Ilhan Omar’s Shady Castle Starts to Crumble

Your Communists have raped and murdered our system of justice.



New York is utterly lawless. Enemies of the party are imprisoned while party members are immune to laws. Pretty much like North Korea.
Your Communists have raped and murdered our system of justice.



New York is utterly lawless. Enemies of the party are imprisoned while party members are immune to laws. Pretty much like North Korea.
tsk - tsk - justice is coming for trump's victims, Sally!

1794098211692.png
 
  • Haha
Reactions: QP!
No, no they have not as Prof Turley clearly lays out above.

A SoS cannot simply just declare Matt Dillon or Earl, or Ilhan or any citizen "illegal" with no other process and then revoke their citizenship and deport them. You truly are basement level stupid, like Earl, to believe that true.

If true a Dem SoS could deport each and every Magat citizen not born in the US just be declaration. Not a single hearing or court case necessary. Just say the magic words 'I think you illegal so you are gone' and that would be it.

I sometimes think you guys are trolling and just playing at being at this dumb but then you always prove it to be true.
He can if they or their parents were naturalized under false pretenses. Dumbass.
That's a real thing. Does it make you feel sad?
I don't care. :dunno:
 
Trump was found liable by a jury of his peers. I guess justice only works for trumptards when it works against their enemies.

You and the Epstein class went down last Tuesday, Princess.

View attachment 100761
There is no justice, there's just us.
I know what justice is, boy, and the law is not always the way.
I'd say the law gets it right about 65% of the time, maybe, and that's how it is in America.
Every neighborhood should have a committee like my old one did to take out the trash.
I know what that monster did, and then the law set him free a few short years later, and he did it again, twice, to girls in the neighborhood.
And then he never did that again. Never seen again, either. No one called the police.
I wouldn't even talk about this online, but I'm pretty sure they're all dead and can't be prosecuted.
 
He can if they or their parents were naturalized under false pretenses. Dumbass.
That's a real thing. Does it make you feel sad?
I don't care. :dunno:
Like Earl you are so stupid you do not know what this word means "IF".

"...if they or their parents were naturalized under false pretenses,"


I understand you are incapable of understanding this but that "IF" is not something a SoS can just declare. It REQUIRES a finding in a court to go from "If they were naturalized under false pretense" to "we have determined they were naturalized under false pretense".

No SoS can simply say "i declare they were naturalized under false pretense and do not need to investigate that".

You and Earl are both deeply stupid so you will read the above and not comprehend it, and that is clear.
 
Like Earl you are so stupid you do not know what this word means "IF".

"...if they or their parents were naturalized under false pretenses,"


I understand you are incapable of understanding this but that "IF" is not something a SoS can just declare. It REQUIRES a finding in a court to go from "If they were naturalized under false pretense" to "we have determined they were naturalized under false pretense".

No SoS can simply say "i declare they were naturalized under false pretense and do not need to investigate that".

You and Earl are both deeply stupid so you will read the above and not comprehend it, and that is clear.
Omar's father was never naturalized. He was never a citizen. It is a fraud.
IOW, there are no records of that one's father ever becoming a citizen, therefore she is not.
 
Omar's father was never naturalized. He was never a citizen. It is a fraud.
IOW, there are no records of that one's father ever becoming a citizen, therefore she is not.
Again because you and Earl are deeply stupid you do not realize what you are saying is a CLAIM. It is NOT a finding. And for a citizen to be denaturalized and deported you need a FINDING in a court.

Just as even if we have a clear video of a person robbing a bank and they even admit it, that is NOT enough to put them in jail. No government official can just do that. They still have to go thru the court first where the FINDING is rendered and then they can be put in jail.

Same for denaturalization via any fraud. No govt official can just say 'i determine they did fraud' and a court must FIND it.,

but again, when speaking to you and Earl this is like trying to explain advanced calculus to two 4 year olds. You just do not have the intellect to understand what i am saying or what Prof Hurley, who Earl quoted above clearly says, so carry on with your stupidity. You really have no other option.
 
Omar's father was never naturalized. He was never a citizen. It is a fraud.
IOW, there are no records of that one's father ever becoming a citizen, therefore she is not.
One hundred percent, Matt.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) records indicate that a search for naturalization records belonging to Nur Omar Mohamed—the father of U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar—returned a Certificate of Nonexistence of Record. [1, 2, 3]

Key Details and Context
    • The Record Search: Following a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and inquiry by former congressional candidate AJ Kern, USCIS and DHS stated that a thorough database search using variations of Nur Omar Mohamed's name found no documentation or matching index reference showing that he ever naturalized as a U.S. citizen. [1, 2, 3]
    • Impact on Derivative Citizenship Claims: Representative Omar has historically faced political and public scrutiny regarding her arrival in the U.S. and her pathway to citizenship, including her claims surrounding derivative citizenship. Critics and investigators argue that the absence of naturalization records for her father challenges the validity of that timeline, while Representative Omar has denied wrongdoing and characterized investigations into her background as politically motivated. [1, 2, 3]
    • Federal Scrutiny: The ongoing public debate and federal interest in the matter have involved inquiries into historical immigration and birth documentation records.

This case is closed.

Ya esta.
 
One hundred percent, Matt.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) records indicate that a search for naturalization records belonging to Nur Omar Mohamed—the father of U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar—returned a Certificate of Nonexistence of Record. [1, 2, 3]

Key Details and Context
    • The Record Search: Following a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and inquiry by former congressional candidate AJ Kern, USCIS and DHS stated that a thorough database search using variations of Nur Omar Mohamed's name found no documentation or matching index reference showing that he ever naturalized as a U.S. citizen. [1, 2, 3]
    • Impact on Derivative Citizenship Claims: Representative Omar has historically faced political and public scrutiny regarding her arrival in the U.S. and her pathway to citizenship, including her claims surrounding derivative citizenship. Critics and investigators argue that the absence of naturalization records for her father challenges the validity of that timeline, while Representative Omar has denied wrongdoing and characterized investigations into her background as politically motivated. [1, 2, 3]
    • Federal Scrutiny: The ongoing public debate and federal interest in the matter have involved inquiries into historical immigration and birth documentation records.

This case is closed.

Ya esta.
OMG Earl and his stupidity are back and he is again using words he does not understand.

"...records indicate..." = claim.

A "claim" requires a "finding" in a court then to take that claim and make it actionable.

Even Prof Hurley, who Earl in his stupidity, thought supported his point, has spoken clearly on this saying Earl is wrong. oh and stupid.
 
Professor Jonathan Turley who Earl cites as his proof...


...emphasizes that a federal court must make the final determination before a naturalized citizen can lose their citizenship. Under U.S. constitutional law, a Cabinet member—such as the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Homeland Security—cannot unilaterally strip an individual of U.S. citizenship. [1, 2, 3]

When breaking down the legal process required for denaturalization, Turley and other legal experts emphasize the following strict procedural steps:
  • The Court's Final Word: Turley has explicitly noted that "the courts will have the final word". For denaturalization to occur, the Department of Justice (DOJ) must file a civil or criminal lawsuit in an Article III federal district court. [1, 2, 3]
  • High Burden of Proof: The government faces an exacting standard in court. It must present "clear, convincing, and unequivocal evidence" of fraud or material misrepresentation to a federal judge before a citizenship certificate can be legally revoked. [1, 2, 3]
  • Due Process and Removal: Only after a federal judge signs an order officially revoking a person's citizenship can the government place that individual into separate deportation or removal proceedings within the immigration court system. [1, 2]
Ultimately, executive branch officials handle the underlying law enforcement investigation and the filing of the lawsuit, but the authority to strip citizenship rests solely with a federal judge, not a Secretary of State. [1, 2, 3]
 
OMG Earl and his stupidity are back and he is again using words he does not understand.

"...records indicate..." = claim.

A "claim" requires a "finding" in a court then to take that claim and make it actionable.

Even Prof Hurley, who Earl in his stupidity, thought supported his point, has spoken clearly on this saying Earl is wrong. oh and stupid.
Dear BeJeebus you're an uber retardo.
Dad=illegal alien
Daughter=illegal alien.
It's not hard stuff, Retardo Montalban.
Oh! That's what she said! 😆
 
Back
Top