Oklahoma Bible mandate challenged in Court

If you and virtually no one else on this board consistently practices the Golden Rule, then there is no way can it be a scientific law of nature everyone just naturally practices.

But it can be an ideal toward which our species strives. Which is why it arose independently across civilizations and across all time. Literally every society has had a formulation of the Golden Rule.







But I'm sure in your imagination it's because Invisible God Man BEAMED it into our minds! OR it could be a drive understood by social animals as part of that whole reciprocity thing you seem to hold in such disregard (unless it's magical mystical God-Reciprocity that comes from invisible skydaddy)
 
But it can be an ideal toward which our species strives. Which is why it arose independently across civilizations and across all time. Literally every society has had a formulation of the Golden Rule.







But I'm sure in your imagination it's because Invisible God Man BEAMED it into our minds! OR it could be a drive understood by social animals as part of that whole reciprocity thing you seem to hold in such disregard (unless it's magical mystical God-Reciprocity that comes from invisible skydaddy)
Nazis hate humanity and invert or destroy everything beneficial.

and they poison the food, and the drugs, and cause war through any means necessary.

really quite distasteful.
 
Cypress is a Creationist apparently and he doesn't believe in evolution. Since HE can't imagine wanting to help a stranger he assumes EVERYONE is thus hampered. The only reason he would help a stranger is because God told him to.
the thing is, god has told him to already.

he doesn't listen.
 
German law allowed for the liquidation of the disabled and mentally handicapped.
Germany was a dictatorship at the time.
Russian law allows for the unprovoked attack on Ukrainians.
Not a law.
African social custom allows for the genital mutilation of girls.
Not a law.
Until recently, American law allowed for the discrimination and oppression of anyone of African heritage.
Recently? I don't think 161 years ago is not recent, Cyborg.
 
Give me a break.
Do you think you need one?
You do not restrain yourself from murdering, raping, stealing because you are thinking about how you can "stabilize society."

You restrain yourself because you have an internal moral compass that makes a distinction between absolute objective right and wrong and which tells you what you ought to do.
Not objective. There is no way to measure 'right' and 'wrong'. There are subjective words.
There is law, and there is breaking the law. That's about as objective as you can get.
There is no scientific Darwinian evolutionary benefit to sacrificing your resources to help competitors, rivals, strangers, the infirm, the disabled. Many human societies have practiced a 'might makes right' cultural ethos, and in their opinion it benefited their societies.
The Theory of Evolution was not created by Darwin.
The Theory of Evolution is not a theory of science.
You just justified a mobster again.
 
It is not just a convention anymore than bipedal locomotion is a "convention". It is built into social animals.
No, it is built into SOME animals. It is also built into Man.
Even ANTS have "proper behavior" modes.
Not by choice. They are programmed that way. They will also kill without question, even sacrificing themselves to save the nest.
Social animals across the spectrum have "rules" which ensure that social group is stable.
It often isn't stable.
Yellow jackets, for example, completely die off in winter. The only survivors are the new queens, which bury themselves in the ground. On emergence, they will not build a nest where yellow jackets have been before.

Some bees do this as well.
And, again, for the zillionth time there IS NOT OBJECTIVE MORALITY.
I don't think you can describe what 'moral' is at all. You don't know the meaning of the word. It is not an objective word.
I honestly don't know how to dumb it down sufficiently for you. I've explained it about a billion times to you how it works and why.
What you described doesn't work.
The fact that you DENY BIOLOGY is only a problem for you.
He doesn't. He acknowledges there is such a thing as biology. I don't think you know the meaning of this word either.
And we as the rest of the world can support the work of Ukraine to STOP that.
So you want to join the Russo-Ukraine war and kill people.
We can and have taken action AGAINST Russia (except for your president Trump who likes Putin)
Having another schizophrenic episode? You are only one person.
What action have you taken? Have you gone out to kill Russians?

Trump is not a Democrat, Murphy.
Unless you want to exist. If that's the case then electrons are quarks are EXTREMELY valuable.
Electrons are not quarks.
 
And AMERICAN LAW SUPPORTED BY THE VARIOUS CHURCHES IN THE SOUTH MADE SLAVERY LEGAL.
What 'various churches in the south'??
What 'American law'?

Slavery was legal in the United States even before it's founding. It continued legally until 1865. Slavery was considered normal practice in most societies.

So what was it about CHRISTIANITY that allowed them to believe Slavery was a virtue?????
You really should read the Bible some time. It talks about how you should treat your slaves.
You yourself are a slave. You will die just like everyone else. You cannot escape your bondage.
 
I knew you would eventually start retreating and moonwalking backwards away from moral relativism, and try in some convoluted way to prove you believe in objective morality.
There is no such thing as 'objective morality' or 'relative morality'. Go learn what 'moral' means. Morality is not a number.
 
But it can be an ideal toward which our species strives. Which is why it arose independently across civilizations and across all time. Literally every society has had a formulation of the Golden Rule.
It's a religious value in eastern and western traditions, based in the belief that all humans have innate value.
It's not a scientific Darwinian law of nature.

You're free to co-opt a religious value and strip it out of it's religious context, but don't try to claim that the consistent practice of the Golden Rule is a scientific law of nature.

You never consistently follow the Golden Rule on this board. Many of your posts are dripping with insult, depreciation, disparagement.
As long as you can act with anonymity and know you can get away with it you do not strive for the Golden Rule. That should tell you the Golden Rule is not a scientific law of nature
 
The law of the jungle is not equivalent to proper human moral conscience.
Ants are not a jungle.
Ants are designed to propagate their genetic information by maintaining and protecting the queen.

They are not sacrificing their resources to help competitor ants and non-kin groups of ants.

Ants have no abstract concept of beneficence or justice.
Now you say you know what an ant thinks??
There is no scientific Darwinian evolutionary benefit to sacrificing your tribe's resources to help competitors, rivals, strangers, the terminally diseased and disabled. That requires a moral conscience.
Buzzword fallacies. Magick words (science, Darwin, evolutionary, competitor, rival, stranger, moral, conscience).
Try English. It works better.
 
If we are nothing except collections of quarks and electrons, it is delusional to claim every human life has inherent and innate value. You're lying to yourself.
I wonder if he would claim Jeffery Dahmer has an inherent and innate value to society. You remember him, the cannibal that refrigerated his meals.
You can claim it is your opinion that your life has innate value. But that doesn't change the fact you are only a finite collection of subatomic particles.

In your worldview of moral relativism, there is nothing objectively wrong for the Nazis to decide their sociey would benefit from the liquidation of inferior life forms like you, the physically disabled, and the mentally retarded.

It's only your opinion that it's wrong.
There is no such thing as 'relative morals'. Morals is not a number.
 
Golden rule is a religious moral concept, not a scientific Darwinian concept.

Hardly anyone on this board practices the Golden Rule. You can't be on this board for 30 minutes without being insulted, demeaned, threatened.

That right there tells you the Golden Rule is something we naturally resist. It's not a principle of science we naturally practice.
Even if our conscience tells us it's what we ought to do.
Buzzword fallacy. Magic words (science, Darwin, concept).
 
Back
Top