Predictions for the 2026 Midterms

The Midterms will see

  • democrats win both the house and the Senate

    Votes: 5 29.4%
  • Republicans will keep the Senate, but democrats will take the house

    Votes: 8 47.1%
  • Republicans will retain both house and Senate

    Votes: 2 11.8%
  • Donna TWUMP will declare hissef DICTATOR and cancel the election (The Jarod Answer.)

    Votes: 2 11.8%

  • Total voters
    17
Irrelevance fallacy.

I think I'd just call it "idiocy."

@ModernDiogenes hates Palin because the party told him to. The party hates Palin BECAUSE she is conservative.

McCain they could deal with, he was reliably left of center. A "maverick" who aligned with the democrats in the Senate. But Palin is a Ronald Reagan Republican, hence he hates here, as the party commands.
 
@Into the Night

@Uncensored2008

It confounds me that from where you two stand, with how fundamentally flawed the ethics are of not only supporting someone whose done as much bad as Trump but that you’d have the unmitigated gaul to comment on another.

You're not in a position to judge. With as flawed, as absent as your ethical foundation is, the hypocrisy involved in attacking the enemy of your party is off the scale.

To question anyone else’s ethics.

I don't question your ethics,;I point out the fact that you have none. You lie incessantly to either promote your party or to slander the enemies of the party.

It shouldn’t, I suppose, surprise me given how low you’ve already unthinkingly gone in your placing such a person as Trump in such a place of high power.

We wanted the border secured and taxes lowered. We are conservatives. Trump delivered - in MONTHS, not years. You hate him (even more) for it.

You are a socialist - you want the USA destroyed as a sovereign nation, a territory without borders ruled by an international Oligarchy.

Nothing you can say to me, about me, is going to do me harm because I know it’s source and that source is fundamentally flawed. The plant is sick at its root.

Do you harm? Where do you come up with such melodrama? The harm will be done by your party and the destruction of this Republic that you seek.

That is what I’ve tried to give you opportunity to show others present. So they can see just how ethically sick hardcore MAGA type thinking is. You have not disappointed.

What you've done is recite long debunked leftist talking points - hating points really,

When shown they are false - you lie profusely - you lack integrity.

You won’t believe me that I bare you no animosity.

You bear great animosity toward the Constitutional Republic. You seek to end it.

What I feel is pity. I wouldn’t change places with either of you. I do wish you well. I honestly do. I can’t think of anyone more in need of the good wishes of others. I hope you have that “Come to Jesus” moment.

Boring nonsense. You're a run of the mill communist who thought you could "fool" others that you are somehow a "conservative."
 
Flat tax. Anti-monopoly enforcement of the Sherman Anti-trust Act. Welfare is a hand up, not a hand out. Control of the border and registration of migratory labor crossing it. Anti-corruption Bureau Creation Act (S,5183) and other anti-corruption legislation. A balanced budget Amendment. Term limits.
You omitted your thoughts on Global Warming, Climate Change, carbon tax, ocean acidification, sea level rise, greenhouse effect, carbon neutralization, eliminating hydrocarbons, alternative energy mandates, etc.
 
I carry. I’d give any person the right to carry if they did what I did to carry mine.

1) Full background check.

2) Full psyche evaluation.

3) Retention, live fire and scored under duress, use of force law training.

You do that I can’t see why you shouldn’t be able to do what I do and I’m free to carry in all 50 states and U.S. dominions.

I was a NRA certified firearms instructor for over 20 years. Does that count?
 
McCain was a RINO, i.e. a Democrat VIP. This is why the Democrats allowed him to run against Obama; McCain promised to make a half-hearted effort. The following election, Romney earned the top RINO seat and was allowed to make a lame run, just for show, against Obama.

And the fact that Palin was NOT a RINO is why the leftists hate her. McCain was always the favorite RINO for the democrats.
 
I carry. I’d give any person the right to carry if they did what I did to carry mine.

1) Full background check.

2) Full psyche evaluation.

3) Retention, live fire and scored under duress, use of force law training.

You do that I can’t see why you shouldn’t be able to do what I do and I’m free to carry in all 50 states and U.S. dominions.
Would you give any citizen the right to vote if they pass;

1) Full background check.
2) Full psyche evaluation.
3) Retention, a constitutional class taught by Hillsdale College every 2 years.


Why or why not? If not, explain why some constitutional "rights" have to be "earned" and some don't.
 
You omitted your thoughts on Global Warming, Climate Change, carbon tax, ocean acidification, sea level rise, greenhouse effect, carbon neutralization, eliminating hydrocarbons, alternative energy mandates, etc.

Also TransGender (supremacy) "rights." Illegal Aliens voting, "Billionaire tax", etc.
 
Would you give any citizen the right to vote if they pass;

1) Full background check.
2) Full psyche evaluation.
3) Retention, a constitutional class taught by Hillsdale College every 2 years.
I am vehemently opposed to this idea that the 2nd Amendment is somehow a privilege that must be licensed by passing government tests.

If you give the government an avenue to withhold the license for your Constitutional rights, the government will devise a way to withhold all licenses just as the Jill Biden administration withheld all oil drilling licenses. If you give the government the power to determine whether or not you "pass" a "background check" in order to enjoy your Constitutional rights, then the government will devise a "no fly" terrorist list, from which no names may ever be removed, and start loading everyone's name onto it, and we will all watch as one-by-one, everyone has their Constitutional rights rescinded.
 
I was a NRA certified firearms instructor for over 20 years. Does that count?

It likely takes care of 3. I have no idea what NRA does to train on weapons retention and use of force law though.

Add the background check and the psych eval and you're home.

I am vehemently opposed to this idea that the 2nd Amendment is somehow a privilege that must be licensed by passing government tests.

And having made my living on the streets of a very urban major city I am vehemently opposed to allowing people guns, people like me would have to deal with from a law enforcement perspective, that haven't be vetted for criminal records and mental health issues.
 
I think I'd just call it "idiocy."

I am not the one who made a unethical fraud who'd stolen hundreds of millions for tens of thousands President because some bad TV game show producer made him the star of a extremely dumb scripted reality TV show and cast him as a "business tycoon".

You seem to not understand how foolish that appears to anyone capable of DISCERNMENT.

You're not in a position to judge. With as flawed, as absent as your ethical foundation is, the hypocrisy involved in attacking the enemy of your party is off the scale.

I think I am more than happy leaving that to anyone following this exchange. Though I am not sure anyone is any longer. I am sure we've bored them to tears ages ago. Though I do have this thread to point people to if they ask, "What does the mind of MAGA look like.", and in that regard I thank you again.
 
It likely takes care of 3. I have no idea what NRA does to train on weapons retention and use of force law though.

Add the background check and the psych eval and you're home.



And having made my living on the streets of a very urban major city I am vehemently opposed to allowing people guns, people like me would have to deal with from a law enforcement perspective, that haven't be vetted for criminal records and mental health issues.

Likely? It's probable one of our instructors trained you. I shoot along side law enforcement at my gun club. Quite often, actually.

I needed fingerprinted in order to purchase one of my weapons from the Dept. of the Army. That should suffice.

Psych eval? Who the hell is qualified to perform that?

Again, look up who the NRA instructors train. It is very often law enforcement.
Not to mention the competitions the NRA holds for them.
I'd be willing to put my firearm skills up against yours...any day. Clean your spotting scope lenses!
 
You omitted your thoughts on Global Warming, Climate Change, carbon tax, ocean acidification, sea level rise, greenhouse effect, carbon neutralization, eliminating hydrocarbons, alternative energy mandates, etc.
Also TransGender (supremacy) "rights." Illegal Aliens voting, "Billionaire tax", etc.


Global warming is real. The metrics do not lie. Ocean temperatures are rising. The polar ice caps melting. The water levels rising. Weather systems have become more volatile. This is all numbers and numbers do not lie. What we do not know is how much of it is natural and how much of it is man made.

I do not know how we address it, since if it is more a natural phenomenon I am not sure there is much mankind can do to address it. Though we ought to try as much of lower Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn are going to be under water at some point, as well as a lot of Florida. The naval base at Norfork is largely flooded nine to ten times a year these days. The Army Corp of Engineers estimates that by 2050 it could be flooded 280 days of the year, and by 2100 over 20% if the base would be permanently under water.

I am all for green energy but it has nothing to do with the environment. It has everything to do with economics. The economy of scale says that carbon energy is going to continue rising in cost, while green energy will continue to fall in price. The nation that handles the conversion best and holds the patents for it will have a major advantage in the economics of the future. I'd like that to be the United States.

Trans people have human rights. That does not mean you allow children who have no knowledge of themselves yet or their sometimes ditzy parents to make choices in their adolescence that will have lifetime impact on their lives. What needs to be done is allow them to get to know themselves, give them all the love and the best advice they can get from professionals, and make those life altering decisions when they are mature enough to make them.

It also doesn't mean its fair to allow those who have begand maturation of their bodies under male hormones to compete in women's sports. Anymore than you would allow any other participants who had long term use of PEDs to compete.
 
Likely? It's probable one of our instructors trained you. I shoot along side law enforcement at my gun club. Quite often, actually.

My original instructors were former Marine D.I.'s. I had further instruction by the ATF and on my own dime from "Caliber Press" back when they were doing their "Street Survival" instruction for law enforcement.

I needed fingerprinted in order to purchase one of my weapons from the Dept. of the Army. That should suffice.

If the finger printing was part of a comprehensive criminal background check, as mine was, that is great.

Psych eval? Who the hell is qualified to perform that?

I would suppose the same type of personal as the one that conducted mine, who was an M.D. in psychology. [AKA, a psychiatrist].

Again, look up who the NRA instructors train. It is very often law enforcement.

I am aware. I am not casting dispersions on them as trainers. They just didn't train my acadamy class, nor where they trainers in my advanced classes later on, those where professional law enforcers themselves. Though I think I remember one of them saying they had taken NRA classes at one point.

Not to mention the competitions the NRA holds for them.

Competitions are all well and good but none of that kind of shooting has much to do with the use of firearms under duress in self defense or law enforcement applications.

I'd be willing to put my firearm skills up against yours...any day. Clean your spotting scope lenses!

I use point and shoot at close range and iron sights out to 25 yards. I qualify twice annually. I initially qualified distinguished expert level and held that for over 40 years. I am 70 now, I do not practice all that often anymore, and my older hands and rotten lower body mobility issues means I only fire expert level these days. Still I think I might hold my own against most. Especially if its a firing under duress training exercise.
 
@Into the Night

@Uncensored2008

It confounds me that from where you two stand, with how fundamentally flawed the ethics are of not only supporting someone whose done as much bad as Trump but that you’d have the unmitigated gaul to comment on another.
So you have the unmitigated to comment on another.
To question anyone else’s ethics. It shouldn’t, I suppose, surprise me given how low you’ve already unthinkingly gone in your placing such a person as Trump in such a place of high power.
One person is not everyone. Illiteracy: plural used for singular.
Nothing you can say to me, about me, is going to do me harm because I know it’s source and that source is fundamentally flawed.
You harm yourself.
The plant is sick at its root.
Cliche fallacy.
That is what I’ve tried to give you opportunity to show others present. So they can see just how ethically sick hardcore MAGA type thinking is. You have not disappointed.
MAGA is not a person.
You won’t believe me that I bare you no animosity. What I feel is pity. I wouldn’t change places with either of you. I do wish you well. I honestly do. I can’t think of anyone more in need of the good wishes of others. I hope you have that “Come to Jesus” moment.
Random phrases. No apparent coherency.
 
Global warming is real.
No gas or vapor has the capability to create energy out of nothing. You are ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
The metrics do not lie.
No metrics. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. Argument from randU fallacy.
Ocean temperatures are rising.
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the ocean. Argument from randU fallacy.
The polar ice caps melting.
No, they aren't.
The water levels rising.
No, they aren't. Little airstrips built out in the Pacific during WW2 on nothing more than an atoll barely above the sea level are still there.
Weather systems have become more volatile.
Weather doesn't burn.
This is all numbers and numbers do not lie.
Random numbers are not data. Argument from randU fallacy.
What we do not know is how much of it is natural and how much of it is man made.
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing.
I do not know how we address it,
You can choose to believe in this religion, or like me, you can point out the religious aspects of the Church of Global Warming and how it routinely denies science and mathematics.
since if it is more a natural phenomenon
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics again.
I am not sure there is much mankind can do to address it.
I just described it.
Though we ought to try as much of lower Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn are going to be under water at some point, as well as a lot of Florida.
Florida used to be underwater. It isn't anymore.
I suppose you already forgot the hurricane that hit New York city.
The naval base at Norfork is largely flooded nine to ten times a year these days.
It's a naval base. The harbor is SUPPOSED to be flooded.
The Army Corp of Engineers estimates that by 2050 it could be flooded 280 days of the year, and by 2100 over 20% if the base would be permanently under water.
It's a naval base. The harbor is SUPPOSED to be flooded.
I am all for green energy
You mean:
Solar power, the most expensive method of generating electricity?
Wind power, the 2nd most expensive method of generating electricity?

Both are piddle power.
Someday you should visit a real power plant and see how it can be done economically.


but it has nothing to do with the environment.
The Church of Green denying the environment????!?
It has everything to do with economics.
Bad economics.
The economy of scale
Scale is not an economy.
says that carbon energy
Carbon is not energy.
is going to continue rising in cost,
Carbon is not energy.
while green energy
Green is not energy.
will continue to fall in price.
Green is not energy.
The nation that handles the conversion best and holds the patents for it will have a major advantage in the economics of the future. I'd like that to be the United States.
The United States has the best power generating capacity in the world AND the best interconnects in the world. No thanks, to the Church of Green.
Trans people have human rights.
Random phrase.
That does not mean you allow children who have no knowledge of themselves yet or their sometimes ditzy parents to make choices in their adolescence that will have lifetime impact on their lives. What needs to be done is allow them to get to know themselves, give them all the love and the best advice they can get from professionals, and make those life altering decisions when they are mature enough to make them.
So you are into mutilating children.
It also doesn't mean its fair to allow those who have begand maturation of their bodies under male hormones to compete in women's sports. Anymore than you would allow any other participants who had long term use of PEDs to compete.
And what has mutiliating children got to do with Global Warming?
 
My original instructors were former Marine D.I.'s. I had further instruction by the ATF and on my own dime from "Caliber Press" back when they were doing their "Street Survival" instruction for law enforcement.
Stop pretending.
If the finger printing was part of a comprehensive criminal background check, as mine was, that is great.
Stop pretending.
I would suppose the same type of personal as the one that conducted mine, who was an M.D. in psychology. [AKA, a psychiatrist].
Stop pretending.
I am aware. I am not casting dispersions on them as trainers. They just didn't train my acadamy class, nor where they trainers in my advanced classes later on, those where professional law enforcers themselves. Though I think I remember one of them saying they had taken NRA classes at one point.

Competitions are all well and good but none of that kind of shooting has much to do with the use of firearms under duress in self defense or law enforcement applications.

I use point and shoot at close range and iron sights out to 25 yards. I qualify twice annually. I initially qualified distinguished expert level and held that for over 40 years. I am 70 now, I do not practice all that often anymore, and my older hands and rotten lower body mobility issues means I only fire expert level these days. Still I think I might hold my own against most. Especially if its a firing under duress training exercise.
You hate guns. Stop pretending.
 
It likely takes care of 3. I have no idea what NRA does to train on weapons retention and use of force law though.

Add the background check and the psych eval and you're home.
Unconstitutional.
And having made my living on the streets of a very urban major city I am vehemently opposed to allowing people guns, people like me would have to deal with from a law enforcement perspective, that haven't be vetted for criminal records and mental health issues.
You don't get to choose who can have any weapon (including any gun). Hoplophobia. Discard of the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions.
 
I am vehemently opposed to this idea that the 2nd Amendment is somehow a privilege that must be licensed by passing government tests.

Yes, but let's see if our little Bolshevik friend would also make voting a licensed privilege.

If you give the government an avenue to withhold the license for your Constitutional rights, the government will devise a way to withhold all licenses just as the Jill Biden administration withheld all oil drilling licenses.

If something requires a license, it is NOT a right.

What our little Bolshevik friend is describing is a privilege handed out by our rulers contingent upon conformance to party objective.

Notice that he says civil rights should be contingent on passing a "Full psyche evaluation" He and his fellow Marxists have already stated that they view anyone opposed to the edicts of the party to be mentally ill.

If you give the government the power to determine whether or not you "pass" a "background check" in order to enjoy your Constitutional rights, then the government will devise a "no fly" terrorist list, from which no names may ever be removed, and start loading everyone's name onto it, and we will all watch as one-by-one, everyone has their Constitutional rights rescinded.

Not everyone, just enemies of the party. @ModernDiogenes is just demanding that the opposition be disarmed. In the same way Hitler disarmed the Jews.
 
Back
Top