Lake Ontario is not named after the province

@WinterBorn;


Have the incumbent POTUS's actions, proposals, and initiatives in his first and current terms met with as much, less, or more pushback, including lawfare, compared to other 21st century presidents, comparatively?



More. Donald Trump’s first term (2017–2021) already drew substantially heavier legal, congressional, and institutional pushback than George W. Bush, Barack Obama, or Joe Biden experienced across their full tenures. His current term (2025–present) has produced an even faster volume of lawsuits against executive actions, though with a more favorable Supreme Court and Republican control of Congress.


Lawsuit volume and nationwide injunctions​


Nationwide injunctions (orders blocking a policy everywhere, not just for the plaintiffs) are a useful proxy because they were rare before the 21st century.


  • Bush (8 years): 6–12 nationwide injunctions.
  • Obama (8 years): 12–19. Republican AGs filed about 46 multistate suits; Texas sued roughly 48 times.
  • Biden (4 years): 14–28 nationwide injunctions and 133 multistate lawsuits. Major fights included student-loan forgiveness, vaccine mandates, and energy rules.
  • Trump first term (4 years): 55–86 nationwide injunctions (Harvard Law Review tally: 64 of 127 such injunctions since 1963). Hundreds of challenges overall; California alone filed 123 suits; the ACLU recorded 434 actions. Courts blocked or forced withdrawal of many immigration, census, and regulatory actions. The administration’s success rate on challenged major rules was low (~22–32%).

Trump’s second term has accelerated the pattern. Trackers report 328+ lawsuits in the first few months, 530+ in the first year, and 600–900+ cases by mid-to-late 2026 depending on methodology (NYT, Just Security, Lawfare). Blue-state AGs and groups filed at a higher daily rate than in prior administrations. District courts initially blocked many actions (immigration, birthright citizenship, agency cuts, funding freezes); the Supreme Court later narrowed nationwide injunctions and allowed some policies to proceed.


The partisan pattern of injunctions is also sharper: Democrat-appointed judges issued ~92% of those against first-term Trump policies.


Lawfare and personal legal actions​


Trump is unique among 21st-century presidents in the volume of criminal and civil cases targeting him personally while he was a candidate and former president: New York hush-money/business-records, classified documents, January 6-related federal charges, Georgia election interference, civil fraud, and defamation. Several were dropped, delayed, or resolved after the 2024 election. No prior 21st-century president faced a comparable cluster of contemporaneous criminal prosecutions. Clinton’s impeachment was 20th-century; Bush and Obama faced investigations and congressional probes but not this scale of personal criminal exposure. Critics of those cases call them lawfare; supporters of the prosecutions call them accountability. The distinction is politically contested, but the volume is not.


Trump was also the only 21st-century president impeached (twice). Congressional opposition in the first term included the Mueller investigation and two House impeachments. The current term has a Republican House and Senate, reducing legislative blockage.


Broader context​


Polarization, the rise of state AG litigation as a tool, and heavier use of executive orders by all recent presidents have increased courtroom fights over time. Trump’s first-term agenda (travel ban, wall, DACA rollback, census question) and second-term agenda (immigration enforcement, birthright citizenship, agency restructuring, tariffs, DEI rollback) produced more immediate, high-profile clashes than most Bush or Obama initiatives. Media and protest intensity was exceptionally high in 2017–2021 (“Resistance”); second-term street protests have been less sustained so far, with opposition concentrated in courts and blue-state governments.


In short, measured by lawsuits filed, nationwide injunctions issued, personal criminal cases, and impeachments, Trump’s two terms have met with more—not less or equivalent—pushback than the other 21st-century presidencies. The current term’s higher early-year lawsuit count continues that pattern even as the Supreme Court has become a more reliable backstop than in 2017–2021.



 
Neither did the United States. Native Americans and Native Canadians are called that for a reason.

Another point is that there's no evidence that I am aware of that the people who named the lake prior to European arrival on the continent didn't previously displace other tribes and rename everything in sight.

You'll know this one, @Sailor; what did Istanbul used to be named?
 
Neither did the United States. Native Americans and Native Canadians are called that for a reason.

That's correct. The Iroquoian and Huron-Wendat peoples were not Canadian. They were members of their own Indigenous nations, whose territories were later incorporated into the country now called Canada. Calling them “Canadians” is a misnomer based on modern political geography.
 
That's correct. The Iroquoian and Huron-Wendat peoples were not Canadian. They were members of their own Indigenous nations, whose territories were later incorporated into the country now called Canada. Calling them “Canadians” is a misnomer based on modern political geography.
Paradox. Irrational. Which is it, dude?
 
And he is dealing with them wonderfully.

It doesn't take any significant time to rename a lake, Wimber.

Find out in the next thrilling episode!

Doesn't take any significant time?

Sure, all Trump has to do is make a pronouncement and POOF the name changes magically.

No need to worry about the costs of changing maps, books, signage, or additional things. After all, it isn't Trump's money. It is tax dollars.
 
Doesn't take any significant time?
No.
Sure, all Trump has to do is make a pronouncement and POOF the name changes magically.
That's right.
No need to worry about the costs of changing maps, books, signage, or additional things. After all, it isn't Trump's money. It is tax dollars.
It doesn't cost anything. Maps and navigation charts are reprinted on a regular basis anyway. The entire cycle is about 60 days.
Further, most maps and charts are online can can easily be updated to reflect the change. This is also done on a regular basis. A lot of things change besides a name.

Trump does not have to pay for any book or signage (if any) reflecting the name change. Private investors do that (the one that put up the sign or wrote the book).
 
Back
Top