A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.

Hawkeye10 said:
No......the protocol was to put people on vents early....which the doctors had no choice but to comply with....and almost everyone died.
Click to expand...

They would have died anyways, Cretin.

Bear in mind that SARS-COV-2 was a NOVEL virus, new to science and the medical field. Yes, some early treatments turned out not to be necessary or effective. However, IT WAS THE VIRUS THAT KILLED. It was not murder. Not unless you're willing to state definitively that all COVID deaths in the U.S. were Trump's fault, a statement just as false as your others.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
They would have died anyways, Cretin.

Bear in mind that SARS-COV-2 was a NOVEL virus, new to science and the medical field. Yes, some early treatments turned out not to be necessary or effective. However, IT WAS THE VIRUS THAT KILLED. It was not murder. Not unless you're willing to state definitively that all COVID deaths in the U.S. were Trump's fault, a statement just as false as your others.
Click to expand...
They knew in a week that vents were a bad idea.....it took two months for the mandate to end.
 
Stone said:
Umm,...right above you I posted my feelings about the male in question in Christies post. He would be a total loser,....like I myself said he would be. Why lie about me when the post is right there for all to see? That's kind of stupid of you don't you think?
Click to expand...
Well, in my opinion ANYONE who is not actively and forcefully protesting against Trump...frequently and publicly...is supporting him. YOU, Stone, are (and have been) supporting him. So I take this bullshit above to be a mealy-mouth rationalization of some sort.

As for "stupid"...I consider it stupid to suppose anyone thinks you to be someone who sees Trump as a "total loser" or as someone "broke."
 
Ross Dolan said:
Well, in my opinion ANYONE who is not actively and forcefully protesting against Trump...frequently and publicly...is supporting him. YOU, Stone, are (and have been) supporting him. So I take this bullshit above to be a mealy-mouth rationalization of some sort.

As for "stupid"...I consider it stupid to suppose anyone thinks you to be someone who sees Trump as a "total loser" or as someone "broke."
Click to expand...
Well....You turned out right about Trump.

+ 1 2 U.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
They knew in a week that vents were a bad idea.....it took two months for the mandate to end.
Click to expand...

You don't know that nor have you provided a shred of credible evidence for this b.s. Stick to stuff you're better at, like Israel plotting 9/11 and blaming it on the Saudis.
 
Jarod said:
So you don’t know why you hate her either. Typical.
Click to expand...

Just as you don't know why you hate TWUMP - just that the hive programs you to.

We have laid out details and specific facts to why we oppose the toxic philosophy that Steinem promoted. She degraded women and did massive damage to American culture.
 
cawacko said:
Equal rights originally meant under the law. They were trying to remove legal discriminations. Now it has expanded to anything Gloria Steinem believed.
Click to expand...
Uh, no. I’m sure plenty of people do not agree with her 100%. Likely most. What do you disagree w her about?
 
Jarod said:
What is it that we promote?
Click to expand...

  • Open borders
  • Ending the U.S. Constitution and creation of a global government
  • Authoritarianism to enforce compliance to party edicts
  • A police state such as the one Biden created in 2021 - without the need for Covid as an excuse for it
  • One party rule such as that found in Communist China and California
  • Destruction of Israel and genocide of the Jews living there
  • "Abortion" of children up to the age of 6 (The Lindsay law)
  • Reeducation and forced labor camps for enemies of the party
Just a few of the things you and your party promote.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Just as you don't know why you hate TWUMP - just that the hive programs you to.

We have laid out details and specific facts to why we oppose the toxic philosophy that Steinem promoted. She degraded women and did massive damage to American culture.
Click to expand...
You have not tied your feelings about her to facts.
 
Jarod said:
Example of something you disagree with her about?
Click to expand...
Let’s draw on that liberal arts education we were discussing as well as critical thinking.

Feminism started out as fighting for equal rights under the law. Then it expanded into much more, and Steinem was a leader of that.

Your original statement said she simply wanted equal rights.

You are trying to redefine what she stood for in a way to try and paint it as being unassailable.

And you are avoiding that by trying to pivot to whether I agree or disagree with her on any particular issue, which has nothing to do with this discussion.
 
cawacko said:
Let’s draw on that liberal arts education we were discussing as well as critical thinking.

Feminism started out as fighting for equal rights under the law. Then it expanded into much more, and Steinem was a leader of that.

Your original statement said she simply wanted equal rights.

You are trying to redefine what she stood for in a way to try and paint it as being unassailable.

And you are avoiding that by trying to pivot to whether I agree or disagree with her on any particular issue, which has nothing to do with this discussion.
Click to expand...
I’m simply asking for anyone to produce a single thing they disagree with her about, and back up that she believed it.

Yes she advocated for more than changes in the law, but changes in how society saw and treated women. Nothing wrong with that.
 
Jarod said:
I’m simply asking for anyone to produce a single thing they disagree with her about, and back up that she believed it.

Yes she advocated for more than changes in the law, but changes in how society saw and treated women. Nothing wrong with that.
Click to expand...
You keep changing your position. This whole discussion started after you said she simply wanted equal rights under the law. Now you say she advocated for more than changes in the law.

No one is saying she's not entitled to her opinion or beliefs. But you were trying to frame it as anyone being against anything she believed as being against equal rights.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top