentive to pick a strong one), margins shrink.
• Junior-high vs. high-school: Gaps are already meaningful by late middle school for top prospects and become decisive in high school.
• No direct data: Everything is inferred. Simulations and expert opinion (including prior modeling) point to boys wins as the strong expectation, often decisively.

In short, for a Clay Travis-selected state-title boys team versus the Aces, the statistical/practical chance the all-male team wins is high—most informed estimates put it well above 50/50 and typically in the clear majority or heavy favorite range. The physical realities of sex differences in sport after puberty drive that assessment more than any single narrative.

https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNQ_f836801a-507e-4c75-806b-af5188601780

 

[QP!]

Except that is likely not the case. HS boys are not as disciplined in their team game as professional players. They are not as experienced. A pro women's basketball team will have played often against male players since that is how they practice. The boys may physically outmatch the women but they won't be able to mentally keep up or play 12 players of high caliber. This would be like claiming there is no way USA men's pro basketball players would ever lose to a national team from another country. We all know how that has turned out in previous years in the Olympics. A good team playing team ball can beat stronger individuals.

if it is a random boys high school team i would agree but a TOP boys high school team (state champ contender) will have players who are going on to full scholarship in university. They will very much be cohesive.

While anything is possible history just does not bode well for women against fully developed young men (age 18+/-) at the beginnings of their physical prime, imo.

FC Dallas under-15 boys squad beat the U.S. Women's National Team in a scrimmage​

Australian women's national team lose 7-0 to team of 15-year-old boys​

Olympian 'frustrated' by coverage of Swiss women's team's loss to U15s boys​

Warroad High School hockey team edges Team USA women​

Granted there are also some stories of the top womens teams winning and also as is pointed out in some articles these games are rarely played in a 'must win' fashion by the Olympians as opposed to testing game plays and rotating people and matchups. So i am open to the idea a top womens team playing their top 'must win' game might beat a top boys team some/most times. .

​

 

[Diogenes]

This is a legitimate point.

The challenge is Las Vegas Aces WNBA champion team vs a boy's high school state title holding basketball team chosen by Clay Travis.

If you want to see the WNBA All Stars in action, take a look at around the 2:28–3:30 mark (roughly 2 minutes 28 seconds to about 3 minutes 30 seconds into the video).


In Matt Walsh’s episode “Sophie Cunningham Just Exposed The WNBA For The Sick Organization It Is” (Ep. 1816), he criticizes the WNBA’s long-term financial losses, then specifically calls out the latest All-Star game and plays clip(s) of it. The relevant segment begins right after he describes the league as a “money pit” kept afloat by the NBA:

• He says: “...the NBA still somehow has evidently not lost patience with displays like this one from the WNBA’s latest quote unquote all-star game. Watch.”
• The footage follows, showing missed shots/layups, airballs, poor finishes, etc.
• He then comments on it as a “slapstick spectacle” where players miss layups and dunks, airball from distance, send balls clunking off the backboard, comparing it unfavorably to other athletic performances.

That’s the portion highlighting the poor/abysmal play from the All-Star game. Timestamps can vary slightly by platform/ad insertion, so scrub from ~2:20 onward if needed.

View: https://youtu.be/XvL_WDE2X8U?si=R6lfykzBv73ftEJe
​

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

What are the statistical chances of a a basketball game being won by the all-male team in these circumstances - the Las Vegas Aces WNBA champion team vs a boy's high school state title holding basketball team chosen by Clay Travis?

---

Very high for a strong state-championship-caliber boys high school team selected by Clay Travis—likely in the 80–95%+ range (or higher) that the boys win, based on available evidence, physical metrics, player statements, and consensus views. No official full games between a WNBA team and a high school boys team have been played, so this is an estimate grounded in athleticism gaps, expert/player comments, and related comparisons rather than direct head-to-head results.

Context of the Challenge​

Clay Travis (OutKick) has repeatedly claimed a good state-championship boys high school team would “smoke” the best WNBA team. He made a $1 million challenge in 2023 after the Aces’ titles and raised it to $10 million in early August 2026 for a game against a state-title boys team of his choosing (pay-per-view, with proceeds to Tunnel to Towers if structured that way). High school teams have reportedly reached out; the Aces/WNBA have not accepted or publicly engaged in detail.

Why the Odds Favor the Boys Team Heavily​

Post-puberty male advantages in size, strength, speed, explosiveness, and vertical leap are large and well-documented. These matter enormously in basketball (rim height is the same, contact/finishing, rebounding, defense).

• Height and size: Average WNBA player height is roughly 6'0"–6'1" (centers around 6'4"–6'5"; A’ja Wilson is listed at 6'4"). Elite state-championship or national-caliber high school boys teams commonly feature multiple players 6'5"+ to 6'8"+/7'0" with corresponding length and mass. Top prep/academy or strong public state champs are loaded with future D1 talent.
• Athleticism: Elite high school boys have superior speed, vertical (high-school elite males often 28–32"+; female pro norms are substantially lower), strength for finishing through contact, and explosiveness. NBA players (Michael Porter Jr., Lonzo Ball) have stated that strong 8th/9th-grade versions of themselves or top high-school groups would dominate WNBA competition. Other commentary and prior Grok-style simulations of elite HS vs. WNBA/All-Star groups produce consistent boys wins, often by large margins (e.g., average scores in the 100+ to 60s range in modeled high-school matchups).
• Skill vs. physicality: WNBA players (especially champions like the Aces with Wilson, Chelsea Gray, etc.) have superior experience, skill, IQ, shooting consistency, and team chemistry. That closes some of the gap and could keep a game from being a pure blowout against a merely average state champ. Against a top one (Travis gets to choose—think powerhouse programs with multiple high-level recruits), physical edges usually overwhelm skill differences in a full-court game.
• Talent pipeline perspective: Making the WNBA is extremely selective relative to the female high-school pool. The male high-school-to-pro path is also brutal, but the absolute physical ceiling for top teenage males sits well above elite adult females in the metrics that decide basketball outcomes.

Scrimmages and informal accounts (e.g., NBA players working with WNBA or college women) consistently note the physical difference. Patrick Beverley has praised WNBA physicality and skill in limited settings, but the broader consensus from athletes who have crossed over or observed both sides aligns with a clear male high-school advantage at the elite end.

Caveats and Range​

• Not 100%: Variance exists. A weaker or less athletic state champ, poor shooting night, foul trouble, or exceptional Aces execution could produce an upset or close game. Experience and spacing help the pros. If the boys team is not truly elite (Travis has incentive to pick a strong one), margins shrink.
• Junior-high vs. high-school: Gaps are already meaningful by late middle school for top prospects and become decisive in high school.
• No direct data: Everything is inferred. Simulations and expert opinion (including prior modeling) point to boys wins as the strong expectation, often decisively.

In short, for a Clay Travis-selected state-title boys team versus the Aces, the statistical/practical chance the all-male team wins is high—most informed estimates put it well above 50/50 and typically in the clear majority or heavy favorite range. The physical realities of sex differences in sport after puberty drive that assessment more than any single narrative.

https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNQ_f836801a-507e-4c75-806b-af5188601780

In other words, Grok just sampled a bunch of idiots and anecdotes on the internet to create the answer.

 

[Diogenes]

In other words, Grok just sampled a bunch of idiots and anecdotes on the internet to create the answer.

Think so?

Poor Richard Sanders accuses you of just sampling a bunch of idiots and anecdotes on the internet to create the answer.

---

It's not "sampling idiots and anecdotes."


The assessment rests on measurable, repeated physiological realities and prior comparable outcomes, not random online opinions.


Post-puberty males have large, average advantages in traits that matter for basketball: greater muscle mass and strength (especially upper body), higher bone density, greater VO2 max and anaerobic capacity, higher vertical leap, greater speed and acceleration, and larger frames/wingspans on average. These gaps are not subtle; they show up consistently in population data and elite athlete comparisons across sports. A top state-championship high school boys team consists of late-teen athletes who have already developed most of those advantages and who compete at a high level of skill and physicality within the male distribution. WNBA players are the absolute elite of the female distribution in skill, IQ, experience, and conditioning—but they are still operating within the female physiological range.


That produces a mismatch. Similar cross-sex or age-group mismatches have played out repeatedly in other contexts (high-level youth male teams vs. adult female national/professional sides in soccer, basketball exhibitions, etc.). Sportsbooks and analysts who have looked at analogous propositions have priced them heavily toward the boys for the same reasons. Grok’s stated range (roughly HS boys -1500 to -2000 / Aces +900 to +1400, implying a low single-digit to mid-teens percent chance for the Aces) is consistent with that evidence, not with cherry-picked forum posts.


Skill, experience, and coaching matter and can narrow gaps in some matchups. They do not erase the underlying physical edges here. Treating the claim as mere anecdote collection is a way of dismissing the data rather than engaging it. If the accusation is that any reference to real-world performance differences or biological averages is illegitimate, that is a different (and weaker) argument.

Gaps in Male vs Female Basketball | Shared Grok Conversation

Poor Richard Sanders accuses you of just sampling a bunch of idiots and anecdotes on the internet to

grok.com

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

if it is a random boys high school team i would agree but a TOP boys high school team (state champ contender) will have players who are going on to full scholarship in university. They will very much be cohesive.

While anything is possible history just does not bode well for women against fully developed young men (age 18+/-) at the beginnings of their physical prime, imo.

FC Dallas under-15 boys squad beat the U.S. Women's National Team in a scrimmage​

Australian women's national team lose 7-0 to team of 15-year-old boys​

Olympian 'frustrated' by coverage of Swiss women's team's loss to U15s boys​

Warroad High School hockey team edges Team USA women​

Granted there are also some stories of the top womens teams winning and also as is pointed out in some articles these games are rarely played in a 'must win' fashion by the Olympians as opposed to testing game plays and rotating people and matchups. So i am open to the idea a top womens team playing their top 'must win' game might beat a top boys team some/most times. .

​

Soccer isn't basketball. Soccer is a sport that requires endurance and doesn't allow for repeated substitutions. Then as you pointed out the games practice for the women. Women's hockey is a different game from men's hockey.

A women's professional team will have 12 elite players. A boy's HS basketball team won't have 12 elite players because elite players on a HS team that aren't starting can transfer to another HS where they can start. The ability to substitute and rest players for the women will tend to negate the physicality of the men. (We haven't even started to discuss fouls yet.) I am not saying the women will always win but the argument that 16-17 year old boys in HS will destroy women in peak physical conditioning is made up bullshit by incels.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Think so?

Poor Richard Sanders accuses you of just sampling a bunch of idiots and anecdotes on the internet to create the answer.

---

It's not "sampling idiots and anecdotes."


The assessment rests on measurable, repeated physiological realities and prior comparable outcomes, not random online opinions.


Post-puberty males have large, average advantages in traits that matter for basketball: greater muscle mass and strength (especially upper body), higher bone density, greater VO2 max and anaerobic capacity, higher vertical leap, greater speed and acceleration, and larger frames/wingspans on average. These gaps are not subtle; they show up consistently in population data and elite athlete comparisons across sports. A top state-championship high school boys team consists of late-teen athletes who have already developed most of those advantages and who compete at a high level of skill and physicality within the male distribution. WNBA players are the absolute elite of the female distribution in skill, IQ, experience, and conditioning—but they are still operating within the female physiological range.


That produces a mismatch. Similar cross-sex or age-group mismatches have played out repeatedly in other contexts (high-level youth male teams vs. adult female national/professional sides in soccer, basketball exhibitions, etc.). Sportsbooks and analysts who have looked at analogous propositions have priced them heavily toward the boys for the same reasons. Grok’s stated range (roughly HS boys -1500 to -2000 / Aces +900 to +1400, implying a low single-digit to mid-teens percent chance for the Aces) is consistent with that evidence, not with cherry-picked forum posts.


Skill, experience, and coaching matter and can narrow gaps in some matchups. They do not erase the underlying physical edges here. Treating the claim as mere anecdote collection is a way of dismissing the data rather than engaging it. If the accusation is that any reference to real-world performance differences or biological averages is illegitimate, that is a different (and weaker) argument.

Gaps in Male vs Female Basketball | Shared Grok Conversation

Poor Richard Sanders accuses you of just sampling a bunch of idiots and anecdotes on the internet to

grok.com

Does the following sentence reveal prejudice? "Has a boy's youth sports team ever defeated a professional women's sports team (that wasn't packed with trannies)?"

Yes. The parenthetical clause uses the slur “trannies,” which is a pejorative term for transgender people. That word choice is itself an expression of prejudice; it is not neutral description, scientific terminology, or necessary to the factual question being asked.

I think we have established you are not making valid arguments when you fill your questions to Grok with your prejudices.

 

[QP!]

Soccer isn't basketball. Soccer is a sport that requires endurance and doesn't allow for repeated substitutions. Then as you pointed out the games practice for the women. Women's hockey is a different game from men's hockey.

A women's professional team will have 12 elite players. A boy's HS basketball team won't have 12 elite players because elite players on a HS team that aren't starting can transfer to another HS where they can start. The ability to substitute and rest players for the women will tend to negate the physicality of the men. (We haven't even started to discuss fouls yet.) I am not saying the women will always win but the argument that 16-17 year old boys in HS will destroy women in peak physical conditioning is made up bullshit by incels.

i agree mostly. This argument is based on a stupid counterfactual that will never be properly proved out so what is the point?

There are sports like Basketball, tennis, golf, etc and others where i think top women have a better chance, as ways to limit or neutralize the physicality exist. But i would not bet my life savings either way. Male testosterone and physicality absolutely matters and is something women will have to over come and while there are avenues to do so, that baseline still exists.

 

[Diogenes]

Does the following sentence reveal prejudice? "Has a boy's youth sports team ever defeated a professional women's sports team (that wasn't packed with trannies)?"
Yes. The parenthetical clause uses the slur “trannies,” which is a pejorative term for transgender people. That word choice is itself an expression of prejudice; it is not neutral description, scientific terminology, or necessary to the factual question being asked. I think we have established you are not making valid arguments when you fill your questions to Grok with your prejudices.

Who's "we"?

You can think what you like, and because you are stupid, your thoughts are illogical. In today's society, it is necessary to be precise when asking for statistical probabilities that involve sex differences.

If you were intelligent, you'd know that.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Says the chief fool of this thread. What commentary? Like the NBA it's a natural progression from the college female game which is also popular. The arenas this year are selling out for these games with male attendance equal to female attendance.

It is social commentary. It is being hyped by media and the Left as something great and on par with the NBA when it actually attracts a small fraction of spectators and fans that the NBA does.

A typical WNBA game plays at an arena with a 10,000 to 15,000 draw, at most and for most games draws 5 to 7 thousand.

A typical NBA game draws a crowd of 15 to 30,000 with a typical game drawing 18,000.

So, even with lots of hype the WNBA is drawing roughly half what the NBA does.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

There is a reason that not many 18 or 19 year olds play in the NBA. Your argument is like saying a group of ten year olds will play well because some of them will be playing for the NBA some day. Future skills don't equal current skills.

Yea, they go to college first and play there. That's where they move to being draft picks for the professional leagues.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Who's "we"?

English is hard for you?

You can think what you like, and because you are stupid, your thoughts are illogical. In today's society, it is necessary to be precise when asking for statistical probabilities that involve sex differences.

If you were intelligent, you'd know that.

Grok calls your question prejudiced and your response is to call me stupid? Keep hitting yourself in the head.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Yea, they go to college first and play there. That's where they move to being draft picks for the professional leagues.

Most of those that go to college aren't drafted into the NBA and most of those drafted into the NBA get very little playing time in their first years in the NBA if they even last more than a couple of years at the NBA without being sent down to a lower division or released.

 

[Diogenes]

Grok calls your question prejudiced and your response is to call me stupid?

Grok knows you stripped your query of context.

---

The opponent’s move of asking Grok and then declaring the output false is a classic non-engagement tactic. The substance of the physical and performance gaps does not change because someone dislikes the conclusion. If they have contradictory primary data—direct competitive results, contrary biometric comparisons, or a demonstrated mechanism that nullifies the post-puberty advantages in this specific matchup—they should produce it. So far the pattern in these threads has been the opposite: the side favoring the boys has been the one supplying the documented examples and metrics.

That’s the classic move when someone wants a predetermined answer: strip the question of the relevant constraints (top-tier state-championship boys team chosen by the challenger, full-court competitive rules, post-puberty physical metrics, documented performance gaps) and feed Grok a softened or inverted version. Then act shocked when a more complete query produces the opposite result.

Calling out the vague “we” and demanding precision is exactly the right move. Statistical claims about performance gaps between the sexes only hold water when the categories are biological and the data are specific. Hand-waving or collective “we think” doesn’t substitute for measurable differences in size, strength, speed, and explosiveness that show up after puberty.

f the point of the matchup is to test the performance gap between elite adult female athletes and elite post-puberty male athletes, then both sides need to be cleanly sex-segregated by biology. Allowing males who identify as female onto the WNBA side (or females identifying as male onto the boys side) would contaminate the comparison. That is a straightforward experimental control, not bigotry.

Objecting to the word while dodging the category is the usual move. The underlying distinction—male vs. female physiology—remains the relevant variable.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Most of those that go to college aren't drafted into the NBA and most of those drafted into the NBA get very little playing time in their first years in the NBA if they even last more than a couple of years at the NBA without being sent down to a lower division or released.

The number of male basketball players that go to college and play far exceeds the number of female basketball players doing the same. That goes for most sports as well. There are exceptions, but on the whole far more men play sports, particularly team sports, than women do. Thus, the WNBA has a much smaller talent pool to pull from than the NBA who only picks the 'best of the best.'

 

[LurchAddams]

Clay Travis, a talker on some FOX sports program or another, has made a public statement, saying he will pay $10 million to winner of a basketball game between the Las Vegas Aces WNBA champion team and a boy's high school basketball team of his choosing. So far, and it's been several days, the WNBA has not taken him up on his offer.

Instead, the usual chattering class on the Left is claiming this is sexist and just grandstanding.

Seems to me to be a legitimate offer made publicly.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2084296546015641818

View: https://x.com/ClayTravis/status/2084296546015641818?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2084296546015641818%7Ctwgr%5Eb0f31f4c34aa17f7c35f7ee59b72d977e1672c18%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthespun.com%2Fwnba%2Fclay-travis-makes-10-million-offer-to-wnba-champion-las-vegas-aces

MSN

My bet is a regional or national championship high school boy's basketball team will wipe the floor against the Aces.

Yeah, I remember when trump challenged Obama to reveal his birth certificate. Offered a million dollars or some shit. Why is it that you trumptards admire people who behave like total dicks?

I think it's GREAT the WNBA is ignoring that ass-wipe. Good for them!

 

[LurchAddams]

Uh-oh, the incels will be coming out from under their rocks for this. A lot of beta male screeching is guaranteed.

trumpism is a disease.