@Uncensored2008 If Palin was a conservative Barry Goldwater was a Liberal.
One of the dumber things you've posted.
Did you work on Jimmy Carter's campaign in 1980?
@Uncensored2008 If Palin was a conservative Barry Goldwater was a Liberal.
Irrelevance fallacy.
@Into the Night
@Uncensored2008
It confounds me that from where you two stand, with how fundamentally flawed the ethics are of not only supporting someone whose done as much bad as Trump but that you’d have the unmitigated gaul to comment on another.
To question anyone else’s ethics.
It shouldn’t, I suppose, surprise me given how low you’ve already unthinkingly gone in your placing such a person as Trump in such a place of high power.
Nothing you can say to me, about me, is going to do me harm because I know it’s source and that source is fundamentally flawed. The plant is sick at its root.
That is what I’ve tried to give you opportunity to show others present. So they can see just how ethically sick hardcore MAGA type thinking is. You have not disappointed.
You won’t believe me that I bare you no animosity.
What I feel is pity. I wouldn’t change places with either of you. I do wish you well. I honestly do. I can’t think of anyone more in need of the good wishes of others. I hope you have that “Come to Jesus” moment.
You omitted your thoughts on Global Warming, Climate Change, carbon tax, ocean acidification, sea level rise, greenhouse effect, carbon neutralization, eliminating hydrocarbons, alternative energy mandates, etc.Flat tax. Anti-monopoly enforcement of the Sherman Anti-trust Act. Welfare is a hand up, not a hand out. Control of the border and registration of migratory labor crossing it. Anti-corruption Bureau Creation Act (S,5183) and other anti-corruption legislation. A balanced budget Amendment. Term limits.
McCain was a RINO, i.e. a Democrat VIP. This is why the Democrats allowed him to run against Obama; McCain promised to make a half-hearted effort. The following election, Romney earned the top RINO seat and was allowed to make a lame run, just for show, against Obama.McCain they could deal with,
I carry. I’d give any person the right to carry if they did what I did to carry mine.
1) Full background check.
2) Full psyche evaluation.
3) Retention, live fire and scored under duress, use of force law training.
You do that I can’t see why you shouldn’t be able to do what I do and I’m free to carry in all 50 states and U.S. dominions.
McCain was a RINO, i.e. a Democrat VIP. This is why the Democrats allowed him to run against Obama; McCain promised to make a half-hearted effort. The following election, Romney earned the top RINO seat and was allowed to make a lame run, just for show, against Obama.
Would you give any citizen the right to vote if they pass;I carry. I’d give any person the right to carry if they did what I did to carry mine.
1) Full background check.
2) Full psyche evaluation.
3) Retention, live fire and scored under duress, use of force law training.
You do that I can’t see why you shouldn’t be able to do what I do and I’m free to carry in all 50 states and U.S. dominions.
You omitted your thoughts on Global Warming, Climate Change, carbon tax, ocean acidification, sea level rise, greenhouse effect, carbon neutralization, eliminating hydrocarbons, alternative energy mandates, etc.
I am vehemently opposed to this idea that the 2nd Amendment is somehow a privilege that must be licensed by passing government tests.Would you give any citizen the right to vote if they pass;
1) Full background check.
2) Full psyche evaluation.
3) Retention, a constitutional class taught by Hillsdale College every 2 years.
I was a NRA certified firearms instructor for over 20 years. Does that count?
I am vehemently opposed to this idea that the 2nd Amendment is somehow a privilege that must be licensed by passing government tests.
I think I'd just call it "idiocy."
You're not in a position to judge. With as flawed, as absent as your ethical foundation is, the hypocrisy involved in attacking the enemy of your party is off the scale.
It likely takes care of 3. I have no idea what NRA does to train on weapons retention and use of force law though.
Add the background check and the psych eval and you're home.
And having made my living on the streets of a very urban major city I am vehemently opposed to allowing people guns, people like me would have to deal with from a law enforcement perspective, that haven't be vetted for criminal records and mental health issues.
You omitted your thoughts on Global Warming, Climate Change, carbon tax, ocean acidification, sea level rise, greenhouse effect, carbon neutralization, eliminating hydrocarbons, alternative energy mandates, etc.
Also TransGender (supremacy) "rights." Illegal Aliens voting, "Billionaire tax", etc.
Likely? It's probable one of our instructors trained you. I shoot along side law enforcement at my gun club. Quite often, actually.
I needed fingerprinted in order to purchase one of my weapons from the Dept. of the Army. That should suffice.
Psych eval? Who the hell is qualified to perform that?
Again, look up who the NRA instructors train. It is very often law enforcement.
Not to mention the competitions the NRA holds for them.
I'd be willing to put my firearm skills up against yours...any day. Clean your spotting scope lenses!
So you have the unmitigated to comment on another.@Into the Night
@Uncensored2008
It confounds me that from where you two stand, with how fundamentally flawed the ethics are of not only supporting someone whose done as much bad as Trump but that you’d have the unmitigated gaul to comment on another.
One person is not everyone. Illiteracy: plural used for singular.To question anyone else’s ethics. It shouldn’t, I suppose, surprise me given how low you’ve already unthinkingly gone in your placing such a person as Trump in such a place of high power.
You harm yourself.Nothing you can say to me, about me, is going to do me harm because I know it’s source and that source is fundamentally flawed.
Cliche fallacy.The plant is sick at its root.
MAGA is not a person.That is what I’ve tried to give you opportunity to show others present. So they can see just how ethically sick hardcore MAGA type thinking is. You have not disappointed.
Random phrases. No apparent coherency.You won’t believe me that I bare you no animosity. What I feel is pity. I wouldn’t change places with either of you. I do wish you well. I honestly do. I can’t think of anyone more in need of the good wishes of others. I hope you have that “Come to Jesus” moment.
No gas or vapor has the capability to create energy out of nothing. You are ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.Global warming is real.
No metrics. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. Argument from randU fallacy.The metrics do not lie.
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the ocean. Argument from randU fallacy.Ocean temperatures are rising.
No, they aren't.The polar ice caps melting.
No, they aren't. Little airstrips built out in the Pacific during WW2 on nothing more than an atoll barely above the sea level are still there.The water levels rising.
Weather doesn't burn.Weather systems have become more volatile.
Random numbers are not data. Argument from randU fallacy.This is all numbers and numbers do not lie.
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing.What we do not know is how much of it is natural and how much of it is man made.
You can choose to believe in this religion, or like me, you can point out the religious aspects of the Church of Global Warming and how it routinely denies science and mathematics.I do not know how we address it,
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics again.since if it is more a natural phenomenon
I just described it.I am not sure there is much mankind can do to address it.
Florida used to be underwater. It isn't anymore.Though we ought to try as much of lower Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn are going to be under water at some point, as well as a lot of Florida.
It's a naval base. The harbor is SUPPOSED to be flooded.The naval base at Norfork is largely flooded nine to ten times a year these days.
It's a naval base. The harbor is SUPPOSED to be flooded.The Army Corp of Engineers estimates that by 2050 it could be flooded 280 days of the year, and by 2100 over 20% if the base would be permanently under water.
You mean:I am all for green energy
The Church of Green denying the environment????!?but it has nothing to do with the environment.
Bad economics.It has everything to do with economics.
Scale is not an economy.The economy of scale
Carbon is not energy.says that carbon energy
Carbon is not energy.is going to continue rising in cost,
Green is not energy.while green energy
Green is not energy.will continue to fall in price.
The United States has the best power generating capacity in the world AND the best interconnects in the world. No thanks, to the Church of Green.The nation that handles the conversion best and holds the patents for it will have a major advantage in the economics of the future. I'd like that to be the United States.
Random phrase.Trans people have human rights.
So you are into mutilating children.That does not mean you allow children who have no knowledge of themselves yet or their sometimes ditzy parents to make choices in their adolescence that will have lifetime impact on their lives. What needs to be done is allow them to get to know themselves, give them all the love and the best advice they can get from professionals, and make those life altering decisions when they are mature enough to make them.
And what has mutiliating children got to do with Global Warming?It also doesn't mean its fair to allow those who have begand maturation of their bodies under male hormones to compete in women's sports. Anymore than you would allow any other participants who had long term use of PEDs to compete.
Stop pretending.My original instructors were former Marine D.I.'s. I had further instruction by the ATF and on my own dime from "Caliber Press" back when they were doing their "Street Survival" instruction for law enforcement.
Stop pretending.If the finger printing was part of a comprehensive criminal background check, as mine was, that is great.
Stop pretending.I would suppose the same type of personal as the one that conducted mine, who was an M.D. in psychology. [AKA, a psychiatrist].
You hate guns. Stop pretending.I am aware. I am not casting dispersions on them as trainers. They just didn't train my acadamy class, nor where they trainers in my advanced classes later on, those where professional law enforcers themselves. Though I think I remember one of them saying they had taken NRA classes at one point.
Competitions are all well and good but none of that kind of shooting has much to do with the use of firearms under duress in self defense or law enforcement applications.
I use point and shoot at close range and iron sights out to 25 yards. I qualify twice annually. I initially qualified distinguished expert level and held that for over 40 years. I am 70 now, I do not practice all that often anymore, and my older hands and rotten lower body mobility issues means I only fire expert level these days. Still I think I might hold my own against most. Especially if its a firing under duress training exercise.
Unconstitutional.It likely takes care of 3. I have no idea what NRA does to train on weapons retention and use of force law though.
Add the background check and the psych eval and you're home.
You don't get to choose who can have any weapon (including any gun). Hoplophobia. Discard of the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions.And having made my living on the streets of a very urban major city I am vehemently opposed to allowing people guns, people like me would have to deal with from a law enforcement perspective, that haven't be vetted for criminal records and mental health issues.
I am vehemently opposed to this idea that the 2nd Amendment is somehow a privilege that must be licensed by passing government tests.
If you give the government an avenue to withhold the license for your Constitutional rights, the government will devise a way to withhold all licenses just as the Jill Biden administration withheld all oil drilling licenses.
If you give the government the power to determine whether or not you "pass" a "background check" in order to enjoy your Constitutional rights, then the government will devise a "no fly" terrorist list, from which no names may ever be removed, and start loading everyone's name onto it, and we will all watch as one-by-one, everyone has their Constitutional rights rescinded.