The caveman cannot be impressed by the tricorder he cannot use; he can only be frustrated. You don't have the tools to understand ideas at my level.
You have no knowledge of me. I have little of you. The difference is I know it and work within the restrictions that places on an exchange of the type you decided, and it was you that decided this, to take it.
That I know I have an I.Q. measured at 147, that I’ve survived 40 years of high pressure, high stakes, high risk policing on my wits … none of that is important to me for you to know, or be believed by you if you did know. It’s only important that *I* know and that the few I care about believing it belive it and in me. What you think about it means nothing to me. That’s not an insult. It should mean nothing, just as what I think about you should mean nothing to you. And if you cared to know I don’t think anything of you. I don’t waste time on that which has zero impact on me - again, same rule, mine has zero impact on you as well)
I know what your behavior indicates and what it indicates is that you have a need to be perceived as right here. I don’t care to be perceived as anything in this, right or wrong. I present ideas and the readers make determinations and I’m fine with wherever they land as long as I’m speaking truths. It’s truth I care about, not how those truths are perceived.
So you, or others, will say whatever you say and I’ll speak truth to it. It will back up those speaking truth or deny those telling less than truths. Where it lands, it lands. All that matters to me is I know I’m doing my best to be truthful. When/if I find out I’m wrong I acknowledge it, thank the individual for new knowledge, and move on. Keeping to true North on the truth parade. The best you can do with someone like me is mirror it. Kept to truth yourself. Not slinging this ideology (badly based ideology as it’s not backed by facts).
You keep to speaking MAGA bull crap, I’ll keep pointing to the public record (where truths reside-by peer reviewed reporting) and you won’t fare well long term, and you seem to care about that.
Learn how discussion works and get back to me. When you make a stupid assertion, I am not somehow obligated to formulate a counterargument. It is sufficient to illuminate the stupidity of your assertion. When you blather "Qi-qi-Thhhh-ptaspa", I do not have to provide a better option.
You (and uncensored) should if you are speaking not to me but the assembled who are watching and determining. I’m not speaking to either of you, as I determined you are a lost cause with a closed mind, about three exchanges into our thrust and parry. I’m speaking to the assembled who might be following along, and I don’t presume the majority are, but for those few I make a case that they can think on and come to their own conclusions. Again, I’m fine with whatever that might be.
I already have your complete attention. You obsess over my every word.
You’re a foil at this point. Nothing more. Not because I lack empathy for you as a human being. Again, it’s because I recognize a closed mind when I witness one so a foil is all you can be to me. When you respond you provide a point of contrast the readers can compare what I’m saying to. They make their determination on that contrast. Again, I trust and am fine with whatever they decide in that.
You have a good Sunday (and I mean that).
