Moral relativism

Mmhmm.
What about killing babies in the womb?
He has no morals, He is amoral, so he cannot answer your question.

You and I each have our own set of morals.
I believe you and I each consider such a murder for convenience to be against our morals.

For many Democrats, such a murder is completely in accordance with their own morals.
For other Democrats, they are amoral, like Hugo. They cannot answer your question.
 
It kinda defines morality.
Abortion does not define morality. The word 'morality' stems from Latin, meaning 'custom', or 'way of life'. The Japanese use the word 'do' for this purpose, as in dojo, karate-do, kendo, or shendo.

Each person establishes their own morals. There is no 'absolute morals'; just as each person establishes their own reality. There is no absolute reality.
 
Abortion does not define morality. The word 'morality' stems from Latin, meaning 'custom', or 'way of life'. The Japanese use the word 'do' for this purpose, as in dojo, karate-do, kendo, or shendo.

Each person establishes their own morals. There is no 'absolute morals'; just as each person establishes their own reality. There is no absolute reality.
I disagree. God's way is absolute morality.
My sinner self ain't gonna live up to it, but there is a standard.
 
Yes, people like you obsess on it because it is theology. Not interested.
Morals is not theology, Hugo, but a religious person may establish their own morals in accordance with a god or gods, or the complete lack of them.

People often establish morals based on their religion. This is true for Christianity, Buddhism, Shintoism, or even the Church of Global Warming or the Church of Hate.

I have observed that fundamentalists often claim their morals are 'absolute'.
 
I disagree. God's way is absolute morality.
My sinner self ain't gonna live up to it, but there is a standard.
There are no absolute morals.

Your morals are your own. They can only be established by you, even if you base them on the teachings of Christ and God. It is what makes you a Christian.

I submit, that despite all the teachings of Christ and God, you do not know "God's way". He is still a mystery, even to Christians. Sure, the more you know of Him, the better, but you cannot put yourself into the mind of God. His morals are His morals, just as your morals are your morals.

Remember this, as all Christians will be tested on their faith. Old and New Testament, God is the same.

I do not denounce your beliefs in Christianity. I welcome them. I am a Christian myself, and I know some of the peace you have found from it.
 
Last edited:
The English language is not an opinion written in English, moron.

The English language is not an opinion.
Anyway, leaving Retardville....

It is your opinion that all morality is subjective. Yet you refuse to discuss or debate your opinion, you just keep circling back and restating what you believe.

Whenever you want to discuss/ debate, we can do that. Until then, go play your stupid word games with somebody else.
 
Anyway, leaving Retardville....
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Denial of English.
It is your opinion that all morality is subjective.
English is not an opinion.
Yet you refuse to discuss or debate your opinion, you just keep circling back and restating what you believe.
English is not an opinion.
Whenever you want to discuss/ debate, we can do that. Until then, go play your stupid word games with somebody else.
Inversion fallacy. The word games are YOURS. English is not an opinion.
 
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Denial of English.

English is not an opinion.

English is not an opinion.

Inversion fallacy. The word games are YOURS. English is not an opinion.
The offer stands.

lol-omg-lol.gif
 
So you aren't talking about anything again.
Not with you because you intentionally avoid discussion on the topic....as I've mentioned. Here, here and here.

Now is when you reply with something dumb like 'you were never talking about a topic', then I'll reply with a gif and the circle will continue.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top