A little education for our Maga/Alt-Right friends.

[Taichiliberal]

Post #23. Since then, IBDaMan couldn't handle getting humiliated by me, and has lost his mind, giggling with the joker in his mirror at his "cleverness" as he post ad nausea. Since I'm no longer reading his drivel, I'll ignore him for a month or so. That should clear up the threads.

 

[Into the Night]

Link

You need a link to the National Archives, stooge??

 

[Into the Night]

What are you gonna do, evince? Look at some facts, and acknowledge them, for the first time in 20 years?

He doesn't know how to look at the National Archives.

 

[Taichiliberal]

You have yet to "whoop my ass" at anything.

Whup - a neoligism signifying either a severe beating or a severe loss in sports or debate.

Whoop - label of a battle cry or the cry of a bird.

Rusty is just another maga/alt-right clod with no intellectual honesty but a lot of insipid pride. He easily slips into troll mode instead of admitting error. I leave him to it.

 

[Into the Night]

Here’s your problem loser



I have turned out to be correct over and over in the decades I have been on this site

You MAGAs?

Not so much

Lie.
MAGAs is not a person, Stooge.
Assumption of victory fallacy.
Void argument fallacy.

 

[Taichiliberal]

For the readers: posts #205 & 307 put an end the incessant maga troll squawking of IntoTheNight for me. Now I live ihs he's for free, as one can see in the thread. Pathetic. I'll check in on him in a month or so.

 

[Into the Night]

Post #23. Since then, IBDaMan couldn't handle getting humiliated by me, and has lost his mind, giggling with the joker in his mirror at his "cleverness" as he post ad nausea. Since I'm no longer reading his drivel, I'll ignore him for a month or so. That should clear up the threads.

Assumption of victory fallacy.
Mantra 1d.
Bulverism.

Lame.

Try presenting an argument, Libby .

 

[Guno צְבִי]

Whup - a neoligism signifying either a severe beating or a severe loss in sports or debate.

Whoop - label of a battle cry or the cry of a bird.

Rusty is just another maga/alt-right clod with no intellectual honesty but a lot of insipid pride. He easily slips into troll mode instead of admitting error. I leave him to it.

Arby is really borderline retarded, forget anything about intellect

 

[Into the Night]

Whup - a neoligism signifying either a severe beating or a severe loss in sports or debate.

Whoop - label of a battle cry or the cry of a bird.

Rusty is just another maga/alt-right clod with no intellectual honesty but a lot of insipid pride. He easily slips into troll mode instead of admitting error. I leave him to it.

Word games. Buzzword fallacies. Magick Words (battle cry, maga, alt-right, intellect, honesty, insipid, troll, mode, error).
Void argument fallacy.
Assumption of victory fallacy.

Try presenting an argument, Libby.

 

[Into the Night]

For the readers: posts #205 & 307 put an end the incessant maga troll squawking of IntoTheNight for me. Now I live ihs he's for free, as one can see in the thread. Pathetic. I'll check in on him in a month or so.

Whining. Bulverism fallacy.

Try presenting an argument, Libby.

 

[Into the Night]

Arby is really borderline retarded, forget anything about intellect

Mantra 1a. Lame. Buzzword fallacies. Magick Words (borderline, retarded, intellect).

 

[WCM]

What BS?

FOX is owned and operated by leftists.
MSNBC is owned and operated by leftists.

Holy Hannah, ITT, take a breath.

1. The Murdoch family has the largest share of ownership at Fox. They are not leftists.
2. MSNBC is a bunch of frothy-mouthed left4rd spazzes regardless of who owns them
3. MSNBC uses the same false narratives as every other alt-left news channel, only they're snottier and with less professionalism, which isn't an easy bar to slither under.

Iran has already lost. Why would the US surrender to them?

I said "would have surrendered...". Get the verb tense correct.

IOW: "If MSNBC's news was accurate from the start, then the US would have capitulated by now, because Iran was allegedly winning so decisively". Do you understand what that meant now?

I don't give a shit about MSNBC.

You should, because they have a megaphone in your country.

You really should go learn what 'real' and 'reality' mean and how they are defined. There is no 'absolute reality'.

OMG, what the F is your problem?
"Based in reality" is defined thusly by AI Overview:

• AI Overview:
• The phrase "based in reality" means things that rely on true facts, real science, or actual events instead of imagination.

I used it exactly, 100% correctly.

 

[cawacko]

I saw the length and was intrigued, but it turned out to be an elaboration of your earlier posts.

We've done this dance Wack, and it's the same outcome. You're just stubbornly insisting on something that does not overshadow, diminish or usurp the OP or my responses to you. I'm done here, and will leave the chronology of the posts for the readers to judge. POSTS # 9, 16, 90. 96, 203, 110, 125, 127, 136.

Here's a question for you if you follow the YIMBY movement. What are your thoughts on the intersection of YIMBYism and race? I've heard a couple of almost competing arguments but curious what you think.

 

[WCM]

I saw the length and was intrigued, but it turned out to be an elaboration of your earlier posts.

We've done this dance Wack, and it's the same outcome. You're just stubbornly insisting on something that does not overshadow, diminish or usurp the OP or my responses to you. I'm done here, and will leave the chronology of the posts for the readers to judge. POSTS # 9, 16, 90. 96, 203, 110, 125, 127, 136.

Your OP was junk. I already pointed that out and you had no rebuttal.
It was a Demonrat president who started it, and it was a location/condition-based decision which affected coloured people, poor white people and European immigrants equally.

 

[Into the Night]

Holy Hannah, ITT, take a breath.

1. The Murdoch family has the largest share of ownership at Fox. They are not leftists.

He is a leftist, dude.

1. MSNBC is a bunch of frothy-mouthed left4rd spazzes regardless of who owns them
2. MSNBC uses the same false narratives as every other alt-left news channel, only they're snottier and with less professionalism, which isn't an easy bar to slither under.

There is no MSNBC. It is owned by Comcast and other leftist corporations.

I said "would have surrendered...". Get the verb tense correct.

Iran has already lost. Why would the US surrender to them?

IOW: "If MSNBC's news was accurate from the start, then the US would have capitulated by now, because Iran was allegedly winning so decisively". Do you understand what that meant now?

There is no MSNBC. Iran has already lost.

You should, because they have a megaphone in your country.

Irrelevance fallacy.

OMG, what the F is your problem?

I have no problem.

"Based in reality" is defined thusly by AI Overview:

Go learn what 'real' and 'reality' mean.

• AI Overview:
• The phrase "based in reality" means things that rely on true facts, real science, or actual events instead of imagination.

True Scotsman fallacy. Circular definition fallacy. Go learn what 'reality', 'fact', 'real' and 'science' means. Buzzword fallacies.

I used it exactly, 100% correctly.

Buzzwords are meaningless. There is no correct use for them.

 

[WCM]

He is a leftist, dude.

There is no MSNBC. It is owned by Comcast and other leftist corporations.

Iran has already lost. Why would the US surrender to them?

There is no MSNBC. Iran has already lost.

Irrelevance fallacy.

I have no problem.

Go learn what 'real' and 'reality' mean.

True Scotsman fallacy. Circular definition fallacy. Go learn what 'reality', 'fact', 'real' and 'science' means. Buzzword fallacies.


Buzzwords are meaningless. There is no correct use for them.

Fake Fallacy Syndrome. Holy fkn snapperheads, Batman.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Arby is really borderline retarded, forget anything about intellect

If he, like his brethren, were truly stupid I could understand and not be so hard on them. But these are bigoted, racist, willfully ignorant pride ridden maga mooks/alt-right jokers .... and this is an anonymous format. So like their Cheeto Jeezus, they don't ever have to admit error or concede a point. I just have a guilty pleasure in taking them to task. There are VERY few people on this site over the years that truly debate. It is what it is.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Your OP was junk. I already pointed that out and you had no rebuttal.
It was a Demonrat president who started it, and it was a location/condition-based decision which affected coloured people, poor white people and European immigrants equally.

Responses per your sentences:

1. Prove it with facts from valid sources and documentation.
2. Then it should be easy to link that post or give it's number .... if you can't or won't, then you're lying.
3. You should pay attention, as the OP was about systemic (look up the definition) racism and did NOT blame any one political party. If you can prove otherwise with quotes, please do. If not, then you're lying again. And if you can historically prove that red lining and the bias in the GI bill EQUALLY affected poor white folk and European immigrants, then do so. If not, then you're guilty of revisionist rhetoric.

 

[Matt Dillon]

If he, like his brethren, were truly stupid I could understand and not be so hard on them. But these are bigoted, racist, willfully ignorant pride ridden maga mooks/alt-right jokers .... and this is an anonymous format. So like their Cheeto Jeezus, they don't ever have to admit error or concede a point. I just have a guilty pleasure in taking them to task. There are VERY few people on this site over the years that truly debate. It is what it is.

Oh pwease lay some more of that edumacation on us, you fucking retard!
Seriously, this is one of the bullshittest threads ever, and I am not going to let you live that down.
You fucking dumbass! You wanted it!

 

[Taichiliberal]

Oh pwease lay some more of that edumacation on us, you fucking retard!
Seriously, this is one of the bullshittest threads ever, and I am not going to let you live that down.
You fucking dumbass! You wanted it!

Matty lashes out in a drunken rage because what I said hit him where he lives.
He, like his maga/alt-right influencers and politicos, make a confession of their own mindsets and actions with each accusation.
Pity he can't logically or factually debunk the OP .... hence his frustration. Now let's watch him just pull the usual revisionist, false rhetoric along with ad hominem (his ilk's favorite accusation).

Laugh, clown, laugh.