The most secure election ever and other lies.

... so you deny it! Thank you. We're done here, I suppose.


Exactly. Sworn eyewitness testimony beats political damage control, especially "Wouldn't you know it, I couldn't find any of my subordinates who corroborate the sworn eyewitness testimony that makes me look really bad."


You point directly to conspiracy and say "Nope, there's no conspiracy here! .... because humans don't ever conspire, and If you ever claim that humans conspire when they are conspiring, I will call you a 'conspiracy theorist' in an effort to mock you for thinking that humans conspire."
He just ignores any evidence. He thinks he can actually make it disappear like that.

* numerous sworn affidavits
* security camera footage
* demonstrable weaknesses in voter machine software
* people who show up to vote and find out they've 'already voted'.
* use of 'mules' to stuff ballot boxes
* accepting votes beyond election day
* use of mass mail-in voting
* illegal aliens voting
* dead people voting
* mathematical improbability of tabulation pattern, showing mysterious spike all for Democrats
* counting without observers after hours
* boarding up windows to count after hours
* counting that goes on for weeks or even a month
* unauthorized personnel choosing electoral college members
* voting equipment that mysteriously only fail in conservative areas

Democrats deny this evidence, hoping to make it go away. This is not just Void's problem. It is a DEMOCRAT problem.
But it won't go away.
 
DEMOCRATS have been committing election fraud for decades. It was so bad in 2020 it caused the Presidential election to fault. Too many States never chose their electors, and no electoral college formed.

That year DEMOCRATS used the Covid Hoax they created to install a puppet 'president', giving Obama a 'third term'.
The first and only time the United States had no President or Vice President in it's history.

Biden went on to commit four acts of treason beyond this:

* providing the enemy with weapons and supplies in time of war
* inviting invasion of the United States
* calling for civil war against citizens of the United States (Democrats STILL want this!)
* espionage

This too is a DEMOCRAT pattern:

Hillary Clinton:
* colluding with foreign nations for personal gain
* espionage

Democrats can be describe with a simple programmatic loop:
1. Pronounce Doom and Gloom
2. blame it on Trump and/or Republicans
3. throw insults
4. repeat until dead

This is a shorter program than for a housefly.

DEMOCRATS are only interested in power and selfishness. They want rule by thuggery. They support:

* rioting
* looting
* arson
* murder and assassination
* sexual perversion as "normal"
* eliminating elections
* eliminating the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions
* instituting a dictatorship or oligarhy
* fascism
* communism
* slavery
* invasion of the United States
* radical Islam
* destructive illegal drugs

They hate capitalists, they hate women, they hate children, they hate conservatives, and they hate Trump.
They just hate.

Fortunately, people across the United States are waking up to what these losers are, and they are doing something about it. That patriotism and love of their country is not going to go away silently into the night.
 
I have never said that humans don't conspire.
I will say it again because you insist on playing dumb and being dishonest. You absolutely say everything that you directly imply. You refuse to explain your implication that humans never conspire because then you would actually have to say it, and then you wouldn't be able to say that you never said it.

You are a liar. This subject closed out when you mocked me for acknowledging that humans conspire. Your argument is absurd and you are dismissed.

I am absolutely, 100% certain that humans can and do conspire.
... so you are a conspiracy theorist, yes?
 
Hillary Clinton:
* colluding with foreign nations for personal gain
* espionage
There was no reporting on Hillary's pricing schedule for delivering Ambassadors for assassination.

Leftists believe that assassination is a valid solution option, especially if the target is not yet born.
 
I will say it again because you insist on playing dumb and being dishonest. You absolutely say everything that you directly imply. You refuse to explain your implication that humans never conspire because then you would actually have to say it, and then you wouldn't be able to say that you never said it.
You continue to lie because it's all you have. I've specifically said that humans DO conspire.

Your dishonestly is just an attempt to deflect.
You are a liar. This subject closed out when you mocked me for acknowledging that humans conspire. Your argument is absurd and you are dismissed.


... so you are a conspiracy theorist, yes?
Just because humans DO conspire doesn't mean they conspired in every situation where you WANT them to.

You are the one hyping the sworn affidavits. They are all you have to support your conspiratorial views on the 2020 election so of course you aren't going to admit that the truck driver was wrong. The only option you have, to maintain your baseless views, is to claim a conspiracy.
 
So, you admit to being a conspiracy theorist, yes?
I would keep avoiding, too, if I were you.

This whole song & dance is nothing but an attempt to avoid admitting that your stolen election, truck driving savior was wrong, as the investigation showed. Also wrong was Melissa Carone who embarrassed herself bigly In front of the Michigan legislature.

So, do you have any other affidavits that you blindly believed, never bothered to follow-up on, but used to rationalize your irrational, conspiratorial beliefs, or are you done?
 
As I said previously, acknowledging that human DO conspire doesn't mean that every situation IS a conspiracy, yet you keep stacking conspiracy on top of conspiracy, as I referenced earlier, to continue believing what you WANT to believe.

There is nothing that would convince you that the truck driver's story was wrong because any investigation would be written off as yet another conspiracy by the investigators.
 
He just ignores any evidence. He thinks he can actually make it disappear like that.

* numerous sworn affidavits
The few I'm aware of have been shown to be wrong.
* security camera footage
Of?
* demonstrable weaknesses in voter machine software
that's not fraud and also not true.
* people who show up to vote and find out they've 'already voted'.
How often does this happen?
* use of 'mules' to stuff ballot boxes
An entire movie was dedicated to this claim and that movie didn't show one mule.
* accepting votes beyond election day
That's not automatically fraud.
* use of mass mail-in voting
also not fraud, as was proven by the Cyber Ninjas audit of AZ, which had offered no excuse mail-in voting for over a decade at that time.
* illegal aliens voting
The biggest instance of thatbwasbin NJ. 400 illegals. Woukd Trump have won in 2020 without 400 votee?
* dead people voting
After Trump's lies about the 2020 election, where he claimed thousands of dead people voted, Georgia did a full audit and found 4. They were all situations where someone voted for a deceased family member.
* mathematical improbability of tabulation pattern, showing mysterious spike all for Democrats
Improbability isn't fraud.
* counting without observers after hours
Also not fraud, dependingon the state laws.
* boarding up windows to count after hours
Wimdows were covered so counters could do their job without the far right, conspiracy theiry morons interfering.
* counting that goes on for weeks or even a month
also not fraud.
* unauthorized personnel choosing electoral college members
also not fraud.
* voting equipment that mysteriously only fail in conservative areas
You actually there are equipment issues only in conservative areas???
Democrats deny this evidence, hoping to make it go away. This is not just Void's problem. It is a DEMOCRAT problem.
But it won't go away.
You don’t seem to understand what actual voter fraud is.
 
As I said previously, acknowledging that human DO conspire doesn't mean that purple leprechauns migrate through Arctic waters
FTFY. There are infinite things that such an acknowledgement does not mean.

I need you to be honest for a change and to answer the question. Do you accept theories of human conspiracy, or do you reject them all?
 
FTFY. There are infinite things that such an acknowledgement does not mean.

I need you to be honest for a change and to answer the question. Do you accept theories of human conspiracy, or do you reject them all?
There are hundreds of thousands of convictions for conspiracy, so there's no doubt that people conspire.

The issue here is that you, the conspiracy theorist, finds (creates) conspiracies to rationalize your beliefs, not because there's a legitimate reason to believe a conspiracy exists.
 
The few I'm aware of have been shown to be wrong.
... specifically because you ignore them, and the ones you inadvertently read you summarily declare to be wrong.

Election fraud, captured on video. You completely ignored it when it was posted because you couldn't pretend that something that wasn't occurring in the video was somehow occurring in the video, and what was occurring in the video was somehow not occurring in the video.

Basically, you forfeited immediately on the video evidence of election fraud.

that's not fraud and also not true.
It's absolutely true and fully explained in sworn affidavits. Of course, you dishonestly refer to technical explanations and procedural reviews as "people saying what they believe they saw," i.e. we have you down as simply forfeiting across the board on the sworn affidavits.

How often does this happen?
What is the "acceptable amount" established by your echo chamber?

An entire movie was dedicated to this claim and that movie didn't show one mule.
Well, there you have it. If it wasn't in a particular movie, it obviously didn't happen.

This is how I know that the Holocaust didn't happen, by the way. I watched Repo Man, a movie dedicated to acquisition and conquest by physical force accompanied by great suffering and loss, and not one mention of the Holocaust, or even of WWII.

That's not automatically fraud.
Of course you acknowledge the fraud wherever it is fraud, right? By the way, Into the Night was talking about that fraud.

also not fraud, as was proven by the Cyber Ninjas audit of AZ,
You don't understand the word "proven". Nick Shirley effectively debunks the "no massive illegal alien election fraud" and "no massive mail-in voting election fraud" myths. Of course, the echo chamber reverberates with "Nick Shirley's claims are false!" while engaging in your favorite tactic of fabricating things that Nick Shirley has never done.

The biggest instance of thatbwasbin NJ. 400 illegals.
Nope. But I find it hilarious that you cling to @LurchAddams' axiom that there is an unspoken amount of DNC cheating that is acceptable, and that all DNC cheating falls within that "acceptable" amount.

Woukd Trump have won in 2020 without 400 votee?
Would Trump have won if the DNC had not stolen the election? Actually, this is a bogus question. Trump won the 2020 election; he just wasn't allowed to take office, and We the People and the States were thwarted by the DNC in deciding who the President will be.

After Trump's lies about the 2020 election ...
After your lies about the 2020 election ...

where he claimed thousands of dead people voted,
Nick Shirley confirmed the massive scale of dead-person voting, all within the "acceptable" limit of DNC cheating, of course.

Georgia [cheating collaborators] did a full [preemptive] "audit" and [ignored the massive fraud in which they participated ].
FTFY.

They were all situations where someone voted for a deceased family member.
Nope. In most cases, the families are unaware that their deceased relative is miraculously voting in elections, sometimes in multiple elections because there is no risk of the dead person ever going to jail.

Improbability isn't fraud.
... but you acknowledge the fraud everywhere the fraud occurs, yes?

Also not fraud, dependingon the state laws.
... and you fully acknowledge all the fraud in those States where it is illegal, yes?

Wimdows were covered so counters could do their job without the far right, conspiracy theiry morons interfering.
Windows were covered so cheaters could cheat without observers observing.

also not fraud.
Of course you recognize the fraud of counting votes beyond the allowed counting period.

also not fraud.
It absolutely is fraud. What part of fraud isn't fraud? It would be easier for us to agree that this fraud falls within the DNC's acceptable fraud limit.

You actually there are equipment issues only in conservative areas???
You really should have stayed awake in English class.

You don’t seem to understand what actual voter fraud is.
You don't seem to know what actual election fraud is.
 
That's a great answer to a question that nobody is asking at the moment.


Nope. The question before you is "Do you accept theories of human conspiracy, or do you reject them all?"
Wall of text ignored. Try to keep it under 10 pages, Princess.
 
... specifically because you ignore them, and the ones you inadvertently read you summarily declare to be wrong.


Election fraud, captured on video. You completely ignored it when it was posted because you couldn't pretend that something that wasn't occurring in the video was somehow occurring in the video, and what was occurring in the video was somehow not occurring in the video.

Basically, you forfeited immediately on the video evidence of election fraud.


It's absolutely true and fully explained in sworn affidavits. Of course, you dishonestly refer to technical explanations and procedural reviews as "people saying what they believe they saw," i.e. we have you down as simply forfeiting across the board on the sworn affidavits.


What is the "acceptable amount" established by your echo chamber?


Well, there you have it. If it wasn't in a particular movie, it obviously didn't happen.

This is how I know that the Holocaust didn't happen, by the way. I watched Repo Man, a movie dedicated to acquisition and conquest by physical force accompanied by great suffering and loss, and not one mention of the Holocaust, or even of WWII.


Of course you acknowledge the fraud wherever it is fraud, right? By the way, Into the Night was talking about that fraud.


You don't understand the word "proven". Nick Shirley effectively debunks the "no massive illegal alien election fraud" and "no massive mail-in voting election fraud" myths. Of course, the echo chamber reverberates with "Nick Shirley's claims are false!" while engaging in your favorite tactic of fabricating things that Nick Shirley has never done.


Nope. But I find it hilarious that you cling to @LurchAddams' axiom that there is an unspoken amount of DNC cheating that is acceptable, and that all DNC cheating falls within that "acceptable" amount.


Would Trump have won if the DNC had not stolen the election? Actually, this is a bogus question. Trump won the 2020 election; he just wasn't allowed to take office, and We the People and the States were thwarted by the DNC in deciding who the President will be.


After your lies about the 2020 election ...


Nick Shirley confirmed the massive scale of dead-person voting, all within the "acceptable" limit of DNC cheating, of course.


FTFY.


Nope. In most cases, the families are unaware that their deceased relative is miraculously voting in elections, sometimes in multiple elections because there is no risk of the dead person ever going to jail.


... but you acknowledge the fraud everywhere the fraud occurs, yes?


... and you fully acknowledge all the fraud in those States where it is illegal, yes?


Windows were covered so cheaters could cheat without observers observing.


Of course you recognize the fraud of counting votes beyond the allowed counting period.


It absolutely is fraud. What part of fraud isn't fraud? It would be easier for us to agree that this fraud falls within the DNC's acceptable fraud limit.


You really should have stayed awake in English class.


You don't seem to know what actual election fraud is.
Georgia [cheating collaborators] did a full [preemptive] "audit" and [ignored the massive fraud in which they participated ].

This is what I've been saying. You are a conspiracy theorist and you create conspiracies to rationalize what you want to believe. You have no evidence that Georgia election officials conspired to hide election fraud, just as you had no evidence that the FBI and Inspector General conspired to cover-up what was claimed in the affidavit. It's all made up in your mind.

The conspiracy theorist issue is compounded by the fact that you have terrible news sources and apparently believe information provided by random Youtubers, who have already been caught lying.

You are in a downward spiral that nobody can get you out of, except yourself.
 
That's a great answer to a question that nobody is asking at the moment.


Nope. The question before you is "Do you accept theories of human conspiracy, or do you reject them all?"
As I just said, there are hundreds of thousands of situations where humans conspired.

I've agreed with you repeatedly that people DO conspire.

This is all an attempt at distraction...
 
I've agreed with you repeatedly that people DO conspire.
Meaningless. You haven't answered the question, because you are lying about acknowledging that humans conspire.

You have forfeited until you answer the question.
 
Back
Top