Democrats rebuke federal raid of Ilhan Omar’s home: ‘rogue abuse of power’

Typical behavior right out of the playbook of fascist/communist gov't. Keep making false accusations through friendly media for a lengthy period of time. Then use state "law enforcement" to raid an individual's business or home to give the appearance that there's probable cause and substantial circumstantial evidence to do so. Now of course, there is no oversight as to the "findings" of the co-opted law enforcement agencies, so they can fabricate whatever they need to sell to the public. Given that our current law enforcement and legal departments have demonstrated corruptive allegiance to Cheeto Jeezus (Holman, Patel, Blanche, Ratcliffe, SCOTUS), they can keep this afloat until the mid-terms and possibly beyond.

But the American public, getting financially screwed by this administration on a daily basis, is starting to wake up as they get fed up.

And the band played on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
Typical behavior right out of the playbook of fascist/communist gov't. Keep making false accusations through friendly media for a lengthy period of time. Then use state "law enforcement" to raid an individual's business or home to give the appearance that there's probable cause and substantial circumstantial evidence to do so. Now of course, there is no oversight as to the "findings" of the co-opted law enforcement agencies, so they can fabricate whatever they need to sell to the public. Given that our current law enforcement and legal departments have demonstrated corruptive allegiance to Cheeto Jeezus (Holman, Patel, Blanche, Ratcliffe, SCOTUS), they can keep this afloat until the mid-terms and possibly beyond.

But the American public, getting financially screwed by this administration on a daily basis, is starting to wake up as they get fed up.

And the band played on.
Sounds like what happened to Trump, more than once, by Democrats.
 
Sounds like what happened to Trump, more than once, by Democrats.
Except the allegations against Trump did not prove false and over whelming when exposed to a court, judge and jury, proved true.

Quite different that all the Trump DoJ indictments where most get laughed out of court, if not at the Grand Stage prior.
 
Except the allegations against Trump did not prove false and over whelming when exposed to a court, judge and jury, proved true.

They only found footing when you had a judge that was biased against Trump.
Quite different that all the Trump DoJ indictments where most get laughed out of court, if not at the Grand Stage prior.
Which indictments would those be?
 
Sounds like what happened to Trump, more than once, by Democrats.
Trump escaped several crimes. He is a damn crrook with no respect for the law. His theft of a truckload of classified documents is not over. The supremes saved him from facing a case he could not win. His organizing fake electors is still alive. His election interference is still percolating.
 
They only found footing when you had a judge that was biased against Trump.
^LIE
Which indictments would those be?
  • Letitia James (New York Attorney General): Her initial bank fraud indictment in Virginia was dismissed by U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie because acting U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan's appointment was unlawful. When the DOJ attempted to seek a fresh indictment, federal grand juries refused to return charges twice (issuing "no bills" in December 2025). [1, 2, 3]
  • James Comey (Former FBI Director): An earlier indictment against him was thrown out by a judge, who subsequently ruled that key evidence from the initial case could not be used by the DOJ for a renewed prosecution. [1]
  • **Mark Kelly and Elissa Slotkin (Democratic U.S. Senators) / Six Members of Congress: The U.S. Attorney's office in D.C. (led by Jeanine Pirro) attempted to secure sedition and conspiracy indictments against six Democratic lawmakers over a social media video advising service members that they could refuse illegal orders. The grand jury declined to hand up an indictment, going 0-for-6 and ruling that the government failed to meet the bar for probable cause. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  • Sidney Reid (Protester): Grand jurors in Washington, D.C. refused to indict her three separate times over allegations she forcefully pushed an FBI agent's hand against a wall. Although prosecutors attempted to move forward on misdemeanors that did not require grand jury approval, a trial jury ultimately acquitted her. [1, 2, 3]
  • Sean Dunn (Activist/DOJ employee): D.C. grand jurors refused to approve felony charges against him after he threw a sandwich at a federal/immigration agent during a protest. [1, 2, 3]
  • Eric Adams (New York City Mayor): A federal corruption case brought against him was permanently dismissed in April 2025 by U.S. District Judge Dale Ho, who noted that the proceedings appeared to "smack of a bargain". [1]
 
I did. I asked if you chose your title 'well known member' or it was system generated?
That was just a silly deflection, off topic and not worth my time. Not really a question.

And they "myth" is how can any tRumpling cuck claim to be a man?
 
Back
Top