The most secure election ever and other lies.

[Into the Night]

What haven't I posted?

If you're referring to the affidavit, here it is again:

https://www.pacourts.us/Storage/media/pdfs/20210603/212420-file-10836.pdf

If you want to see the Inspector General's investigation findings:

USPS Inspector General report on Jesse Morgan allegation of 2020 missing mail ballots

www.documentcloud.org

Nothing to do with any affidavit, Void. Strawman fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

I guess @IBDaMann is done talking about affidavits.

You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void.

 

[ZenMode]

You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void.

You can't make evidence appear. Void.

 

[Into the Night]

You can't make evidence appear. Void.

You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void. I am not you.

 

[ZenMode]

You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void.

You can't make evidence appear. Void and what little evidence you and @IBDaMann have left is slowly dissipating. With enough time and information, I'd bet that all of the eyewitness testimony would be found to be meaningless.

I am not you.

 

[Nordberg]

The constitution allows for the federal legislation to set requirements.

Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution (the Elections Clause) is the primary provision.

“The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing (sic) Senators.”

By law. Not Trump deciding. Nor does it give Trump the right to grab the ballots and records of individual states This has never been a problem because we did not have a person prone to cheating like Trump before. The difference in the equation is Trump, who does not care about fair and honest voting. He simply wants to win regardless of the laws and regulations.

 

[Ross Dolan]

Trump and his enablers have had 6 years to present evidence of sufficient fraud to alter the 2020 election...and have attempted to do so over 60 times. All but one attempt have been thrown out of court...in effect, laughed at by judges. But they all still cling to the fantasy because the Moron-in-Chief commands them to do so,

Best thing one can do with that scenario is to use it for its entertainment value. THEY are laughable...and best you laugh, because you are not going to change their minds until their Fuhrer gives them instructions to do so.

Do not bet on that ever happening!

 

[ModernDiogenes]

So we all knew 2020 was not a secure election. The evidence reveals that Communist China did not want Trump to win in 2020. China hacked our election voter roles. The Dems still want to allow for fraudulent elections. Providing proof of citizenship and a photo ID is a reasonable step to reduce cheating . But of course Democrats don't want voter ID.

Please back that statement up either facts. Like one investigation that proves China successfully hacked and altered our voter rolls. Dint just state what your case is, make that case stand up for itself.

If you can not do so, admit your case isn’t actually well founded and put it down as it’s not reality based. It’s about “feelings”.

 

[ModernDiogenes]

Trump and his enablers have had 6 years to present evidence of sufficient fraud to alter the 2020 election...and have attempted to do so over 60 times. All but one attempt have been thrown out of court...in effect, laughed at by judges. But they all still cling to the fantasy because the Moron-in-Chief commands them to do so,

Best thing one can do with that scenario is to use it for its entertainment value. THEY are laughable...and best you laugh, because you are not going to change their minds until their Fuhrer gives them instructions to do so.

Do not bet on that ever happening!

This registered Republican can not leave it at laughing because this “alt fact” universe MAGA insists on generating and regenerating is a threat to common sense, pragmatic particulars thinking, and ethics.

Trump is a professional con man. The “author” of a ghost written rotten book on business no actual businessperson takes seriously. The “star” of an even more rotten “scripted reality” TV show, who outside his “alt fact” universe is in reality a betraying, grifting, cheating, lying malignant pathological narcissist. MAGA, in their support of him, state they are just fine with that so their character and ethics are in doubt.

2+2=4 folks. Things are what they are and not what we’d like to call them if we just make things up in that process. The public record is very clear on what Trump is, and if you support that it’s strongly suggestive that your thinking on right vs wrong is compromised.

That isn’t a political statement. Want what you want as to policy, but be vastly more selective about who you choose to represent it. It speaks volumes about what you’re saying about yourself.

 

[Ross Dolan]

This registered Republican can not leave it at laughing because this “alt fact” universe MAGA insists on generating and regenerating is a threat to common sense, pragmatic particulars thinking, and ethics.

Trump is a professional con man. The “author” of a ghost written rotten book on business no actual businessperson takes seriously. The “star” of an even more rotten “scripted reality” TV show, who outside his “alt fact” universe is in reality a betraying, grifting, cheating, lying malignant pathological narcissist. MAGA, in their support of him, state they are just fine with that so their character and ethics are in doubt.

2+2=4 folks. Things are what they are and not what we’d like to call them if we just make things up in that process. The public record is very clear on what Trump is, and if you support that it’s strongly suggestive that your thinking on right vs wrong is compromised.

That isn’t a political statement. Want what you want as to policy, but be vastly more selective about who you choose to represent it. It speaks volumes about what you’re saying about yourself.

When describing Trump, you left out the word "scumbag." Other than that, I agree with the tone and essence of what you have to say. Unfortunately, we Americans have twice chosen him to be the face of our nation to the world. My guess is that historians of the future will treat the 12 years ending in 2028 with searing contempt.

Let's hope so.

 

[QP!]

This registered Republican can not leave it at laughing because this “alt fact” universe MAGA insists on generating and regenerating is a threat to common sense, pragmatic particulars thinking, and ethics.

Trump is a professional con man. The “author” of a ghost written rotten book on business no actual businessperson takes seriously. The “star” of an even more rotten “scripted reality” TV show, who outside his “alt fact” universe is in reality a betraying, grifting, cheating, lying malignant pathological narcissist. MAGA, in their support of him, state they are just fine with that so their character and ethics are in doubt.

2+2=4 folks. Things are what they are and not what we’d like to call them if we just make things up in that process. The public record is very clear on what Trump is, and if you support that it’s strongly suggestive that your thinking on right vs wrong is compromised.

That isn’t a political statement. Want what you want as to policy, but be vastly more selective about who you choose to represent it. It speaks volumes about what you’re saying about yourself.

To understand Trump one need only understand this.

He created both a Charity and a University that both had to be closed by the government due to misuse of funds and not providing the services to most vulnerable people.

His charity targeted veterans and seniors specifically and the people who tend to donate to them, and his university targeted his youngest, most ambitious supporters with the promise of a cheaper education that would help them make lots of money without the big university expense.

Both ended up being shams that took advantage of the people least able to afford it.

That is who Trump is and still is. Even as he rakes in billions now via crypto scams and insider dealings, he still is involved in launching pure scams like his Trump cell phone, which has no product and likely never will but was designed to get his most loyal followers (the poorest) to give him non refundable money.

If Trump sees a person, any person, who he thinks he can con out of their last dollars he will NEVER not take that money off the table and into his pocket no matter how rich he is.

He truly believes a 'sucker and his money need to be parted'.

 

[martin]

Please back that statement up either facts. Like one investigation that proves China successfully hacked and altered our voter rolls. Dint just state what your case is, make that case stand up for itself.

If you can not do so, admit your case isn’t actually well founded and put it down as it’s not reality based. It’s about “feelings”.

Well said and to no avail. If posters like the one you quoted deferred from expressing feelings/wishes as if they were facts this would be a very one-sided forum.

 

[ModernDiogenes]

To understand Trump one need only understand this.

He created both a Charity and a University that both had to be closed by the government due to misuse of funds and not providing the services to most vulnerable people.

His charity targeted veterans and seniors specifically and the people who tend to donate to them, and his university targeted his youngest, most ambitious supporters with the promise of a cheaper education that would help them make lots of money without the big university expense.

Both ended up being shams that took advantage of the people least able to afford it.

That is who Trump is and still is. Even as he rakes in billions now via crypto scams and insider dealings, he still is involved in launching pure scams like his Trump cell phone, which has no product and likely never will but was designed to get his most loyal followers (the poorest) to give him non refundable money.

If Trump sees a person, any person, who he thinks he can con out of their last dollars he will NEVER not take that money off the table and into his pocket no matter how rich he is.

He truly believes a 'sucker and his money need to be parted'.

Precisely, and not far from my own words used to describe exactly that in other venues on the topic of Trump.

All documented in the public record, so it’s verifiable. It’s not just opinion. It’s actual fact b

 

[IBDaMann]

Void and what little evidence you and @IBDaMann have left is slowly dissipating.

You have no way of knowing anything about that which you willfully ignore.

You err when you equate: * willful ignoring * = * it does not exist *

Example ZenMode.willfullIgnoring(thermodynamics) = thermodynamics does not apply.

 

[ZenMode]

You have no way of knowing anything about that which you willfully ignore.

You err when you equate: * willful ignoring * = * it does not exist *

Example ZenMode.willfullIgnoring(thermodynamics) = thermodynamics does not apply.

I don't ignore anything. I was the one who had to inform YOU about the outcome of YOUR magical semi trailer, otherwise there is ZERO chance you'd ever know about the investigation. Why? Because your news sources don't care about accuracy.

 

[IBDaMann]

I don't ignore anything.

We've been over this perhaps a hundred times. You deliberately ignore every single sworn affidavit on the orders of your political party. You always defer to the people who do your thinking for you, not eye witnesses giving sworn testimony.

I was the one who had to inform YOU about the outcome of YOUR magical semi trailer,

You began talking about some fabricated event that never happened. You refuse to discuss any actual sword affidavits. I'm waiting for you to post one, here in this thread, for us to discuss.

 

[martin]

Please back that statement up either facts. Like one investigation that proves China successfully hacked and altered our voter rolls. Dint just state what your case is, make that case stand up for itself.

If you can not do so, admit your case isn’t actually well founded and put it down as it’s not reality based. It’s about “feelings”.

His evidence is the evidence of all election deniers - the words of the loser. Words, just words for almost six pointless years.

 

[ZenMode]

You began talking about some fabricated event that never happened.

Thanks for confirming you're a conspiracy theorist.

You refuse to discuss any actual sword affidavits. I'm waiting for you to post one, here in this thread, for us to discuss.

I posted one and I posted the results of the investigation.

Done lying?

 

[IBDaMann]

Thanks for confirming you're a conspiracy theorist.

Sure. Thanks for confirming that you do not acknowledge that humans conspire.

I posted one

You did not. You posted an article. Thanks for confirming that you don't understand that different things are different things.

and I posted the results of the investigation [by the people who committed the election fraud].

FTFY. Do you have anything more credible, e.g. sworn affidavits?


Done lying?

 

[ZenMode]

Sure. Thanks for confirming that you do not acknowledge that humans conspire.

We both know what I mean by conspiracy theorists, but you don't seem to be able to be honest, so.....

You did not. You posted an article. Thanks for confirming that you don't understand that different things are different things.

Nope. Neither is an article. Here is the affidavit again here.

And here is the report on the investigation.

And, in case you intend to keep lying, here is a link to my original post from July 31st.

FTFY. Do you have anything more credible, e.g. sworn affidavits?

pwned.

Done lying?

I'm not the liar here.