The most secure election ever and other lies.

[IBDaMann]

We both know what I mean by conspiracy theorists

...that you a pretending that humans never conspire. There is no other meaning you could possibly mean, but you don't seem to be able to be honest, so.....

Nope. Neither is an article. Here is the affidavit again here.

Yes, this is one of the affidavits I posted way back when. I'm still waiting for you to point to that key part in the affidavit where he makes his conclusory statement about what he saw (i.e. what he thought he saw) instead of explaining what he can verify he saw.

Your whole argument is that sworn eyewitness testimony that runs counter to what your political thought-masters command you to believe is automatically "conclusory" and erroneous, i.e. it is a mistaken account of only what he thought he saw. This is an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence. You can start by showing what conclusory statements are made, and then we can discuss how you know them to be erroneous.

And here is the report on the [ scramble for damage control by the post office who absolutely needs to get out from under this ]

FTFY. The Postal Inspector General, in trying to frantically perform damage control, only included statements from workers they knew would not have seen anything, so the report could read "none can corroborate the story."

Your Post Office damage control is dimissed. I'm not the liar here.

 

[ZenMode]

Postal Inspector General, in trying to frantically perform damage control, only included statements from workers they knew would not have seen anything, so the report could read "none can corroborate the story."

And there's the next layer of the conspiracy!

It doesn't matter who invested or what they found. Unless what they found aligns with what you want to believe, you'll just keep layering on conspiracy after conspiracy.

If Patel's FBI investigated and found nothing, you'd label him as the deep state or a sell out or incompetent or layer on some other conspiracy to maintain your beliefs.

 

[IBDaMann]

And there's the next layer of the conspiracy!

And there's that denial that humans conspire. Too funny!

I'll bet that you will deny that the Postmaster General met with key stakeholders before being told to launch an "investigation'.

It doesn't matter who invested or what they found.

Whoa, easy there with the dishonesty overload. Read the Postmaster General's damage control again and note how it was crafted to not find anything, one way or the other. They conveniently didn't find anything.

Stop the lying already.

Too funny! You're a grown adult who professes that humans never conspire!

If Patel's FBI investigated and found nothing,

Don't pretend to speak for me ... or do I get to speak for you?

 

[ZenMode]

And there's that denial that humans conspire. Too funny!

Nope. Try again.

I'll bet that you will deny that the Postmaster General met with key stakeholders before being told to launch an "investigation'.

And, there's the next layer of the conspiracy!

Keep stacking....

Whoa, easy there with the dishonesty overload. Read the Postmaster General's damage control again and note how it was crafted to not find anything, one way or the other. They conveniently didn't find anything.

Oh, sure sure. Of course it was because it couldn't just be that truck driver was wrong.

Stop the lying already.

Lol.

Too funny! You're a grown adult who professes that humans never conspire!

You don't seem to understand the difference between the fact that humans do conspire and finding conspiracies where they don't exist.. because you are a conspiracy theorist.

Don't pretend to speak for me ... or do I get to speak for you?

I'm not wrong, Mr. Tin Foil hat.

 

[Into the Night]

You can't make evidence appear.

You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void.

Void and what little evidence you and @IBDaMann have left is slowly dissipating.

I am not you, Void.

With enough time and information, I'd bet that all of the eyewitness testimony would be found to be meaningless.

You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void.

 

[Into the Night]

Nope. Try again.

And, there's the next layer of the conspiracy!

Keep stacking....

The Democrat party is a conspiracy, Void.

Oh, sure sure. Of course it was because it couldn't just be that truck driver was wrong.

He was wrong.

Lol.

You don't seem to understand the difference between the fact that humans do conspire and finding conspiracies where they don't exist.. because you are a conspiracy theorist.

The Democrat party is a conspiracy, Void. It is no theory.

I'm not wrong, Mr. Tin Foil hat.

You are wrong. Tin foil is very hard to get these days.

 

[Into the Night]

And there's the next layer of the conspiracy!

It doesn't matter who invested or what they found. Unless what they found aligns with what you want to believe, you'll just keep layering on conspiracy after conspiracy.

If Patel's FBI investigated and found nothing, you'd label him as the deep state or a sell out or incompetent or layer on some other conspiracy to maintain your beliefs.

The Democrat party is a conspiracy, Void. It is no theory.
You cannot make any evidence just disappear.

 

[ZenMode]

You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void.

You can't make evidence appear. Void.

I am not you, Void.

You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void.

You can't make evidence appear. Void.

 

[ZenMode]

The Democrat party is a conspiracy, Void. It is no theory.

Argument by Repetition Fallacy. Void.

You cannot make any evidence just disappear.

Argument by Repetition Fallacy. Void.

 

[ZenMode]

The Democrat party is a conspiracy, Void. It is no theory.

Argument by Repetition Fallacy. Void.

You cannot make any evidence just disappear.

Argument by Repetition Fallacy. Void.

 

[martin]

Argument by Repetition Fallacy. Void.

True believers are not to be deterred. In Germany there's a cult that thinks Hitler won the war but was then murdered by traitors who gave it up. He's in that category. Let him go.

 

[Nordberg]

The Repugs won all 3 branches and bitched about the safety and security of elections. They are clowns.

 

[IBDaMann]

And, there's the next layer of the conspiracy!

... so you deny it! Thank you. We're done here, I suppose.

Oh, sure sure. Of course it was because it couldn't just be that truck driver was wrong.

Exactly. Sworn eyewitness testimony beats political damage control, especially "Wouldn't you know it, I couldn't find any of my subordinates who corroborate the sworn eyewitness testimony that makes me look really bad."

You don't seem to understand the difference between the fact that humans do conspire and finding conspiracies where they don't exist..

You point directly to conspiracy and say "Nope, there's no conspiracy here! .... because humans don't ever conspire, and If you ever claim that humans conspire when they are conspiring, I will call you a 'conspiracy theorist' in an effort to mock you for thinking that humans conspire."

 

[ZenMode]

... so you deny it! Thank you. We're done here, I suppose.

Nope. Again, the fact that humans conspire doesn't mean every situation is the result of humans conspiring.

BTW, you already know that and are playing dumb.

Exactly. Sworn eyewitness testimony beats political damage control,

"Political damage control" is another aspect of the conspiracy theory. You can't double down on a conspiracy theory to prove your conspiracy theory.

especially "Wouldn't you know it, I couldn't find any of my subordinates who corroborate the sworn eyewitness testimony that makes me look really bad."

Another layer of the conspiracy.....

You point directly to conspiracy and say "Nope, there's no conspiracy here! .

I point to a situation where ONE person claims something happened, multiple pieces of evidence bring his claims into doubt and multiple investigations didn't find anything.

You see, the nice part about not being a conspiracy theorist is that you can just take things at face value when forming your opinions and beliefs.

You should try it.

... because humans don't ever conspire,

#Strawman

and If you ever claim that humans conspire when they are conspiring, I will call you a 'conspiracy theorist' in an effort to mock you for thinking that humans conspire."

"Conspiracy theorist" doesn't refer to someone who identifies an actual conspiracy. Again, you already know that but insist on playing dumb.

 

[QP!]

...

BTW, you already know that and are playing dumb...

Trust me. He ain't playing.

 

[IBDaMann]

Nope. Again, the fact that humans conspire doesn't mean every situation is the result of humans conspiring.

Now you have me confused. What do you mean by "conspiracy theorist" if you aren't mocking others for believing that humans conspire?

"Political damage control" is another aspect of the conspiracy theory.

There's no theory involved. The Postal Service was involved in the stealing of an election and had to scramble for damage control. You read it yourself.

You can't double down on a conspiracy theory to prove your conspiracy theory.

You can't double down on your insistence that humans never conspire to prove that you actually believe that humans conspire.

I point to a situation where ONE person claims something happened

You need to show me where in that affidavit i can find conclusions that are not observations. You still haven't done that. You still haven't posted any affidavits that aren't what I posted back when we first discussed this issue.

You see, the nice part about not being a conspiracy theorist is ...

I get it, you don't believe humans ever conspire. You are stupid in this regard.

 

[ZenMode]

Now you have me confused. What do you mean by "conspiracy theorist" if you aren't mocking others for believing that humans conspire?

you already know. stop trying to change the subject.

There's no theory involved. The Postal Service was involved in the stealing of an election and had to scramble for damage control. You read it yourself.

Thanks for restarting your conspiracy theory. You still can't use doubling down to prove your original conspiracy theory.

You can't double down on your insistence that humans never conspire to prove that you actually believe that humans conspire.

Ignored because now you're just lying.

You need to show me where in that affidavit i can find conclusions that are not observations. You still haven't done that. You still haven't posted any affidavits that aren't what I posted back when we first discussed this issue.

Right. Your "chosen one" affidavit, that you've been focusing on for years, was investigated and the claims were unsupported. Rather than acknowledging that the driver was either wrong or lying, you manufacture an elaborate story.... aka conspiracy theory.

I get it, you don't believe humans ever conspire. You are stupid in this regard.

More lies. More playing dumb.

 

[IBDaMann]

you already know.

You don't get to declare what I know and what I don't. Explain what you mean by ridiculing others for recognizing that people conspire? Are you telling me that you went to all this trouble just to forfeit yet again?

Thanks for restarting your conspiracy theory.

OK, I get it, you're doubling down on your insistence that humans never conspire. Now you get to explain yourself.

Ignored because now you're just lying.

Good. I can use this.

 

[ZenMode]

You don't get to declare what I know and what I don't. Explain what you mean by ridiculing others for recognizing that people conspire? Are you telling me that you went to all this trouble just to forfeit yet again?

I will say it again because you insist on playing dumb and being dishonest.

I have never said that humans don't conspire. I am absolutely, 100% certain that humans can and do conspire.

OK, I get it, you're doubling down on your insistence that humans never conspire. Now you get to explain yourself.

More lies. I have never once said that humans never conspire. You are claiming the conspiracy and you have provided shit to support that other than your usual conspiracy theories... Which you continue to layer one on top of the last..

 

[Into the Night]

You can't make evidence appear. Void.

You can't make evidence appear. Void.

Repetition fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacies.
It won't work, Void. You can't make any evidence just disappear.