Saxony-Anhalt, Germany State election 2026 (Landtagswahl in Sachsen-Anhalt) — Live Results

Guno צְבִי said:
If they get too far out of line the world can make Germany rubble and dresden like again, scratch a right-wing a kraut get a barbarian savage
Click to expand...

Sure you will, Achmed.

But then you've been threatening to obliterate Israel and kill all the Jews there for 70 years, and haven't done too well... So not sure your threat holds a lot of weight.
 
Moosakofsky said:
I don’t know how you can’t understand that. What do you think he meant and I’ll correct you if you somehow don’t get it right.
Click to expand...
Björn Höcke referred to Berlin’s Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe (the Holocaust memorial) as a “monument of shame” (“Denkmal der Schande”).
In a January 17, 2017 speech to the AfD’s youth organization (Junge Alternative) in Dresden, the AfD politician and Thuringia state leader said: “We Germans—that is, our people—are the only people in the world who have planted a monument of shame in the heart of their capital.” He linked this to broader criticism of Germany’s postwar “remembrance culture” (Erinnerungskultur), calling the focus on Nazi crimes a “stupid/laughable policy of coming to terms with the past” that “cripples” the country, leaves Germans with the “mentality of a totally defeated people,” and makes German history look “rotten and ridiculous.” He demanded a “180-degree turnaround in the politics of remembrance,” arguing for more emphasis on German achievements, inventors, philosophers, and victims rather than primarily on Nazi crimes and atonement.
The phrase is ambiguous in German: it can mean a memorial to a shame (the Holocaust as a national shame) or a shameful/disgraceful monument itself. Höcke later claimed in a personal statement that he meant the former—that he was calling the Holocaust itself a shame for the German people and that the memorial commemorated that—and expressed surprise at the reaction. Critics across the political spectrum, Jewish organizations (including the Central Council of Jews in Germany), and some within the AfD rejected this as disingenuous or insufficient, viewing the remark (in context of the full speech) as an attack on Germany’s established culture of acknowledging Nazi crimes, relativizing the Holocaust, and promoting historical revisionism or whitewashing. The speech triggered widespread condemnation, calls for his expulsion from the AfD (which ultimately failed), and later artistic protests, such as a replica of the memorial erected near his home.
This fits Höcke’s longer pattern of challenging mainstream German historical memory of the Nazi era, which he and his supporters frame as excessive self-flagellation that undermines national pride and identity. Mainstream German politics and society have treated the Holocaust memorial and the broader duty of remembrance as foundational to the postwar democratic consensus.
 
AProudLefty said:
Björn Höcke referred to Berlin’s Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe (the Holocaust memorial) as a “monument of shame” (“Denkmal der Schande”).
In a January 17, 2017 speech to the AfD’s youth organization (Junge Alternative) in Dresden, the AfD politician and Thuringia state leader said: “We Germans—that is, our people—are the only people in the world who have planted a monument of shame in the heart of their capital.” He linked this to broader criticism of Germany’s postwar “remembrance culture” (Erinnerungskultur), calling the focus on Nazi crimes a “stupid/laughable policy of coming to terms with the past” that “cripples” the country, leaves Germans with the “mentality of a totally defeated people,” and makes German history look “rotten and ridiculous.” He demanded a “180-degree turnaround in the politics of remembrance,” arguing for more emphasis on German achievements, inventors, philosophers, and victims rather than primarily on Nazi crimes and atonement.
The phrase is ambiguous in German: it can mean a memorial to a shame (the Holocaust as a national shame) or a shameful/disgraceful monument itself. Höcke later claimed in a personal statement that he meant the former—that he was calling the Holocaust itself a shame for the German people and that the memorial commemorated that—and expressed surprise at the reaction. Critics across the political spectrum, Jewish organizations (including the Central Council of Jews in Germany), and some within the AfD rejected this as disingenuous or insufficient, viewing the remark (in context of the full speech) as an attack on Germany’s established culture of acknowledging Nazi crimes, relativizing the Holocaust, and promoting historical revisionism or whitewashing. The speech triggered widespread condemnation, calls for his expulsion from the AfD (which ultimately failed), and later artistic protests, such as a replica of the memorial erected near his home.
This fits Höcke’s longer pattern of challenging mainstream German historical memory of the Nazi era, which he and his supporters frame as excessive self-flagellation that undermines national pride and identity. Mainstream German politics and society have treated the Holocaust memorial and the broader duty of remembrance as foundational to the postwar democratic consensus.
Click to expand...
Okay, so you know how to copy and paste.
Again, What do you think he meant and I’ll correct you if you somehow don’t get it right.
 
Kurmugeon said:
How is the afD doing in the other areas of Germany?



-
Click to expand...
Very well in the old East. Very different in the old West.

State
Current AfD support
Position
Saxony-Anhalt
~44% in today’s election
1st
Saxony
~42%
1st
Thuringia
~40%
1st
Brandenburg
~37%
1st
Mecklenburg–Western Pomerania
~36–37%
1st
 





Brian Berletic

@BrianJBerletic


🇺🇸🇩🇪 A Word of Warning: "Alternative for Germany" (AfD) is nothing more than MAGA with a side of sauerkraut.Just like Giorgia Meloni in Italy was simply MAGA with some tomato sauce on top, or Nigel Farage & "Reform UK" MAGA with a spot of tea.Same trick, repeated over and over again - the illusion of hope and change, fallen for over and over again.In the wake of their eventual popularity and victories here and there, what emerges is a bait and switch back to continuity of agenda. Follow the money and find nothing about any of these parties separates them from the actual material reality driving their respective nations' problems, and in particular, the massive corporate-financier interests that run the US and all its proxies, including Germany, Italy, and the UK.Until a party emerges that is actually backed by a truly alternative center of power, nothing else will change except the lies told to gullible voters before elections & the excuses afterwards when nothing actually changes.
 
Before you dismiss out of hand what Brian says he has gathered a lot of evidence for his continuity of agenda theory.....he has been right a lot on various subjects.
 
Guno צְבִי said:
Nazi-Era Language: Individual AfD figures have faced heavy criticism for using terminology or rhetoric echoing the Nazi era. For example, senior politician Björn Höcke criticized Berlin's Holocaust memorial as a "monument of shame," and other members have used banned nationalist slogans or phrases.

Symbolic Timing and Pushback: Critics have pointed out provocative coincidences, such as national party events coinciding with historical anniversaries tied to Hitler's consolidation of power, which the party routinely dismisses as artificial controve.

Domestic intelligence services in Germany monitor parts of the AfD, classifying state chapters or the national party structure with varying degrees of extremist categorization. Investigations have highlighted connections between certain regional candidates and former neo-Nazi networks.
Click to expand...


https://twitter.com/x/status/2096673854550630876
View: https://x.com/boot15_vu/status/2096673854550630876?s=20
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top