ModernDiogenes
Well-known member
Link: https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explai...ing-provisions-in-the-one-big-beautiful-bill/
You’re totally bizarre and way, way, out there. I mean out of touch with reality.
-30-
Predictions for the 2026 Midterms
- Thread starter Uncensored2008
- Start date
Link: https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explai...ing-provisions-in-the-one-big-beautiful-bill/
You’re totally bizarre and way, way, out there. I mean out of touch with reality.
-30-
ModernDiogenes
Well-known member
Either you’re a sock puppet for Uncensored or there are two of you totally disconnected soils running around. Scary thought.
The link is there in the post above for anyone interested.
-30-
Talk about bizzare, your link shows all the provisions sunsetting.
SALT - the only one that harms "the rich" as your party calls them - is the last to go. Blue states don't get to start shifting the majority of taxes back on red states until 2030.
So why did you lie that the tax cuts were "for the rich?" Just reciting talking points from MSNBC? I've corrected you on it before. These tax cuts support the middle class - which is why your party is so against them. Destruction of the middle class, the bourgeoisie, has always been the priority of collectivist totalitarians.
Conservatives want to help the middle class. You want to hurt us, to eradicate the middle class. A strong middle class will never accept or adopt socialism.
ITN is not correct, unless extended they will indeed expire.
The lie YOU told is that some fictional "tax cuts for the rich" don't have a sunset clause. You know that was a lie when you posted it, as I've corrected you before, yet you chose to lie anyway - because as a Marxist, you hold the goal of socialism as too important to converse in an ethical manner.
96% of the Trump tax cut dollars allowed households earning less than $200K to keep more of their money. Yet you blatantly lied that the while the middle class cuts will expire if congress fails to take action (true) fictional "tax cuts for the rich" are permanent (flat out lie.)
I didn't and don't dispute that the best parts of the cuts, overtime and tips, will expire if democrats block extending them - which if they have the power, they will as democrats always fuck working people under. I called you out for the lie about some sort of "permanent cuts for the rich." There are no such cuts, as you full well know. You're just using Marxist class warfare, despite knowing that your claims are false.
ModernDiogenes
Well-known member
Take it up with the budget lab at Yale University.
No idea what you think these graphs represent?
Income of greater than $5K? Per year?
Fact - 96% of the impact of the BBB affects households making less than $200K per year.
Why do you oppose the middle class being able to keep more of what they earn? This alone destroys your claim of being a "fiscal conservative."
When you look off in the distance to the right, and see Mao smiling back at you, you're NOT a conservative.
