Democrat Cheating and Treachery So Bad In Alaska That.....

Moosakofsky said:
Voters. Conspiracy to deceive the voters.

No but it won’t be hard to prove he was recruited for the purpose of deception.
He’s done zero campaigning and he initially filed as Daniel S. Sullivan, the same middle initial as the senator. He had to change it only when the Elections Director caught it.
If I were him I’d lawyer up and cooperate.
Click to expand...
Alaska Supreme Court sees no crime.
 
Hume said:
You are too silly to take seriously. A polite way to say you are a liar.
Click to expand...
Was Donald J. Trump ever an FBI agent?

No. Donald J. Trump was never an FBI agent. There is no credible evidence that he was ever employed by the FBI or served as a sworn federal law enforcement officer.

ChatGPT.com
 
Moosakofsky said:
Was Donald J. Trump ever an FBI agent?

No. Donald J. Trump was never an FBI agent. There is no credible evidence that he was ever employed by the FBI or served as a sworn federal law enforcement officer.

ChatGPT.com
Click to expand...
I don't know what you are talking about, and I really do not care.
 
Moosakofsky said:
There was no criminal investigation going on when they allowed his name on the ballot.
Click to expand...
Exactly. And why not?

Answer: because election administration and determinations belong to the State. If the State Supreme Court adjudicates it and says it is OK that is the last word.

The idea the Feds can come in and say sorry SC but we think you got it wrong is just yet another pissing on the Constitution by magats.

The idea that magat Feds can say ' if our guy wins we will let it stand but if our guy loses we want it over turned ' shows what a joke their stance is.

Things get adjudicted before the election for just that reason so no party can create a 'heads we win, tails you lose ' scenario after the fact
 
QP! said:
Exactly. And why not?
Click to expand...
They weren’t aware of any conspiracy to defraud the voters.
QP! said:
Answer: because election administration and determinations belong to the State. If the State Supreme Court adjudicates it and says it is OK that is the last word.
Click to expand...
That’s not the answer a to the question why there was no criminal investigation at the time.
That’s the answer to a different question.
QP! said:
The idea the Feds can come in and say sorry SC but we think you got it wrong is just yet another pissing on the Constitution by magats.
Click to expand...
They’re not doing that. The election will stand as it is regardless of any criminal findings.
QP! said:
The idea that magat Feds can say ' if our guy wins we will let it stand but if our guy loses we want it over turned ' shows what a joke their stance is.

Things get adjudicted before the election for just that reason so no party can create a 'heads we win, tails you lose ' scenario after the fact
Click to expand...
You obviously don’t understand what the criminal investigation is about. It’s not about the actual election.
It’s about the attempt by the Peltola campaign workers to defraud the voters.
 
QP! said:
ElectionDetails of the TacticOutcome & Impact
2024 Washington Gubernatorial PrimaryA Republican activist paid two distinct individuals named Bob Ferguson to enter the Democratic primary. Their presence was designed to split the vote of the actual Democratic State Attorney General Bob Ferguson.The scheme failed quickly. The original Bob Ferguson threatened legal action, and the two decoy candidates withdrew within days. (The real Bob Ferguson was later elected governor).
2020 Florida State Senate District 37 RaceFormer Republican State Senator Frank Artiles paid an acquaintance named Alex Rodriguez to run as an independent "ghost candidate". The objective was to draw votes away from the incumbent Democrat, José Javier Rodríguez.The tactic succeeded. The independent Alex Rodriguez captured over 6,000 votes despite not running a campaign. The Democratic incumbent lost the election by a mere 32 votes to Republican Ileana Garcia. Artiles was later convicted of campaign finance felonies related to the scheme.
1990s and 2010s "Tea Party" / Third-Party SplitsBeyond exact name matching, Republican groups have repeatedly funded or actively gathered signatures for unaffiliated third-party candidates (such as progressive independent Cornel West in 2024 or Green Party candidates). The explicit goal is to create alternative names on the ballot that peel away specific progressive voting blocs.Results vary by state, but third-party presence heavily influences tight margins in swing districts by acting as intentional structural spoilers.
Click to expand...
No source link. WTF!?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top