Into the Night
Contributor
DESPITE the election fraud by Democrats.The Repugs won all 3 branches and bitched about the safety and security of elections. They are clowns.
DESPITE the election fraud by Democrats.The Repugs won all 3 branches and bitched about the safety and security of elections. They are clowns.
He just ignores any evidence. He thinks he can actually make it disappear like that.... so you deny it! Thank you. We're done here, I suppose.
Exactly. Sworn eyewitness testimony beats political damage control, especially "Wouldn't you know it, I couldn't find any of my subordinates who corroborate the sworn eyewitness testimony that makes me look really bad."
You point directly to conspiracy and say "Nope, there's no conspiracy here! .... because humans don't ever conspire, and If you ever claim that humans conspire when they are conspiring, I will call you a 'conspiracy theorist' in an effort to mock you for thinking that humans conspire."
I will say it again because you insist on playing dumb and being dishonest. You absolutely say everything that you directly imply. You refuse to explain your implication that humans never conspire because then you would actually have to say it, and then you wouldn't be able to say that you never said it.I have never said that humans don't conspire.
... so you are a conspiracy theorist, yes?I am absolutely, 100% certain that humans can and do conspire.
There was no reporting on Hillary's pricing schedule for delivering Ambassadors for assassination.Hillary Clinton:
* colluding with foreign nations for personal gain
* espionage
Yes. You've said "You can't make any evidence just disappear." repeatedly.Repetition fallacy.
Incoherent babbling.Argument of the Stone fallacies.
You can't make evidence appear. Void.It won't work, Void. You can't make any evidence just disappear.
You continue to lie because it's all you have. I've specifically said that humans DO conspire.I will say it again because you insist on playing dumb and being dishonest. You absolutely say everything that you directly imply. You refuse to explain your implication that humans never conspire because then you would actually have to say it, and then you wouldn't be able to say that you never said it.
Just because humans DO conspire doesn't mean they conspired in every situation where you WANT them to.You are a liar. This subject closed out when you mocked me for acknowledging that humans conspire. Your argument is absurd and you are dismissed.
... so you are a conspiracy theorist, yes?
So, you admit to being a conspiracy theorist, yes?You continue to lie because it's all you have. I've specifically said that humans DO conspire.
I would keep avoiding, too, if I were you.So, you admit to being a conspiracy theorist, yes?
I've specifically said that humans DO conspire.
So, you admit to being a conspiracy theorist, yes?
FTFYI [ will ] keep avoiding, ...
FTFY
As I said previously, acknowledging that human DO conspire doesn't mean that every situation IS a conspiracy, yet you keep stacking conspiracy on top of conspiracy, as I referenced earlier, to continue believing what you WANT to believe.FTFY
The few I'm aware of have been shown to be wrong.He just ignores any evidence. He thinks he can actually make it disappear like that.
* numerous sworn affidavits
Of?* security camera footage
that's not fraud and also not true.* demonstrable weaknesses in voter machine software
How often does this happen?* people who show up to vote and find out they've 'already voted'.
An entire movie was dedicated to this claim and that movie didn't show one mule.* use of 'mules' to stuff ballot boxes
That's not automatically fraud.* accepting votes beyond election day
also not fraud, as was proven by the Cyber Ninjas audit of AZ, which had offered no excuse mail-in voting for over a decade at that time.* use of mass mail-in voting
The biggest instance of thatbwasbin NJ. 400 illegals. Woukd Trump have won in 2020 without 400 votee?* illegal aliens voting
After Trump's lies about the 2020 election, where he claimed thousands of dead people voted, Georgia did a full audit and found 4. They were all situations where someone voted for a deceased family member.* dead people voting
Improbability isn't fraud.* mathematical improbability of tabulation pattern, showing mysterious spike all for Democrats
Also not fraud, dependingon the state laws.* counting without observers after hours
Wimdows were covered so counters could do their job without the far right, conspiracy theiry morons interfering.* boarding up windows to count after hours
also not fraud.* counting that goes on for weeks or even a month
also not fraud.* unauthorized personnel choosing electoral college members
You actually there are equipment issues only in conservative areas???* voting equipment that mysteriously only fail in conservative areas
You don’t seem to understand what actual voter fraud is.Democrats deny this evidence, hoping to make it go away. This is not just Void's problem. It is a DEMOCRAT problem.
But it won't go away.
FTFY. There are infinite things that such an acknowledgement does not mean.As I said previously, acknowledging that human DO conspire doesn't mean that purple leprechauns migrate through Arctic waters
There are hundreds of thousands of convictions for conspiracy, so there's no doubt that people conspire.FTFY. There are infinite things that such an acknowledgement does not mean.
I need you to be honest for a change and to answer the question. Do you accept theories of human conspiracy, or do you reject them all?
... specifically because you ignore them, and the ones you inadvertently read you summarily declare to be wrong.The few I'm aware of have been shown to be wrong.
Election fraud, captured on video. You completely ignored it when it was posted because you couldn't pretend that something that wasn't occurring in the video was somehow occurring in the video, and what was occurring in the video was somehow not occurring in the video.
It's absolutely true and fully explained in sworn affidavits. Of course, you dishonestly refer to technical explanations and procedural reviews as "people saying what they believe they saw," i.e. we have you down as simply forfeiting across the board on the sworn affidavits.that's not fraud and also not true.
What is the "acceptable amount" established by your echo chamber?How often does this happen?
Well, there you have it. If it wasn't in a particular movie, it obviously didn't happen.An entire movie was dedicated to this claim and that movie didn't show one mule.
Of course you acknowledge the fraud wherever it is fraud, right? By the way, Into the Night was talking about that fraud.That's not automatically fraud.
You don't understand the word "proven". Nick Shirley effectively debunks the "no massive illegal alien election fraud" and "no massive mail-in voting election fraud" myths. Of course, the echo chamber reverberates with "Nick Shirley's claims are false!" while engaging in your favorite tactic of fabricating things that Nick Shirley has never done.also not fraud, as was proven by the Cyber Ninjas audit of AZ,
Nope. But I find it hilarious that you cling to @LurchAddams' axiom that there is an unspoken amount of DNC cheating that is acceptable, and that all DNC cheating falls within that "acceptable" amount.The biggest instance of thatbwasbin NJ. 400 illegals.
Would Trump have won if the DNC had not stolen the election? Actually, this is a bogus question. Trump won the 2020 election; he just wasn't allowed to take office, and We the People and the States were thwarted by the DNC in deciding who the President will be.Woukd Trump have won in 2020 without 400 votee?
After your lies about the 2020 election ...After Trump's lies about the 2020 election ...
Nick Shirley confirmed the massive scale of dead-person voting, all within the "acceptable" limit of DNC cheating, of course.where he claimed thousands of dead people voted,
FTFY.Georgia [cheating collaborators] did a full [preemptive] "audit" and [ignored the massive fraud in which they participated ].
Nope. In most cases, the families are unaware that their deceased relative is miraculously voting in elections, sometimes in multiple elections because there is no risk of the dead person ever going to jail.They were all situations where someone voted for a deceased family member.
... but you acknowledge the fraud everywhere the fraud occurs, yes?Improbability isn't fraud.
... and you fully acknowledge all the fraud in those States where it is illegal, yes?Also not fraud, dependingon the state laws.
Windows were covered so cheaters could cheat without observers observing.Wimdows were covered so counters could do their job without the far right, conspiracy theiry morons interfering.
Of course you recognize the fraud of counting votes beyond the allowed counting period.also not fraud.
It absolutely is fraud. What part of fraud isn't fraud? It would be easier for us to agree that this fraud falls within the DNC's acceptable fraud limit.also not fraud.
You really should have stayed awake in English class.You actually there are equipment issues only in conservative areas???
You don't seem to know what actual election fraud is.You don’t seem to understand what actual voter fraud is.
That's a great answer to a question that nobody is asking at the moment.There are hundreds of thousands of convictions for conspiracy, so there's no doubt that people conspire.
Nope. The question before you is "Do you accept theories of human conspiracy, or do you reject them all?"The issue here is that you, ...
Wall of text ignored. Try to keep it under 10 pages, Princess.That's a great answer to a question that nobody is asking at the moment.
Nope. The question before you is "Do you accept theories of human conspiracy, or do you reject them all?"
Georgia [cheating collaborators] did a full [preemptive] "audit" and [ignored the massive fraud in which they participated ].... specifically because you ignore them, and the ones you inadvertently read you summarily declare to be wrong.
Election fraud, captured on video. You completely ignored it when it was posted because you couldn't pretend that something that wasn't occurring in the video was somehow occurring in the video, and what was occurring in the video was somehow not occurring in the video.
Basically, you forfeited immediately on the video evidence of election fraud.
It's absolutely true and fully explained in sworn affidavits. Of course, you dishonestly refer to technical explanations and procedural reviews as "people saying what they believe they saw," i.e. we have you down as simply forfeiting across the board on the sworn affidavits.
What is the "acceptable amount" established by your echo chamber?
Well, there you have it. If it wasn't in a particular movie, it obviously didn't happen.
This is how I know that the Holocaust didn't happen, by the way. I watched Repo Man, a movie dedicated to acquisition and conquest by physical force accompanied by great suffering and loss, and not one mention of the Holocaust, or even of WWII.
Of course you acknowledge the fraud wherever it is fraud, right? By the way, Into the Night was talking about that fraud.
You don't understand the word "proven". Nick Shirley effectively debunks the "no massive illegal alien election fraud" and "no massive mail-in voting election fraud" myths. Of course, the echo chamber reverberates with "Nick Shirley's claims are false!" while engaging in your favorite tactic of fabricating things that Nick Shirley has never done.
Nope. But I find it hilarious that you cling to @LurchAddams' axiom that there is an unspoken amount of DNC cheating that is acceptable, and that all DNC cheating falls within that "acceptable" amount.
Would Trump have won if the DNC had not stolen the election? Actually, this is a bogus question. Trump won the 2020 election; he just wasn't allowed to take office, and We the People and the States were thwarted by the DNC in deciding who the President will be.
After your lies about the 2020 election ...
Nick Shirley confirmed the massive scale of dead-person voting, all within the "acceptable" limit of DNC cheating, of course.
FTFY.
Nope. In most cases, the families are unaware that their deceased relative is miraculously voting in elections, sometimes in multiple elections because there is no risk of the dead person ever going to jail.
... but you acknowledge the fraud everywhere the fraud occurs, yes?
... and you fully acknowledge all the fraud in those States where it is illegal, yes?
Windows were covered so cheaters could cheat without observers observing.
Of course you recognize the fraud of counting votes beyond the allowed counting period.
It absolutely is fraud. What part of fraud isn't fraud? It would be easier for us to agree that this fraud falls within the DNC's acceptable fraud limit.
You really should have stayed awake in English class.
You don't seem to know what actual election fraud is.
As I just said, there are hundreds of thousands of situations where humans conspired.That's a great answer to a question that nobody is asking at the moment.
Nope. The question before you is "Do you accept theories of human conspiracy, or do you reject them all?"
Meaningless. You haven't answered the question, because you are lying about acknowledging that humans conspire.I've agreed with you repeatedly that people DO conspire.