The one question on Iran no leftist can answer. Why 60%

Not one leftist on this board can answer one simple question. Why was Iran enriching uranium to 60%? They squawk and squawk that they weren't at the magical 90% enrichment phase, but they can not or will not explain why they were even at 60%

It is not even disputed that they were at 60%. The UN confirmed it.

It is also irrefutable that if one is using uranium for peaceful energy production purposes one does not need to enrich uranium past 5%. I have read some places maybe up to 20% (but I am no expert)

I have yet to come across any source that can justify enriching uranium to 60% for peaceful reasons. The only reason to enrich to 60% is because it is that much easier to enrich it to 90%.

So until a board leftist can answer this one question reasonably, I will not even take them seriously on this issue. Case closed.
Trump did a sneak attack on their facilities. So they went from 20 to 60, They are sending Trump a message. One you cannot read. Nations with nukes do not get attacked. Iran has shown repeatedly that they are not after a nuke, but Trump's belligerence may force them to do it.
 
Yup, Trump tearing up the JCPOA meant Iran was free to use their discretion to do whatever they wanted. Trump gave Iran back their free choice.

And since the world had seen N.Korea get out from under US rhetoric that they were a constant threat to the entire world and all the drum beat war talk directed at them as the US pushed they must never be allowed to get nukes... and yet as soon as they got nukes that all went away INSTANTLY and N.Korea has not only been mostly left alone now by the rest of the world but Trump, especially, treats them like a model nation citizen, it is became clear to every 'labeled rogue' nation that their path to peace was to have a nuke and without it you were forever at threat of attack or invasion. As Ukraine also learned.
MAGA morons wanted the satisfaction of seeing Trump rip up the 2015 Obama agreement, but then they wanted Iran to keep complying with the conditions of Obama agreement, after Trump declared it null and void 🤣
 
Not one leftist on this board can answer one simple question. Why was Iran enriching uranium to 60%? They squawk and squawk that they weren't at the magical 90% enrichment phase, but they can not or will not explain why they were even at 60%

It is not even disputed that they were at 60%. The UN confirmed it.

It is also irrefutable that if one is using uranium for peaceful energy production purposes one does not need to enrich uranium past 5%. I have read some places maybe up to 20% (but I am no expert)

I have yet to come across any source that can justify enriching uranium to 60% for peaceful reasons. The only reason to enrich to 60% is because it is that much easier to enrich it to 90%.

So until a board leftist can answer this one question reasonably, I will not even take them seriously on this issue. Case closed.
Listen, Iran may be denied the Nuke, but just about every fuckin nation on the planet, including them sand nigga's that attacked up on 9/11 out of Saudi, all are Nuked up and or thinking about it...LOL. The safest nation far far away from Iran's Nukes is the US. And just a FYI, Obama was on the path of seeing to it, that we had mechanism in place to keep Iran in check and that orange bastard who's nuts so many suckle off of, ending the program
 
Not one leftist on this board can answer one simple question. Why was Iran enriching uranium to 60%? They squawk and squawk that they weren't at the magical 90% enrichment phase, but they can not or will not explain why they were even at 60%

It is not even disputed that they were at 60%. The UN confirmed it.

It is also irrefutable that if one is using uranium for peaceful energy production purposes one does not need to enrich uranium past 5%. I have read some places maybe up to 20% (but I am no expert)

I have yet to come across any source that can justify enriching uranium to 60% for peaceful reasons. The only reason to enrich to 60% is because it is that much easier to enrich it to 90%.

So until a board leftist can answer this one question reasonably, I will not even take them seriously on this issue. Case closed.
Another MAGA Iran post that didn’t age well
 
Forget arguing endlessly over whether 60% technically equals “weapons grade.” Why was Iran enriching to 60% while simultaneously frustrating the IAEA's ability to verify what it was doing?


If the answer is that the program was exclusively peaceful, then unrestricted safeguards verification should have been Iran's best evidence. Instead, the inspectors themselves kept reporting problems with access, information, and cooperation.


That's the part everyone seems strangely eager to skip.
 

AI Overview​

"Yes, Iran initially complied with the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) repeatedly verified that Tehran abided by the core nuclear restrictions until the United States withdrew from the accord in 2018 and reimposed economic sanctions."
  • Stockpile reduction: Iran shipped out 98% of its low-enriched uranium stockpile.
  • Centrifuge limits: Tehran cut its operational centrifuges down to 5,060 and placed thousands of others into monitored storage.
  • Enrichment caps: Uranium enrichment was kept at 3.67%, well below the threshold for weapons-grade material.
  • IAEA verification: Regular quarterly reports from the IAEA confirmed Iran met its transparency and inspection commitments.
Now do how many IAEA inspectors got access to Iranian sites, you head-up-the-ass retard!
 
Forget arguing endlessly over whether 60% technically equals “weapons grade.” Why was Iran enriching to 60% while simultaneously frustrating the IAEA's ability to verify what it was doing?


If the answer is that the program was exclusively peaceful, then unrestricted safeguards verification should have been Iran's best evidence. Instead, the inspectors themselves kept reporting problems with access, information, and cooperation.


That's the part everyone seems strangely eager to skip.

Not everyone. Just those with closed minds...
 
Only in your delusional head. :rolleyes2:
When the 2015 agreement was in effect, Iran never enriched uranium beyond what is required for civilian medical and energy purposes.

They only enriched it to 60% after Trump declared the 2015 agreement null and void.

It's really funny that you MAGA morons wanted the satisfaction of seeing Trump rip up an Obama agreement, but then you still wanted Iran to comply with the conditions of the Obama agreement, lol.
 
Now do how many IAEA inspectors got access to Iranian sites, you head-up-the-ass retard!

Did IAEA Inspectors Have Access to Iranian Sites Under the 2015 JCPOA?​

Yes, IAEA inspectors received extensive, routine, and managed access to declared Iranian nuclear sites under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The deal tripled the number of inspectors, permitted continuous surveillance of enrichment facilities, and allowed managed access to undeclared sites through a defined challenge-inspection process, though the U.S. withdrawal in 2018 eventually led to severe restrictions on monitoring in later years.

AI overview​
 
I didn't read the majority of posts here, but did anyone mention the important factor of Iran's
uranium enrichment plan was partially being endorsed and paid for by obama and biden?
 
Not one leftist on this board can answer one simple question. Why was Iran enriching uranium to 60%? They squawk and squawk that they weren't at the magical 90% enrichment phase, but they can not or will not explain why they were even at 60%

It is not even disputed that they were at 60%. The UN confirmed it.

It is also irrefutable that if one is using uranium for peaceful energy production purposes one does not need to enrich uranium past 5%. I have read some places maybe up to 20% (but I am no expert)

I have yet to come across any source that can justify enriching uranium to 60% for peaceful reasons. The only reason to enrich to 60% is because it is that much easier to enrich it to 90%.

So until a board leftist can answer this one question reasonably, I will not even take them seriously on this issue. Case closed.
Because Trump tore up the Iran nuclear deal, they were free to do so.
 
Listen, Iran may be denied the Nuke, but just about every fuckin nation on the planet, including them sand nigga's that attacked up on 9/11 out of Saudi, all are Nuked up and or thinking about it...LOL. The safest nation far far away from Iran's Nukes is the US. And just a FYI, Obama was on the path of seeing to it, that we had mechanism in place to keep Iran in check and that orange bastard who's nuts so many suckle off of, ending the program
Obama was a clown for a President. Biden was worse.

As for who has a nuke and who doesn't? Honestly, I don't give a fiddlers fuck. I think everyone should have one. Personally I don't think it is the United States business who has one or who doesn't. I also don't think we should maintain military bases across the world. Fuck em.

Let other countries protect themselves.

The rule will be simple. Fuck with us and get fucked and that means everything up to and including nukes. Look how they neutered Japan.
 
Looks like my revelations about weapons grade U-235 yesterday incited a sudden flurry of frantic Google research by hapless MAGA morons.

Neocons like you and Teflon Don frantically tried to convince me 22 years ago that Iraq was supposedly building nuclear weapons.
As if you knew anything whatsoever about the subject until you googled it. What a joke of a human.
 
Obama was a clown for a President. Biden was worse.

As for who has a nuke and who doesn't? Honestly, I don't give a fiddlers fuck. I think everyone should have one. Personally I don't think it is the United States business who has one or who doesn't. I also don't think we should maintain military bases across the world. Fuck em.

Let other countries protect themselves.

The rule will be simple. Fuck with us and get fucked and that means everything up to and including nukes. Look how they neutered Japan.
Appears someone ^ doesn’t understand the complications of employing nuclear weapons

Forty years ago Chernobyl occurred and due to wind currents newborns on our West coast were given iodide shots for radiation and the above poster doesn’t give a “fiddlers fuck” about potential proliferation of nukes

Not surprised
 
Appears someone ^ doesn’t understand the complications of employing nuclear weapons

Forty years ago Chernobyl occurred and due to wind currents newborns on our West coast were given iodide shots for radiation and the above poster doesn’t give a “fiddlers fuck” about potential proliferation of nukes

Not surprised
Well, whoever was giving those shots was a fucking moron. You understand nothing about things nuclear and radiation in general. Nukes are bad because they can, and likely will, kill masses of people and cause mass destruction. Humanity will survive a nuclear war but the next one will be fought with bows and arrows, spears, and swords.
 
Obama was a clown for a President. Biden was worse.

As for who has a nuke and who doesn't? Honestly, I don't give a fiddlers fuck. I think everyone should have one. Personally I don't think it is the United States business who has one or who doesn't. I also don't think we should maintain military bases across the world. Fuck em.

Let other countries protect themselves.

The rule will be simple. Fuck with us and get fucked and that means everything up to and including nukes. Look how they neutered Japan.
Fuck with us????? Listen, Trump is such a coward, just about every bad ass anti US leader in the world, he makes a friend out of. Welp, at least they like me, is his speaking point...they may not like my country, but the mf's like me...quote unquote....The US like Russia can get her ass kicked. And unless cowards like you are willing to put on a uniform or better still put your son's and daughters in uniforms, stop making yourselves these bad ass's on other ppl DIMES AND TIME. former Vet talking here....
 
Obama was a clown for a President. Biden was worse.

As for who has a nuke and who doesn't? Honestly, I don't give a fiddlers fuck. I think everyone should have one. Personally I don't think it is the United States business who has one or who doesn't. I also don't think we should maintain military bases across the world. Fuck em.

Let other countries protect themselves.

The rule will be simple. Fuck with us and get fucked and that means everything up to and including nukes. Look how they neutered Japan.
Obama was a clown? That black clown can travel any where in the world and get nothing but agilation and love. Anywhere, even China...Trump on the other hand, until that bitch is dead and gone, can't move a inch without having armor protection and forget about traveling once out of office, the front porches of Maralogo at best. NOBODY HATES TRUMP MORE THAN THE WORLD AND THE US. So who's really the clown, you ass wipe fuck head?
 
Obama was a clown? That black clown can travel any where in the world and get nothing but agilation and love. Anywhere, even China...Trump on the other hand, until that bitch is dead and gone, can't move a inch without having armor protection and forget about traveling once out of office, the front porches of Maralogo at best. NOBODY HATES TRUMP MORE THAN THE WORLD AND THE US. So who's really the clown, you ass wipe fuck head?
Yeah, none of that is true.
 
Back
Top