And my world view is what? That I am a marxist? Seriously, raise the level of your debate.I didn't say any of that. I'm just saying that you have created your own definition for moral to fit your worldview.
And my world view is what? That I am a marxist? Seriously, raise the level of your debate.I didn't say any of that. I'm just saying that you have created your own definition for moral to fit your worldview.
I admit that was but I couldnt resist. I see ya smilingnow you're trolling
Do marxist think rape could possibly be a moral good?And my world view is what? That I am a marxist? Seriously, raise the level of your debate.
you're a fucking idiotI admit that was but I couldnt resist. I see ya smiling
C'mon man! I admitted it.you're a fucking idiot
You are a pretty typical leftist. You're the kind of person who, as you've shown, won't criticize other cultures for things like FGM, or forcing women to live in burlap bags or treating women like property. Moral relativism is just another arm of that liberal/leftist worldview.And my world view is what? That I am a marxist? Seriously, raise the level of your debate.
I do not give a shit about other cultures. Nor have I ever on this thread stated it as my pursposeYou are a pretty typical leftist. You're the kind of person who, as you've shown, won't criticize other cultures for things like FGM, or forcing women to live in burlap bags or treating women like property. Moral relativism is just another arm of that liberal/leftist worldview.
I tried to have a discussion about philosophy. Clearly you cannot do it.You are a pretty typical leftist. You're the kind of person who, as you've shown, won't criticize other cultures for things like FGM, or forcing women to live in burlap bags or treating women like property. Moral relativism is just another arm of that liberal/leftist worldview.
Moral relativism is as old as Aristotle and Hume to contemporary logic.Moral relativism is just another arm of that liberal/leftist worldview.
"Moral pragmatism as an alternative, which treats morality as a tool for solving specific problems, thus making morality situational instead of universal, practical instead of sacred.You are a pretty typical leftist. You're the kind of person who, as you've shown, won't criticize other cultures for things like FGM, or forcing women to live in burlap bags or treating women like property. Moral relativism is just another arm of that liberal/leftist worldview.
What relativism isYou are a pretty typical leftist. You're the kind of person who, as you've shown, won't criticize other cultures for things like FGM, or forcing women to live in burlap bags or treating women like property. Moral relativism is just another arm of that liberal/leftist worldview.
Bad idea, even old ones, are still bad ideas.Moral relativism is as old as Aristotle and Hume to contemporary logic.
You disagree. But do not use ad hominems.Bad idea, even old ones, are still bad ideas.
Right. Another way that you ignore what moral/morality is truly related to. You've redefined morality to mean something like a tool. That's not what morality is."Moral pragmatism as an alternative, which treats morality as a tool for solving specific problems, thus making morality situational instead of universal, practical instead of sacred.
Moral Believer or Moral Problem-Solver? Moral Pragmatism Fosters Tolerance Without Impeding Moral Behavior - PMC
Many previous studies in moral psychology have described people as moral believers, who treat morality as universal sacred beliefs and show moral outrage and social exclusion toward people with different opinions. At the same time, moral relativism ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Bingo like socialismBad idea, even old ones, are still bad ideas.
Like post #724You disagree. But do not use ad hominems.
"Gilbert Harman, for example, argues that morality is relative to an agreement made among a particular group of people to behave in a particular way. So “moral right and wrong (good and bad, justice and injustice, virtue and vice, etc.) are always relative to a choice of moral framework. What is morally right in relation to one moral framework can be morally wrong in relation to a different moral framework.Bad idea, even old ones, are still bad ideas.
I was not addressing you.Like
Like post #724
"you're a fucking idiot"
The problem is in order for hume to be intellectually consistent he/she/it cant says rape is never a moral good.Right. Another way that you ignore what moral/morality is truly related to. You've redefined morality to mean something like a tool. That's not what morality is.
moralWhat relativism is
Cognitive relativism consists of two key claims:
1) The truth of any statement is relative to–i.e. can only be determined from–a particular standpoint (a.k.a. "perspective", "theoretical framework" or "conceptual scheme").
2) No standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others. In other words, metaphysically speaking, all standpoints are on the same level; none can be conclusively proved superior to any other. For any attempted proof will rest on premises that belong to that standpoint. The argumentation will therefore be circular.
![]()