Electrohead
Verified User
I voted for the Jarod answer because the op is such a welcoming and awesome human.
You still haven't specified any list of criminal liability, nor will you ever, because you are not aware of any.It involves the only thing we have access to at the moment with a Presidential protected from criminal liability for his actions by SCOTUS decree;
You still haven't specified any list of such grifting and unconstitutional actions on Trump's part, nor will you ever, because you are not aware of any.an opposition controlled Congress that hopefully will vastly curtail Trump’s further grifting and unconstitutional actions.
I see that you never got the memo that the President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States. Nobody ever pulled you aside and let you know that the President is expected to defend the US against all threats. You might want to brush up on the matter.Like starting wars
Too funny! "Passing"? Way too funny! As a Brit, you never learned how the US works, thinking that it functions the same as your backward European nobility system.and passing tariffs.
Too funny! No one ever taught you the concept of "delegation"! You are a marvel to behold. Try as you may, you can't get anything right. You never learned the material. Whoever is paying you isn't getting his money's worth.BOTH of which are Congressional powers, not Presidential.
You still haven't specified any list of criminal liability, nor will you ever, because you are not aware of any.
You still haven't specified any list of such grifting and unconstitutional actions on Trump's part, nor will you ever, because you are not aware of any.
I see that you never got the memo that the President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States. Nobody ever pulled you aside and let you know that the President is expected to defend the US against all threats. You might want to brush up on the matter.
Too funny! "Passing"? Way too funny! As a Brit, you never learned how the US works, thinking that it functions the same as your backward European nobility system.
Too funny! No one ever taught you the concept of "delegation"! You are a marvel to behold. Try as you may, you can't get anything right. You never learned the material. Whoever is paying you isn't getting his money's worth.
I voted for the Jarod answer because the op is such a welcoming and awesome human.
You are so full,if shite. I’ve repeated over and over again. The President has breached the Constitution by violating the Emoluments Clause.
He has usu-red the power of the Congress in imposing tariffs and conducting war outside the authority of the War Powers Act.
Both worthy of investigation.
There are also potential violations of misuse of the DOJ similar to what Nixon stepped down to avoid impeachment on.
I’ve said this many times but you simply ignore it.
Repeating a lie doesn't change the fact that you are lying.
Nope. All you do is regurgitate the same tired crap that has been rebutted a hundred times. You have never specified any of your general, unsupported assertions.I’ve repeated over and over again.
Nope. We've been over this time and time again, and even the most basic explanations are of no avail because you are too stupid to learn.The President has breached the Constitution
False.by violating the Emoluments Clause.
... entirely within the law. You never learned the word "delegation" because you are too stupid to learn. You have not made a single correct statement on this matter.He has usu-red the power of the Congress in imposing tariffs
You are incorrect again. The War Powers Act requires Trump to report actions he takes to Congress within 48 hours. Trump reported everything to Congress and to the world, along with video footage.and conducting war outside the authority of the War Powers Act.
Nope. Obeying the law to the letter never warrants any investigation. You Brits should learn US law.Both worthy of investigation.
Nope.There are also potential violations of misuse of the DOJ similar to what Nixon stepped down to avoid impeachment on.
I will say that you still have not specified any criminal activity or nefarious behavior on the part of Trump. You have lied repeatedly, but that does not count toward supporting your assertions, which remain completely unsupported.I’ve said this many times but you simply ignore it. Just as you will this time and then tell me again later I’ve never said what isolations exist that he could be investigated and I’m-reached on.
Since when is the US Navy a "He"? Apparently you were never able to learn that yes, the US Navy can, and will, blow any ship on the high seas out of the water for which there is unequivocal evidence of it being a threat to the US, that is ordered to halt, but that tries to flee.He can’t make threats up and order people killed for transporting fentanyl
Did you just pretend to declare that Trump cannot do something that he has already done?He can’t say we bombed Iran’s nuclear capacity back into the Stone Age then start a war later to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons.
We obey the law. We find attractive women to be attractive. We find it easy to troll undereducated leftists. Yes, the list seems quite long.You and Trump have an awful lot in common in that regard.
I care not where you were born, only that you were raised where they believe that all countries operate on the European model.I was born in Brooklyn, NYC, NY of Irish heritage boyo. Mind your manners.
Thank you. I'll take that as a compliment. I'm not looking to make the UK great again, but America, and the republic (not the democracy) for which We the People stand.And again I thank you for your outstanding display of MAGA lack of DISCERNMENT. You are the poster child for MAGA.
Who the fuck is dutch?It's expected from you, Dutch.
Nope. All you do is regurgitate the same tired crap that has been rebutted a hundred times. You have never specified any of your general, unsupported assertions.
Nope. We've been over this time and time again, and even the most basic explanations are of no avail because you are too stupid to learn.
False.
... entirely within the law. You never learned the word "delegation" because you are too stupid to learn. You have not made a single correct statement on this matter.
You are incorrect again. The War Powers Act requires Trump to report actions he takes to Congress within 48 hours. Trump reported everything to Congress and to the world, along with video footage.
I asked you a direct question that you were too cowardly and too dishonest to answer: Did Congress prohibit any such future action from Trump?
You are still completely incorrect on this matter and you are fully aware of this.
Nope. Obeying the law to the letter never warrants any investigation. You Brits should learn US law.
Nope.
I will say that you still have not specified any criminal activity or nefarious behavior on the part of Trump. You have lied repeatedly, but that does not count toward supporting your assertions, which remain completely unsupported.
Since when is the US Navy a "He"? Apparently you were never able to learn that yes, the US Navy can, and will, blow any ship on the high seas out of the water for which there is unequivocal evidence of it being a threat to the US, that is ordered to halt, but that tries to flee.
The problem here is on your end.
Did you just pretend to declare that Trump cannot do something that he has already done?
We obey the law. We find attractive women to be attractive. We find it easy to troll undereducated leftists. Yes, the list seems quite long.
I care not where you were born, only that you were raised where they believe that all countries operate on the European model.
Thank you. I'll take that as a compliment. I'm not looking to make the UK great again, but America, and the republic (not the democracy) for which We the People stand.
And repeated calling fact based accusations lies dint make those fact based accusations lies.
You don't deal in facts. You post salacious lies to defame, slander, and libel the enemies of your shameful party.
You again repeated the "emoluments" lie - despite the FACT that you have repeatedly had shoved down your throat that FOUR federal courts found NO SUPPORT for such claims.
Yet you keep lying - driven by hatred and a complete lack of ethics.
Shameful.
You are the loser who keeps on forfeiting.You are the gift that keeps on giving.
That's a great bluff on your part.That is a bold faced lie.
In lawfare, dismissal = exoneration.The court dismissed on two grounds.
In lawfare, when the tyranny must abandon its effort, it is "resolved."NONE, ZERO, NADA of the courts resolved the case.
We the People absolutely did recognize that the lawfare had no legal or Constitutional basis. You'll notice that We the People aren't as stupid as you are, and that We elected Trump 3-consecutive times. You aren't going to fare well on this argument.NONE, ZERO, NADA declared the accusations had no basis, no support, for the claims.
You are dishonestly trying to redefine the term emolument from "any profit acquired directly from abusing the power of public office" to "any profit unrelated to public office that was simply acquired while in public office" ... and you are butt-hurt that no one is stupid enough to fall for it.The historical definition of an emolument is : as a profit, gain, salary, or advantage received from employment, an office, or business dealings.
It only matters when you blow your dishonest semantic smoke. If, on the other hand, we remain completely honest, you've got no point at all.Trump has clearly seen economic advantage of business dealings while holding office.
Someone probably should have pulled you aside and mentioned that Trump has always been an international businessman, completely unrelated to holding any public office.In this term he has made crypto deals with entities he was conducting government business with,
This is wickedly dishonest. Trump's son is absolutely allowed to conduct any business he wishes. You are being so disingenuous that you simply point to other people ... and blame Trump. Stupid.having his son’s concerns complete those deals.
The same? You haven't specified any problem yet. Yes, Trump has done business with Arabs as well.He did the same
Are you suggesting that multitasking be criminalized?with Arab potentates, conducting real estate deals through Trump Inc. while doing the business if the federal government with them.
dems are also in the Epstein files.It involves the only thing we have access to at the moment with a Presidential protected from criminal liability for his actions by SCOTUS decree; an opposition controlled Congress that hopefully will vastly curtail Trump’s further grifting and unconstitutional actions. Like starting wars and passing tariffs. BOTH of which are Congressional powers, not Presidential.
That is a bold faced lie.
The court dismissed on two grounds. Lack of their standing to resolve, placing it outside their jurisdiction, and moot as Trump had left office.
NONE, ZERO, NADA of the courts resolved the case. NONE, ZERO, NADA declared the accusations had no basis, no support, for the claims.
The historical definition of an emolument is : as a profit, gain, salary, or advantage received from employment, an office, or business dealings.
Trump has clearly seen economic advantage of business dealings while holding office. In this term he has made crypto deals with entities he was conducting government business with,
having his son’s concerns complete those deals. He did the same with Arab potentates, conducting real estate deals through Trump Inc. while doing the business if the federal government with them.
![]()
Trump’s foreign licensing business booms to $59.5 million as Gulf developers pay
Nearly two-thirds of Trump’s foreign licensing fees came from two Gulf developers, in the UAE and Qatar, including one pursuing a $20 billion U.S. expansion.www.cnbc.com
![]()
How Trump’s $500 Million UAE Crypto Deal Trades U.S. National Security for Family Profit
Days before Trump’s second inauguration, the United Arab Emirates’ “Spy Sheikh” secretly bought 49 percent of the Trump family’s crypto firm. Months later, the administration handed over America’s most sensitive AI chips technology to the United Arab Emirates despite national security concerns...www.americanprogress.org
That's a great bluff on your part.
In lawfare, dismissal = exoneration.
In lawfare, when the tyranny must abandon its effort, it is "resolved."
We the People absolutely did recognize that the lawfare had no legal or Constitutional basis. You'll notice that We the People aren't as stupid as you are, and that We elected Trump 3-consecutive times. You aren't going to fare well on this argument.
You are dishonestly trying to redefine the term emolument from "any profit acquired directly from abusing the power of public office" to "any profit unrelated to public office that was simply acquired while in public office" ... and you are butt-hurt that no one is stupid enough to fall for it.
You Marxists see the word "profit" and think "We've got him now!"
I bet you think that no one has noticed that complete dishonesty is the common theme undergirding your posts. I'd be surprised if there were any elements of your posts that were true.
It only matters when you blow your dishonest semantic smoke. If, on the other hand, we remain completely honest, you've got no point at all.
Someone probably should have pulled you aside and mentioned that Trump has always been an international businessman, completely unrelated to holding any public office.
This is wickedly dishonest. Trump's son is absolutely allowed to conduct any business he wishes. You are being so disingenuous that you simply point to other people ... and blame Trump. Stupid.
The same? You haven't specified any problem yet. Yes, Trump has done business with Arabs as well.
Are you suggesting that multitasking be criminalized?
Well, Marxists of whatever color think that that making the world a better place, adding value to society and increasing human happiness should all be punished, preferably via assassination.The Communists think business should be outlawed.
He seeks to have happiness outlawed.It appears that he seeks to have all PRIVATE enterprise outlawed.
The term "bald faced lie" refers to the practice of Barristers to be clean shaven. The phrase came about because lawyers tend to lie brazenly and being "bald faced," that is without facial hair,was tied to lawyers.
That said. I agree that your claim that Trump violated the emoluments clause is indeed a bald faced lie - particularly in light of the number of times you've been corrected. You have contempt for the truth and clearly care only to smear the enemy of your party.
Four times you Communists attempted to sue Trump - four times you were shot down by the courts. Because your party was engaged in Lawfare to corrupt our elections, and had no legal basis for the attacks, as you full well know.
They threw the cases out as meritless. And rightly so. You continuing to lie, years later merely demonstrates your lack of ethics and integrity.
That's nice. The Emoluments CLAUSE in the Constitution that you are fighting to put an end to regards emoluments FROM foreign powers - as I have explained to you a half dozen time, yet you persist in lying.
The Foreign Emoluments Clause in the United States Constitution - a document you have clearly never read - Article I - section 9
{No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.}
The absurd idea that business dealings are or even should be prohibited is a level of stupidity only you Communists could come up with.
That's a lie - as most of what you post is. Eric Trump runs the Crypto business, and there is no "government business" involved.
You lie to slander the enemy of your party.
Further, those who invested in Trump$ have realized a 900% ROI.
Did he? It would be foolish to take your word for anything - you just lied about the crypto, after all.
CNBC found no evidence that the payments influenced administration decisions or resulted in special treatment.
You are smearing and defaming the enemy of your party - your own source says there is nothing there.
Lawfare attempt #5 - you think you Communists will succeed this time? Maybe get a corrupt Obama Judge?
A Communist hate site? Really? Look, I know these type of sleazy sources are what drive you..
And if your are claiming the WLF somehow was "buying influence," I will remind you they saw a 900% return on their investment.
You are a demagogue - a Goebbels level slanderer. You fling shit at the enemy of your party and hope you can get away with it.
So lets recap, you maliciously and blatantly lied that Trump violated the emoluments clause. You have been corrected for this lie repeatedly - yet persist in lying. Your lack of basic integrity overshadows any legitimate points you might otherwise have.
Stop lying if you want to be taken seriously.

dems are also in the Epstein files.
focus on policy. of course they're all trash.
wrong.You presume I’m unaware. It should ALL come out.
Good policy is the result of highly ethical, good, people who will do the right thing when called upon by the circumstances to go so.
That us why character and personal ethics is ALWAYS more important than platform in choosing leaders.
We, as a nation, in our national electoral aggregate, have forgotten that.
Trump wouldn’t be POTUS if we still remembered what was more important of those choices; character and ethical integrity or platform.